Comparison of high-dimensional neural networks using hypercomplex numbers in a robot manipulator control

1. Alom MZ, Taha TM, Yakopcic C, Westberg S, Sidike P, Nasrin MS, Hasan M, Essen BCV, Awwal AAS, Asari VK (2019) A state-of-the-art survey on deep learning theory and architectures. Electronics 8(3):292

   Article  Google Scholar 

2. Parcollet T, Morchid M, Linarès G (2020) A survey of quaternion neural networks. Artif Intell Rev 53(4):2957–2982. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-019-09752-1

   Article  Google Scholar 

3. Shen W, Zhang B, Huang S,Wei Z, Zhang Q (2020) 3D-rotation-equivariant quaternion neural networks. In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision. Glasgow, United Kingdom, August 23–28, 2020, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 12365, Springer, pp. 531–547

4. Alfsmann D, Göckler HG, Sangwine SJ, Ell TA (2007) Hypercomplex algebras in digital signal processing: benefits and drawbacks. In: Proceedings of 15th European Signal Processing Conference. Poznan, Poland, September 3–7, 2007, IEEE, pp. 1322–1326

5. Schulz D, Seitz J, Paulo J, Costa JPCL (2011) Widely linear SIMO filtering for hypercomplex numbers. In: Proceedings of 2011 IEEE Information Theory Workshop. Paraty, Brazil, October 16–20, 2011, IEEE, pp. 390–394

6. Tripathi BK (2015) High dimensional neurocomputing—growth, appraisal and applications—. Springer

   MATH  Google Scholar 

7. Hpffmann J, Schmitt S, Osindero S, Simonyan K, Elsen E (2020) AlgebraNets. arXiv:2006.07360v2. pp 1–15

8. Nitta T (ed) (2009) Complex-Valued neural networks—utilizing high-dimensional parameters—. IGI Publishing, Hershey (Information Science Reference - Imprint of)

   Google Scholar 

9. Hirose A (ed) (2013) Complex-valued neural networks—advances and applications—. IEEE Press and Wiley, New Jersey

   MATH  Google Scholar 

10. García-Retuerta D, Casado-Vara R, Rey AM, Prieta FD, Prieto J, Corchado JM (2020) Quaternion neural networks: state-of-the-art and research challenges. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Intelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning. Guimaraes, Portugal, November 4–6, 2020, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 12490, Springer, pp 456–467

11. Buchholz S, Sommer G (2008) On Clifford neurons and Clifford multi-layer perceptrons. Neural Netw 21(7):925–935

    Article  Google Scholar 

12. Takahashi K (2017) Remarks on adaptive-type hypercomplex-valued neural network-based feedforward feedback controller. In: Proceedings of 17th IEEE International Conference on Computer and Information Technology. Helsinki, Finland, August 21–23, 2017, IEEE Computer Society, pp. 151–156

13. Cui Y, Takahashi K, Hashimoto M (2014) Remarks on robot controller application of Clifford multi-layer neural networks. In: Proceedings of 3rd IEEE International Workshop on Advanced Motion Control. Yokohama, Japan, March 14–16, 2014, IEEE, pp 410–415

14. Takahashi K (2019) Remarks on quaternion neural networks with application to trajectory control of a robot manipulator. In: Proceedings of the 2019 Australian & New Zealand Control Conference. Auckland, New Zealand, November 27–29, 2019, IEEE, pp 116–121

15. Takahashi K (2019) Comparison of neural network-based adaptive controllers using hypercomplex numbers for controlling robot manipulator. In: Proceedings of 13th IFAC Workshop on Adaptive and Learning Control Systems. Winchester, United Kingdom, December 4–6, 2019, IFAC–PapersOnLine, 52(92), pp 67–72

16. Gaudet CJ, Maida AS (2018) Deep quaternion networks. In: Proceedings of 2018 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, July 8–13, 2018, IEEE, pp 1–8

17. Hamilton WR (1853) Lectures on Quaternions. Hodges and Smith, Dublin

    Google Scholar 

18. Pogoruy AA, Rodriguez-Dagnino RM (2010) Some algebraic and analytical properties of coquaternion algebra. Adv Appl Clifford Algebras 20:79–84

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

19. Demir S, Tanışlı M, Candemir N (2010) Hyperbolic quaternion formulation of electromagnetism. Adv Appl Clifford Algebras 20:547–563

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

20. Kabadayi H, Yayli Y (2011) Homothetic motions at \(E^{4}\) with bicomplex numbers. Adv Appl Clifford Algebras 21:541–546

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

21. Navarro-Moreno J, Fernandez-Alcala RM, Jimenez-Lopez JD, Ruiz-Molina JC (2020) Tessarine signal processing under the \({\mathbb{T}}\)-properness condition. J Franklin Inst 357:10100–10126

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

22. Aydın FT (2018) Dual-complex k-fibonacci numbers. Chaos Solitons Fractals 115:1–6

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

23. Hitzer E (2013) Algebraic foundations of split hypercomplex nonlinear adaptive filtering. Math Methods Appl Sci 36(9):1042–1055

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

24. Xu D, Jahanchahi C, Took CC, Mandic DP (2015) Enabling quaternion derivatives: the generalized HR calculus. R Soc Open Sci 2(8):150255

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

25. Takahashi K (2018) Remarks on control of robot manipulator using quaternion neural network. In: Proceedings of Asia–Pacific Signal and Information Processing Association Annual Summit and Conference. Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, November 12–15, 2018, IEEE, pp 560–565

Download references