[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content
Log in

Practical CTL* model checking: Should SPIN be extended?

  • Special section on SPIN
  • Published:
International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

We describe an efficient CTL* model checking algorithm based on alternating automata and games. A CTL* formula, expressing a correctness property, is first translated to a hesitant alternating automaton and then composed with a Kripke structure representing the model to be checked, after which this resulting automaton is then checked for nonemptiness. We introduce the nonemptiness game that checks the nonemptiness of a hesitant alternating automaton (HAA). In the same way that alternating automata generalise nondeterministic automata, we show that this game for checking the nonemptiness of HAA, generalises the nested depth-first algorithm used to check the nonemptiness of nondeterministic Büchi automata (used in Spin).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Visser, W., Barringer, H. Practical CTL* model checking: Should SPIN be extended?. STTT 2, 350–365 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s100090050042

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s100090050042

Navigation