[go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Decentralized control architecture for multi-authoring microgrids

  • Regular Paper
  • Published:
Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A prosumer is a consumer who uses tiny, renewable electricity generation units and, in addition to consumption, can also generate electricity. With the increase in the number of prosumers in a power grid, it is expected that the paradigm of network utilization, at least at the distribution level, would change from centralized to decentralized utilization. In this new paradigm, microgrids are essential in the operation of the whole grid. The decentralized control of a stable network of microgrids (i.e., minimal power outages and fluctuations) is a significant challenge. In this paper, we present an architecture for decentralized control that consists of intelligent agents that manage the distribution network provided by the microgrids at the highest level and houses and their devices at the lowest level. The agents, managed by different private companies, dynamically organize themselves in units called holons, follow their defined policies, and can most tolerate network disruptions. In this architecture, self-adaptive agents will play a key role in sustaining network performance by controlling energy consumption and exchange (i.e., in the event of a shortage in a part of the distribution network). In the end, by simulating the architecture, the capabilities are shown.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Notes

  1. https://github.com/seyyed/DCAM

References

  1. Choi C, Esposito C, Wang H, Liu Z, Choi J (2018) Intelligent power equipment management based on distributed context-aware inference in smart cities. IEEE Commun Mag 18:212–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Marzal S, Salas R, González-medina R, Garcerá G, Figueres E (2018) Current challenges and future trends in the field of communication architectures for microgrids. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 82:3610–3622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Frey S, Diaconescu A, Menga D, Demeure I (2015) A generic holonic control architecture for heterogeneous multiscale and multiobjective smart microgrids. ACM Trans Auton Adapt Syst 10(2):1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Khan MW, Wang J, Xiong L, Ma M (2018) Modelling and optimal management of distributed microgrid using multi- agent systems. Sustain Cities Soc 41(May):154–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bui V, Member S, Hussain A, Member S, Kim H (2016) A multiagent-based hierarchical energy management strategy for multi-microgrids considering adjustable power and demand response. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 3053:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  6. Boudoudouh S, Maârou M (2018) Multi agent system solution to microgrid implementation. Sustain Cities Soc 39:252–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ansari J, Gholami A, Kazemi A (2016) Multi-agent systems for reactive power control in smart grids. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 83:411–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pahwa A et al (2015) Goal-based holonic multiagent system for operation of power distribution systems. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 6(5):2510–2518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dehghanpour K, Nehrir H (2018) Real-time multiobjective microgrid power management using distributed optimization in an agent-based bargaining framework. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 9(6):6318–6327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Albaker A (2018) Optimal Operation of Integrated Microgrids. University of Denver

    Google Scholar 

  11. Akter MN, Mahmud MA, Haque ME, Oo AMT (2020) An optimal distributed energy management scheme for solving transactive energy sharing problems in residential microgrids. Appl Energy 270(April):115133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Khorasany M, Azuatalam D, Glasgow R, Liebman A, Razzaghi R (2020) Transactive energy market for energy management in microgrids: the Monash microgrid case study. Energies 13(8):1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Xu D et al (2020) Peer-to-peer multi-energy and communication resource trading for interconnected microgrids. IEEE Trans Ind Inf 3203:1–1

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kusakana K (2020) Optimal peer-to-peer energy management between grid-connected prosumers with battery storage and photovoltaic systems. J. Energy Storage 32:101717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mohamed MA, Jin T, Su W (2020) Multi-agent energy management of smart islands using primal-dual method of multipliers. Energy 208:118306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Morstyn T, Member S, Hredzak B, Member S (2016) Control strategies for microgrids with distributed energy storage systems : an overview. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 3053:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ni J, Ai Q (2016) Economic power transaction using coalitional game strategy in micro-grids. IET Gener Transm Distrib 10(1):10–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yin S, Wang J, Qiu F (2019) Decentralized electricity market with transactive energy - A path forward. Electr J 32(4):7–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sypatayev D, Kumar Nunna H S V S, Shintemirov A (2020) A novel peer-to-peer Negawatt trading transactive energy system for prosumers. in 2020 IEEE 14th International Conference on Compatibility, Power Electronics and Power Engineering (CPE-POWERENG) pp 181–186

  20. Na U, Lee EK (2020) Fog BEMS: an agent-based hierarchical fog layer architecture for improving scalability in a building energy management system. Sustainability 12(7):1–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mishra S, Bordin C, Tomasgard A, Palu I (2019) A multi-agent system approach for optimal microgrid expansion planning under uncertainty. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 109:696–709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gomes L, Vale Z, Corchado JM (2020) Microgrid management system based on a multi-agent approach: an office building pilot. Measurement 154:107427D

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Negeri E, Baken N, Popov M (2013) Holonic architecture of the smart grid. Smart Grid Renew Energy 4(2):202–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ansari J, Kazemi A, Gholami A (2015) Holonic structure: a state-of-the-art control architecture based on multi-agent systems for optimal reactive power dispatch in smart grids. IET Gener Transm Distrib 9(14):1922–1934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Dozein MG, Monsef H, Ansari J, Kazemi A (2016) An effective decentralized scheme to monitor and control the reactive power flow: a holonic-based strategy. Int Trans Electr Energy Syst 26(6):1184–1209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. CEN-CENELEC-ETSI Smart Grid Coordination Group (2012) Smart grid reference architecture. https://syc-se.iec.ch/deliveries/sgam-basics/

  27. Rajput PK, Sikka G (2021) Multi-agent architecture for fault recovery in self-healing systems. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput 12(2):2849–2866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Tom RJ, Sankaranarayanan S, Rodrigues JJPC (2020) Agent negotiation in an IoT-Fog based power distribution system for demand reduction. Sustain Energy Technol Assess 38:100653

    Google Scholar 

  29. Fanitabasi F, Pournaras E (2020) Appliance-Level Flexible Scheduling for Socio-Technical Smart Grid Optimization 8

  30. Sampaio FC, Leão RPS, Sampaio RF, Melo LS, Barroso GC (2020) A multi-agent-based integrated self-healing and adaptive protection system for power distribution systems with distributed generation. Electr Power Syst Res 188(July):106525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Gollagi SG, Math MM, Daptardar AA (2020) A survey on pervasive computing over context-aware system. CCF Trans Pervasive Comput Interact 2(2):79–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Di Marzo Serugendo G, Gleizes M-P, Karageorgos A (2005) Self-organization in multi-agent systems. Knowl Eng Rev 20(02):165–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Bindelli S, Di Nitto E, Mirandola R, Tedesco R (2008) Building autonomic components: the SelfLets approach. Automated software engineering - workshops, 2008. ASE Workshops 2008:17–24

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kephart J, Chess D (2003) The vision of autonomic computing. Computer 36(1):41–50

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. Data.gov.au (2010) Smart-grid smart-city customer trial data - Dataset. https://data.gov.au/dataset/ds-dga-4e21dea3-9b87-4610-94c7-15a8a77907ef/details

  36. Huang R, Xiao Y, Liu M, Shen X, Huang W, Peng Y, Shen J (2022) Multilevel dynamic master-slave control strategy for resilience enhancement of networked microgrids. Energies 15(10):3698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. El Zerk A, Ouassaid M, Zidani Y (2022) Decentralised strategy for energy management of collaborative microgrids using multi-agent system. IET Smart Grid 5(6):440–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Hamidi M, Raihani A, Youssfi M, Bouattane O (2022) A new modular nanogrid energy management system based on multi-agent architecture. Int J Power Electron Drive Syst 13(1):178–190

    Google Scholar 

  39. Jiménez VA, Lizondo DF, Araujo PB, Will AL (2022) A conceptual microgrid management framework based on adaptive and autonomous multi-agent systems. J Comput Sci Technol 22:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  40. Blechmann S, Sowa I, Schraven MH, Streblow R, Müller D, Monti A (2023) Open source platform application for smart building and smart grid controls. Autom Constr 145:104622

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Tarbiat Modares University, Jalal AleAhmad, Tehran, Tehran, 1411713116, Iran

    Seyed Hossein Alavi Soltani, Saeed Jalili & Mohammad Kazem Sheikh El Eslami

Authors
  1. Seyed Hossein Alavi Soltani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Saeed Jalili
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mohammad Kazem Sheikh El Eslami
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saeed Jalili.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Soltani, S.H.A., Jalili, S. & Eslami, M.K.S.E. Decentralized control architecture for multi-authoring microgrids. Computing 105, 2621–2646 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00607-023-01201-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00607-023-01201-w

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Search

Navigation