Numerical Modeling of Discrete Fractures in a Field-Scale FORGE EGS Reservoir

• Antics MA (1997) Computer simulation of the oradea geothermal reservoir. In: Proceedings of the 22nd workshop on geothermal reservoir engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, 27–29 January 1997, pp 491–495

• Arihara N, Yoshida H, Hanano M, Ikeuchi K (1995) A simulation study on hydrothermal system o the Kakkonda geothermal field. In: Proceedings world geothermal congress ‘95, Florence, 18–31 May 1995, pp 1715–1720

• Axelsson G, Bjornsson G (1993) Detailed three-dimensional modeling of the Botn hydrothermal system in N-Iceland. In: Proceedings of the 18th workshop on geothermal reservoir engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, 26–28 January 1993, pp 159–166

• Berkowitz B (1995) Analysis of fracture network connectivity using percolation theory. Math Geol 27(4):467–483

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Blake K, Davatzes N (2012) Borehole image log and statistical analysis of FOH-3D, Fallon naval air station, NV. In: Proceedings, 37th workshop on geothermal reservoir engineering, Stanford University, February 2012, Paper No. SGP-TR-194, Stanford University, CA: SGW

• Blanksma DJ, Blake K, Pettitt W, Sabin A, Varun V, Damjanac B (2018) Using borehole induced structure measurements at Fallon FORGE combined with numerical modeling to estimate in situ stresses. In: Proceedings, 43rd workshop on geothermal reservoir engineering, Stanford University, February 2018. Stanford University, CA: SGW

• Boardman TS, Ali Khan M, Antunez E (1996) TOUGH2/PC application simulation project for Heber geothermal field, California, a progress report. In: Proceedings of the 21st workshop on geothermal reservoir engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, 22–24 January 1996, pp 135–141

• Bonnet E, Bour O, Odling NE, Davy P, Main I, Cowie P, Berkowitz B (2001) Scaling of fracture systems in geological media. Rev Geophys 39(3):374–383

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bour O, Davy P (1997) Connectivity of random fault networks following a power law fault length distribution. Water Resour Res 33(7):1567–1583

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Butler SJ, Sanyal SK, Henneberger RC, Klein CW, Gutierrez PH, de Leon JS (2000) Numerical modeling of the Cerro Prieto geothermal field, Mexico. In: Proceedings world geothermal, congress, Kyushu–Tohuku, Japan, 28 May–10 June 2000, pp 2545–2550

• Coats KH (1977) Geothermal reservoir modelling. Presented at the SPE annual fall technical conference and exhibition, Denver, Colorado, 9–12 October 1977, SPE-6892-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/6892-MS

• Cundall PA (1971) A computer model for simulating progressive, large-scale movements in blocky rock systems. In: Proceedings of the international symposium on rock mechanics, Nancy, France, pp 129–136

• Cundall PA, Strack ODL (1979) A discrete element model for granular assemblies. Geotechnique 29(1):47–65

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Davy P, Le Goc R, Darcel C, Bour O, de Dreuzy JR, Munier R (2010) A likely universal model of fracture scaling and its consequence for crustal hydromechanics. J Geophys Res 115:B10411

  Article  Google Scholar 

• de Dreuzy JR, Darcel C, Davy P, Bour O (2004) Influence of spatial correlation of fracture centers on the permeability of two-dimensional fracture networks following a power law length distribution. Water Resour Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003wr002260

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Donaldson IG, Sorey ML (1979) The best uses of numerical simulators. In: Proc., fifth workshop on geothermal reservoir engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, 241

• Hayashi K, Willis-Richards J, Hopkirk RJ, Niibori Y (1999) Numerical models of HDR geothermal reservoirs—a review of current thinking and progress. Geothermics 28(4/5):507–518

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ilyasov M, Ostermann I, Punzi A (2010) Handbook of geomathematics, modeling deep geothermal reservoirs: recent advances and future problems. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 679–711

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Itasca Consulting Group, Inc. (2016) 3DEC—three-dimensional distinct element code (Version 5.2). Itasca, Minneapolis

  Google Scholar 

• Kohl T, Evans KF, Hopkirk RJ, Rybach L (1995a) Coupled hydraulic and mechanical considerations for the simulation of hot dry rock reservoirs. Geothermics 24(3):333–343

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kohl T, Evans KF, Hopkirk RJ, Rybach L (1995b) Coupled hydraulic, thermal, and mechanical considerations for the simulation of hot dry rock reservoirs. Geothermics 24(3):345–359

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kolditz O (1994) Numerical simulation of flow and heat transfer at the Soultz and the Rosemanowes HDR sites. Trans Geotherm Resour Counc 18:457–464

  Google Scholar 

• Kolditz O (1995) Modeling of flow and heat transfer in fractured rock: conceptual model of a 3D deterministic fracture network. Geothermics 24(3):451–470

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kolditz O, Clauser C (1998) Numerical simulation of flow and heat transfer in fractured crystalline rocks: application to the hot dry rock site at Rosemanowes (UK). Geothermics 27(1):1–23

  Article  Google Scholar 

• McClure MW, Horne RN (2010) Discrete fracture modeling of hydraulic stimulation in enhanced geothermal systems. In: Proceedings, thirty-fifth workshop on geothermal reservoir engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, 1–3 February

• McClure MW, Horne RN (2013) Discrete fracture network modeling of hydraulic stimulation: coupling flow and geomechanics. Springer, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00383-2

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Menzies AJ, Pham M (1995) A field-wide numerical simulation model of The Geysers geothermal field, California, USA. In: Proceedings world geothermal congress ‘95, Florence, 18–31 May 1995, pp 1697–1702

• Mercer JW Jr, Pinder GF (1973) Galerkin finite-element simulation of a geothermal reservoir. Geothermics 2(3–4):81

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Nakanishi S, Iwai N (2000) Reservoir simulation study of the Onikobe geothermal field, Japan. In: Proceedings world geothermal congress, Kyushu–Tohuku, Japan, 28 May–10 June 2000, pp 2159–2164

• Nakanishi S, Abe M, Todaka N, Yamada M, Sierra JL, Gingins MO, Mas LC, Pedro GE (1995a) Copahue geothermal system, Argentina—study of a vapor dominated reservoir. In: Proceedings, world geothermal congress ‘95, Florence, 18–31 May 1995, pp 1167–1172

• Nakanishi S, Kawano Y, Todaka N, Akasaka C, Yoshida M, Iwai N (1995b) A reservoir simulation, of the Oguni geothermal field, Japan, using MINC type fracture model. In: Proceedings world geothermal congress ‘95, Florence, 18–31 May 1995, pp 1721–1726

• O’Sullivan MJ, Pruess K, Lippmann MJ (2001) State of the art of geothermal reservoir simulation. Geothermics 30(4):395

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Parini M, Acuna JA, Laudiano M (1996) Reinjected water return at Miravalles geothermal reservoir, Costa Rica: numerical modeling and observations. In: Proceedings of the 21st workshop on geothermal reservoir engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, 22–24 January 1996, pp 127–134

• Peirce AP, Bunger AP (2014) Interference fracturing: non-uniform distributions of perforation clusters that promote simultaneous growth of multiple hydraulic fractures. SPE J 20(2):384–395

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Pettitt WS, Pierce M, Damjanac B, Lorig L, Fairhurst C (2010) Fracture network engineering and enhanced geothermal systems. Geotherm Resour Trans 34:419–426

  Google Scholar 

• Pettitt WS, Riahi A, Hazzard J, Damjanac B, Blanksma D, Varun, Furtney J, Blankenship D, Sonnenthal E, Kennedy M (2018a) Conceptual reservoir design at Fallon FORGE using geomechanical models with natural and induced fractures, in GRC transactions. In: Proceedings, geothermal resources council annual meeting and expo, Reno, Nevada, October 2018, vol 42, GRC

• Pettitt WS, Hazzard J, Riahi A, Maxwell S, Blankenship D (2018b) Simulated microseismicity in geomechanical models with natural and induced fractures. SEG Tech Progr Expand Abstr 2018:2992–2996

  Google Scholar 

• Podgorney RK, Finnila A, McLennan J, Ghassemi A, Huang H, Forbes B, Elliot J (2019) A framework for modeling and simulation of the Utah FORGE site. In: Proceedings, 44th workshop on geothermal reservoir engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, 11–13 February 2019, SGP-TR-214

• Pruess K, Narasimhan TN (1985) A practical method for modeling fluid and heat flow in fractured porous media. Soc Petrol Eng J 25(1):14–26

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Riahi A, Damjanac B (2013a) Numerical study of hydro-shearing in geothermal reservoirs with a pre-existing discrete fracture network. In: Proceedings, 38th workshop on geothermal reservoir engineering, Stanford University, SGP-TR-198, Stanford, California, 11–13 February

• Riahi A, Damjanac B (2013b) Numerical study of interaction between hydraulic fracture and discrete fracture network. In: Proceedings, international conference for effective and sustainable hydraulic fracturing in Brisbane, Australia, May

  Google Scholar 

• Riahi A, Damjanac B (2013c) Numerical study of the interaction between injection and the discrete fracture network in enhanced geothermal reservoirs. In: Proceedings, 47th US rock mechanics/geomechanics symposium, San Francisco, 20 June

• Riahi A, Damjanac B, Furtney J. (2014a) Thermo-hydro-mechanical numerical modeling of stimulation and heat production of EGS reservoirs. In: Proceedings, 48th US rock mechanics/geomechanics symposium, Minneapolis, Minnesota, June 2014, ARMA-2014-7741, Alexandria, Virginia: ARMA

• Riahi A, Furtney J, Damjanac B (2014b) Evaluation of optimum well positioning in enhanced geothermal reservoirs using numerical modeling. Transactions—geothermal resources council 38. In: Proceedings, 38th GRC meeting, Portland, Oregon, 28 September–1 October 2014, pp 325–330

• Riahi A, Varun, Damjanac B (2018) DFN Simplifying approaches applied to the discrete element modeling of EGS reservoirs, in DFNE 2018. In: Proceedings, 2nd international discrete fracture network engineering conference, Seattle, Washington, June 2018, 18–001213. ARMA

• Robinson PC (1983) Connectivity of fracture systems—a percolation theory approach. J Phys A Math Gen 16(3):605–614

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Robinson PC (1984) Numerical calculations of critical densities for lines and planes. J Phys A Math Gen 17(14):2823–2830

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Sanyal SK, Butler S, Swenson D, Hardeman B (2000) Review of the state-of-the-art of numerical simulation of enhanced geothermal systems. In: Proceedings, world geothermal conference, Kyushu, Tohoku, Japan, 29 May–10 June

• Savitski AA, Detournay E (2002) Propagation of a penny-shaped fluid-driven fracture in an impermeable rock: asymptotic solutions. Int J Solids Struct 39:6311–6337

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Sonnenthal E, Pettitt W, Smith T, Riahi M, Siler D, Kennedy M, Majer E, Dobson P, Ayling B, Blankenship D (2018) Continuum thermal-hydrological-mechanical modeling of the Fallon FORGE site, in GRC transactions. In: Proceedings, geothermal resources council annual meeting and expo, Reno, Nevada, October 2018, vol 42

• Suarez Arriaga MC, Samaniego VF, Rodriquez F (1996) Some mismatches occurred when simulating fractured reservoirs as homogeneous porous media. In: Proceedings, twenty-first workshop on geothermal reservoir engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, 179

• Swenson D, Schroeder R, Shinohara N, Okabe T (1999) Analyses of the Hijiori long term circulation test. In: Proceedings of the 24th workshop on geothermal reservoir engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, 25–27 January 1999, pp 344–351

• Walton I, McLennan J (2013) The role of natural fractures in shale gas production. In: Bunger AP, McLennan J, Jeffrey R (eds) Effective and sustainable hydraulic fracturing. https://doi.org/10.5772/45724, ISBN: 978-953-51-1137-5, InTech, 2013

  Google Scholar 

• Williamson KH (1990) Reservoir simulation of the Geysers geothermal field. In: Proceedings of the 15th workshop on geothermal reservoir engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, 23–25 January 1990, pp 113–123

• Yamaguchi S et al (2000) The numerical modeling study of the Hijiori HDR test site. In: Proc., world geothermal congress, Kyushu–Tohuku, Japan, 3975

Download references