[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content
Log in

Group operations and isomorphic relation with the 2-tuple linguistic variables

  • Foundations
  • Published:
Soft Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper aims to put forth the theory of 2-tuple linguistic groups concerning the binary operation in the conventional sense. For this, a formal methodology has been introduced to prove that a predefined nonempty linguistic term set, LT, and the interval, \([\frac{-1}{2},\frac{1}{2}]\), forms a group. Further, we have proved that a set of all 2-tuple linguistic information, \(\overline{LT} \equiv LT \times [\frac{-1}{2},\frac{1}{2}]\), and numerical interval, \([-n,n]\), where n is presumed to be a positive integer, also forms a group. Later on, we develop a one-to-one correspondence and homomorphic group relation between the set of all 2-tuple linguistic information and numerical interval, \([-n,n]\). Henceforth, a similarity relation between the two groups is obtained. Finally, a practical application is defined by proposing the notion of a 2-tuple linguistic bipolar graph to illustrate the usefulness and practicality of the group isomorphic relation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Akgül M (1988) Some properties of fuzzy groups. J Math Anal Appl 133(1):93–100

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Akram M (2011) Bipolar fuzzy graphs. Inf Sci 181(24):5548–5564

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Akram M, Dudek WA (2012) Regular bipolar fuzzy graphs. Neural Comput Appl 21:197–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-011-0772-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akram M, Karunambigai MG (2011) Metric in bipolar fuzzy graphs. World Appl Sci J 14(12):1920–1927

    Google Scholar 

  • Anthony JM, Sherwood H (1979) Fuzzy groups redefined. J Math Anal Appl 69(1):124–130

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Asaad M, Abou-Zaid S (1996) A contribution to the theory of fuzzy subgroups. Fuzzy Sets Syst 77(3):355–369

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya P (1987) Fuzzy subgroups: some characterizations. J Math Anal Appl 128(1):241–252

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya P, Mukherjee NP (1987) Fuzzy groups: some group theoretic analogs II. Inf Sci 41(1):77–91

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bonissone PP, Decker KS (1986) Selecting uncertainty calculi and granularity: An experiment in trading-off precision and complexity. In: Machine Intelligence and Pattern Recognition, vol. 4, North-Holland, pp 217–247

  • Bordogna G, Fedrizzi M, Pasi G (1997) A linguistic modeling of consensus in group decision making based on OWA operators. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern-Part A: Syst Humans 27(1):126–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Das PS (1981) Fuzzy groups and level subgroups. J Math Anal Appl 84(1):264–269

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • De Luca A, Termini S (1972) Algebraic properties of fuzzy sets. J Math Anal Appl 40(2):373–386

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Degang C, Jiashang J, Congxin W, Tsang EC (2005) Some notes on equivalent fuzzy sets and fuzzy subgroups. Fuzzy Sets Syst 152(2):403–409

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Degani R, Bortolan G (1988) The problem of linguistic approximation in clinical decision making. Int J Approx Reason 2(2):143–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Delgado M, Verdegay JL, Vila MA (1992) Linguistic decision making models. Int J Intell Syst 7(5):479–492

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Delgado M, Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Martínez L (1998) Combining numerical and linguistic information in group decision making. Inf Sci 107(1–4):177–194

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Demirci M, Recasens J (2004) Fuzzy groups, fuzzy functions and fuzzy equivalence relations. Fuzzy Sets Syst 144(3):441–458

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dietrich H, Wilson JB (2019) Isomorphism testing of groups of cube-free order. J Algebr 545:174–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalgebra.2019.02.008

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D, Prade H (1980) Fuzzy Sets and Systems: Theory and Applications. Kluwer Academic, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gallian J (2012) Contemporary abstract algebra. Nelson Education

  • Gupta KC, Sarma BK (1999) Nilpotent fuzzy groups. Fuzzy Sets Syst 101(1):167–176

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Harary F (1972) Graph Theory, 3rd edn. Addison-Wesley, Reading

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera F, Martínez L (2000) A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 8(6):746–752

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrera F, Martínez L (2001) The 2-tuple linguistic computational model advantages of its linguistic description, accuracy and consistency. Int J Uncertain Fuzziness Knowl-Based Syst 9(1):33–48

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Verdegay JL (1995) A sequential selection process in group decision making with linguistic assessment. Inf Sci 85(4):223–239

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Verdegay JL (1996) Direct approach processes in group decision making using linguistic OWA operators. Fuzzy Sets Syst 79(2):175–190

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kahrobaei D, Anshel M (2010) Applications of group theory in cryptography. Int J Pure Appl Math 58:21–23

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kim JG (1997) Some characterizations of fuzzy subgroups. Fuzzy Sets Syst 87(2):243–249

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kleiner I (1986) The evolution of group theory: A brief survey. Math Mag 59(4):195–215

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Klir GJ, Yuan B (1995) Fuzzy Sets an Fuzzy Logic: Theory and Applications, vol 4. Prentice-Hall PTR, USA

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Makamba BB (1992) Direct products and isomorphism of fuzzy subgroups. Inf Sci 65(1–2):33–43

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Malhotra T, Gupta A, Singh A (2019) Methodology for interval-valued matrix games with 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic information. In: International Conference on Numerical Computations: Theory and Algorithms (Springer), pp. 154–168

  • Mukherjee NP, Bhattacharya P (1984) Fuzzy normal subgroups and fuzzy cosets. Inf Sci 34(3):225–239

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Mukherjee NP, Bhattacharya P (1986) Fuzzy groups: Some group-theoretic analogs. Inf Sci 39(3):247–267

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Myasnikov A, Shpilrain V, Ushakov A (2008) Group-Based Cryptography. Birkhauser, Switzerland

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ovchinnikov S (1995) Continuous fuzzy groups. Fuzzy Sets Syst 76(2):253–257

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ray S (1992) Isomorphic fuzzy groups. Fuzzy Sets Syst 50(2):201–207

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ray AK (1999) On product of fuzzy subgroups. Fuzzy Sets Syst 105(1):181–183

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez-Lara BM, El-Ganainy R, Guerrero J (2018) Symmetry in optics and photonics: a group theory approach. Sci Bull 63(4):244–251

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld A (1971) Fuzzy groups. J Math Anal Appl 35(3):512–517

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Schweizer B, Sklar A (1960) Statistical metric spaces. Pacific J. Math. 10(1):313–334

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sherwood H (1983) Product of fuzzy subgroups. Fuzzy Sets Syst 11(1–3):79–89

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Tărnăuceanu M, Bentea L (2008) On the number of fuzzy subgroups of finite abelian groups. Fuzzy Sets Syst 159(9):1084–1096

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Tong RM, Bonissone PP (1980) A linguistic approach to decision making with fuzzy sets. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 10(11):716–723

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Tu L, Wenxiang G (1994) Abelian fuzzy group and its properties. Fuzzy Sets Syst 64(3):415–420

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Xu Z (2005) Deviation measures of linguistic preference relations in group decision making. Omega 33(3):249–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Yager RR (1981) A new methodology for ordinal multiobjective decisions based on fuzzy sets. Decis Sci 12(4):589–600. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1981.tb00111.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan X, Lee ES (2004) Fuzzy group based on fuzzy binary operation. Comput Math Appl 47(4–5):631–641

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8(3):338–353

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh LA (1975) The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning-I. Inf Sci 8:199–249

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh LA (1975) The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning-II. Inf Sci 8(4):301–357

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh LA (1975) The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning-III. Inf Sci 9(1):43–80

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh LA (1976) The linguistic approach and its application to decision analysis. In: Ho YC, Mitter SK (eds) Directions in Large-Scale Systems. Springer, Boston, pp 260–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang WR (1994) Bipolar fuzzy sets and relations: a computational framework for cognitive modeling and multiagent decision analysis. In: Proceedings of IEEE Conference pp. 305–309 https://doi.org/10.1109/IJCF.1994.375115

  • Zhang, WR (1998) Bipolar fuzzy sets. Proceedings of FUZZ-IEEE 835–840

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anjana Gupta.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Communicated by A. Di Nola.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Malhotra, T., Gupta, A. Group operations and isomorphic relation with the 2-tuple linguistic variables. Soft Comput 24, 18287–18300 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-020-05367-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-020-05367-9

Keywords

Navigation