Evaluation of research proposals for grant funding using interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets

• Atanassov K, Gargov G (1989) Interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 31(3):343–349

  Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Atanassova L (2008) On interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy versions of L. Zadeh’s extension principle. In: Atanassov K, Kacprzyk J, Krawczak M, Szmidt (eds) Issues in intuitionistic fuzzy sets and generalized nets, Warsaw, vol 7, pp 13–19

• Bloch C, Sørensen MP, Graversen EK, Schneider JW, Schmidt EK, Aagaard K, Mejlgaard N (2014) Developing a methodology to assess the impact of research grant funding: a mixed methods approach. Eval Progr Plan 43:105–117

• Chapin PG (2004) Research projects and research proposals. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  Google Scholar 

• Chen TY, Wang HP, Lu YY (2011) A multicriteria group decision-making approach based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets: a comparative perspective. Expert Syst Appl 38(6):7647–7658

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Denscombe M (2013) The role of research proposals in business and management education. Int J Manag Educ 11(3):142–149

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Fogelholm M, Leppinen S, Auvinen A, Raitanen J, Nuutinen A, Väänänen K (2012) Panel discussion does not improve reliability of peer review for medical research grant proposals. J Clin Epidemiol 65(1):47–52

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Galbraith CS, McKinney BC, DeNoble AF, Ehrlich SB (2014) The impact of presentation form, entrepreneurial passion, and perceived preparedness on obtaining grant funding. J Bus Tech Commun 28(2):222–248

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Geuna A, Martin BR (2003) University research evaluation and funding: an international comparison. Minerva 41(4):277–304

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hills PV, Dale AJ (1995) Research and technology evaluation in the United Kingdom. Res Eval 5(1):35–44

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hong LC, Fong S (2012) Presenting a research proposal: the examiners’ expectations. Proc Soc Behav Sci 66:537–543

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Jacob BA, Lefgren L (2011) The impact of research grant funding on scientific productivity. J Public Econ 95(9):1168–1177

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kahraman C, Ruan D, Dogan I (2003) Fuzzy group decision-making for facility location selection. Inf Sci 157:135–153

  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Kasvi JJ, Vartiainen M, Hailikari M (2003) Managing knowledge and knowledge competences in projects and project organisations. Int J Proj Manag 21(8):571–582

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kim S, Koo J, Lee YH (1999) Infrastructure and production efficiency: an analysis on the Korean manufacturing industry. Contemp Econ Policy 17(3):390–400

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kondolf GM (1995) Five elements for effective evaluation of stream restoration. Restor Ecol 3(2):133–136

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Li DF (2011) Extension principles for interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets and algebraic operations. Fuzzy Optim Decis Mak 10(1):45–58

  Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Lichtenberg FR (1987) The effect of government funding on private industrial research and development: a re-assessment. J Ind Econ 36:97–104

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Iutcovich JM, Iutcovich M (1987) The politics of evaluation research. A case study of community development block grant funding for human services. Eval Progr Plan 10(1):71–81

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ogden TE, Goldberg IA (eds) (2002) Research proposals: a guide to success. Academic Press, San Diego

  Google Scholar 

• Oral M, Kettani O, Ç\(\imath \)nar Ü (2001) Project evaluation and selection in a network of collaboration: a consensual disaggregation multi-criterion approach. Eur J Oper Res 130(2):332–346

• Punch KF (2006) Developing effective research proposals. SAGE, London

  Google Scholar 

• Santos-Vijande ML, Álvarez-González LI (2007) Innovativeness and organizational innovation in total quality oriented firms: the moderating role of market turbulence. Technovation 27(9):514–532

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Silyn-Roberts H (2013) A research proposal. In: Silyn-Roberts H (ed) Writing for science and engineering, 2nd edn. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 75–82. doi:10.1016/B978-0-08-098285-4.00005-4

• Sugeno M, Kang GT (1986) Fuzzy modelling and control of multilayer incinerator. Fuzzy Sets Syst 18(3):329–345

  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Tang SL (2003) Economic feasibility of projects: managerial and engineering practice. Chinese University Press, Hong Kong

  Google Scholar 

• Thomas D, Nedeva M (2012) Characterizing researchers to study research funding agency impacts: the case of the European Research Council’s Starting Grants. Res Eval 21(4):257–269

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ward D (2010) Effective grants management. Jones & Bartlett Publishers, Sudbury

  Google Scholar 

• Willcocks L, Lester S (1991) Information systems investments: evaluation at the feasibility stage of projects. Technovation 11(5):283–302

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Xu Z (2010) A method based on distance measure for interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making. Inf Sci 180(1):181–190

  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Xu ZS, Chen J (2007) Approach to group decision making based on interval valued intuitionistic judgment matrices. Syst Eng Theory Pract 27(4):126–133

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Zimmermann HJ (1992) Fuzzy set theory and its applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (second revised edition)

  Google Scholar 

• Zhu JJ, Wang HH, Ye C, Lang Q (2014) Project evaluation method using non-formatted text information based on multi-granular linguistic labels. Inf Fusion 24:93–107

Download references