[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Bioelectrical impedance analysis versus reference methods in the assessment of body composition in athletes

  • Invited Review
  • Published:
European Journal of Applied Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present systematic review aimed to compare the accuracy of Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA) and Bioelectrical Impedance Vector Analysis (BIVA) vs. reference methods for the assessment of body composition in athletes. Studies were identified based on a systematic search of internationally electronic databases (PubMed and Scopus) and hand searching of the reference lists of the included studies. In total, 42 studies published between 1988 and 2021 were included. The methodological quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-sectional Studies as recommended by the National Institute of Health. Twenty-three studies had an overall good rating in terms of quality, while 13 were rated as fair and 6 as poor, resulting in a low to moderate risk of bias. Fat mass was inconsistently determined using BIA vs. the reference methods, regardless of the BIA-technology. When using the foot to hand technology with predictive equations for athletes, a good agreement between BIA and the reference methods was observed for fat-free mass, total body, intra and extra cellular water. However, an underestimation in fat-free mass and body fluids was found when using generalized predictive equations. Classic and Specific BIVA represented a valid approach for assessing body fluids (Classic BIVA) and percentage of fat mass (Specific BIVA). The present systematic review suggests that BIA and BIVA can be used for assessing body composition in athletes, provided that foot-to-hand technology, predictive equations, and BIVA references for athletes are used.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

BIA:

Bioelectrical impedance analysis

BIVA:

Bioelectrical impedance vector analysis

BIS:

Bioelectrical spectroscopy analysis

DXA:

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry

ECW:

Extracellular water

FM:

Fat mass

FFM:

Fat free mass

ICW:

Intracellular water

LST:

Lean soft tissue

R:

Resistance

Xc:

Reactance

TBW:

Total body water

UWW:

Underwater weighting

4C:

Four compartment model

References

Download references

Funding

This research project received no external funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giuseppe Coratella.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. Availability of data and material: not applicable.

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Additional information

Communicated by Michael I Lindinger.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 66 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Campa, F., Gobbo, L.A., Stagi, S. et al. Bioelectrical impedance analysis versus reference methods in the assessment of body composition in athletes. Eur J Appl Physiol 122, 561–589 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-021-04879-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-021-04879-y

Keywords

Navigation