Abstract.
In an attempt to understand the antihyperglycemic action of caffeic acid, the myoblast C2C12 cells were employed to investigate the glucose uptake in the present study. Caffeic acid enhanced the uptake of radioactive glucose into C2C12 cells in a concentration-dependent manner. Similar effect of phenylephrine on the uptake of radioactive glucose was also observed in C2C12 cells. Prazosin attenuated the action of caffeic acid in a way parallel to the blockade of phenylephrine. Effect of caffeic acid on α1-adrenoceptors was further supported by the displacement of [3H]prazosin binding in C2C12 cells. Moreover, the glucose uptake-increasing action of phenylephrine in C2C12 cells was inhibited by the antagonists of α1A-adrenoceptors, both tamsulosin and WB 4101, but not by the antagonist of α1B-adrenoceptors, chlorethylclonidine (CEC). The presence of α1A-adrenoceptors in C2C12 cells can thus be considered. Similar inhibition of the action of caffeic acid was also obtained in C2C12 cells co-incubating these antagonists. An activation of α1A-adrenoceptors seems responsible for the action of caffeic acid in C2C12 cells. In the presence of U73312, the specific inhibitor of phospholipase C, caffeic acid-stimulated uptake of radioactive glucose into C2C12 cells was reduced in a concentration-dependent manner and it was not affected by U73343, the negative control of U73312. Moreover, chelerythrine and GF 109203X diminished the action of caffeic acid at concentrations sufficient to inhibit protein kinase C. Therefore, the obtained data suggest that an activation of α1A-adrenoceptors in C2C12 cells by caffeic acid may increase the glucose uptake via phospholipase C-protein kinase C pathway.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Electronic Publication
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cheng, JT., Liu, IM. Stimulatory effect of caffeic acid on α1A-adrenoceptors to increase glucose uptake into cultured C2C12 cells. Naunyn-Schmied Arch Pharmacol 362, 122–127 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s002100000274
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002100000274