[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content
Log in

A penalized simulated maximum likelihood method to estimate parameters for SDEs with measurement error

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Computational Statistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The penalized simulated maximum likelihood (PSML) approach can be used to estimate parameters for a stochastic differential equation model based on completely or partially observed discrete-time observations. The PSML uses an auxiliary variable importance sampler and parameters are estimated in a penalized maximum likelihood framework. In this paper, we extend the PSML to allow for measurement error, including unknown initial conditions. Simulation studies for two stochastic models and a real world example aimed at understanding the dynamics of chronic wasting disease illustrate that our method has favorable performance in the presence of measurement error. PSML reduces both the bias and root mean squared error as compared to existing methods. Lastly, we establish consistency and asymptotic normality for the proposed estimators.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aït-Sahalia Y (2002) Transition densities for interest rate and other nonlinear diffusions. J Finance 54(4):1361–1395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aït-Sahalia Y (2008) Closed-form likelihood expansions for multivariate diffusions. Ann Stat 2(36):906–937

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bengtsson T, Snyder C, Nychka D (2003) Toward a nonlinear ensemble filter for high-dimensional systems. J Geophys Res 108(D24):8775. https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002900

  • Billingsley P (1961) Statistical inference for Markov processes, vol 2. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Donnet S, Foulley J-L, Samson A (2010) Bayesian analysis of growth curves using mixed models defined by stochastic differential equations. Biometrics 66(3):733–741

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Durham G, Gallant A (2002) Numerical techniques for maximum likelihood estimation of continuous-time diffusion processes. J Bus Econ Stat 20(3):297–338

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Eraker B (2001) MCMC analysis of diffusion models with application to finance. J Bus Econ Stat 19(2):177–191

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs C (2013) Inference for diffusion processes: with applications in life sciences. Springer, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Geremia C, Miller MW, Hoeting JA, Antolin MF, Hobbs NT (2015) Bayesian modeling of prion disease dynamics in mule deer using population monitoring and capture-recapture data. PloS One 10(10):e0140687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golightly A, Wilkinson DJ (2005) Bayesian inference for stochastic kinetic models using a diffusion approximation. Biometrics 61(3):781–788

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Golightly A, Wilkinson DJ (2006) Bayesian sequential inference for nonlinear multivariate diffusions. Stat Comput 16(4):323–338

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Golightly A, Wilkinson DJ (2008) Bayesian inference for nonlinear multivariate diffusion models observed with error. Comput Stat Data Anal 52(3):1674–1693

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Golightly A, Wilkinson DJ (2011) Bayesian parameter inference for stochastic biochemical network models using particle Markov chain Monte Carlo. Interface Focus 1(6):807–820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kloeden P, Platen E (1992) Numerical solution of stochastic differential equations. Springer, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lindström E (2012) A regularized bridge sampler for sparsely sampled diffusions. Stat Comput 22(2):615–623

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz EN (1963) Deterministic nonperiodic flow. J Atmos Sci 20(2):130–141

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Miller M, Hobbs N, Tavener S (2006) Dynamics of prion disease transmission in mule deer. Ecol Appl 16(6):2208–2214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen A (1995a) Consistency and asymptotic normality of an approximate maximum likelihood estimator for discretely observed diffusion processes. Bernoulli 1(3):257–279

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen A (1995b) A new approach to maximum likelihood estimation for stochastic differential equations based on discrete observations. Scand J Stat 22(1):55–71

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Pitt MK, Shephard N (1999) Filtering via simulation: auxiliary particle filters. J Am Stat Assoc 94(446):590–599

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Särkkä S, Sottinen T (2008) Application of Girsanov theorem to particle filtering of discretely observed continuous-time non-linear systems. Bayesian Anal 3(3):555–584

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Stramer O, Yan J (2007) On simulated likelihood of discretely observed diffusion processes and comparison to closed-form approximation. J Comput Graph Stat 16(3):672–691

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Sun L, Lee C, Hoeting JA (2015a) Parameter inference and model selection in deterministic and stochastic dynamical models via approximate Bayesian computation: modeling a wildlife epidemic. Environmetrics 26(7):451–462

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Sun L, Lee C, Hoeting JA (2015b) A penalized simulated maximum likelihood approach in parameter estimation for stochastic differential equations. Comput Stat Data Anal 84:54–67

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. EF-0914489 (Sun and Hoeting). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. The research work of Chihoon Lee is supported in part by the Army Research Office under Grant No. W911NF-14-1-0216. This research also utilized the CSU ISTeC Cray HPS System, which is supported by NSF Grant CSN-0923386. We are grateful to N. Thompson Hobbs for fruitful discussions and Michael W. Miller and the Colorado Division of Parks and Wildlife for sharing the data. We also appreciate the reviewers for their insightful suggestions that have greatly enhanced the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Libo Sun.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sun, L., Lee, C. & Hoeting, J.A. A penalized simulated maximum likelihood method to estimate parameters for SDEs with measurement error. Comput Stat 34, 847–863 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00180-018-0846-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00180-018-0846-3

Keywords

Navigation