[go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Multi-channel sensor fusion for real-time bearing fault diagnosis by frequency-domain multilinear principal component analysis

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Real-time health condition monitoring of bearings plays a significant role in the functionality of the rotary machinery. Multi-channel sensor fusion can be more robust for identifying diverse bearing fault diagnosis scenarios. However, the high-dimensional data and complex fault scenarios that can occur in the system pose significant challenges for effective fault diagnosis. State-of-the-art artificial intelligence-based bearing fault diagnosis system involves multi-channel sensor fusion, which usually leverages time–frequency analysis, feature extraction, and supervised learning. Nevertheless, those methods usually require a large training dataset for the machine learning model development. This paper proposes a new multi-channel sensor fusion methodology, named frequency-domain multilinear principal component analysis (FDMPCA), by integrating acoustics and vibration signals with different sampling rates and limited training data. Frequency analysis is firstly leveraged to transform the original signals from time to frequency domain, and the frequency responses of heterogeneous channels form a tensor structure named the frequency-domain (FD) tensor. Subsequently, the FD tensor is decomposed by multilinear principal component analysis (MPCA), resulting in low-dimensional process features for fault diagnosis. Finally, the extracted features can be used to train a Neural Network (NN) model for fault diagnosis. To validate the effectiveness of the proposed method, the bearing fault experiments were conducted on a machinery fault simulator while multiple vibration and acoustic signals were collected. Experimental results demonstrated that the proposed approach can effectively identify the machine fault conditions and outperform the benchmark methods given the limited training data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. AlShorman O, Irfan M, Saad N, Zhen D, Haider N, Glowacz A, AlShorman A (2020) A review of artificial intelligence methods for condition monitoring and fault diagnosis of rolling element bearings for induction motor. Shock Vib 2020(8843759):1–20. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8843759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Tiboni M, Remino C, Bussola R, Amici C (2022) A review on vibration-based condition monitoring of rotating machinery. Appl Sci 12(3):972. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12030972

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wang Z, Lu C, Zhou B (2018) Fault diagnosis for rotary machinery with selective ensemble neural networks. Mech Syst Signal Process 113:112–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.03.051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lu C, Wang Y, Ragulskis M, Cheng Y (2016) Fault diagnosis for rotating machinery: a method based on image processing. PLoS ONE 11(10):1–22. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0164111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Maleki E, Belkadi F, Boli N, van der Zwaag BJ, Alexopoulos K, Koukas S, Marin-Perianu M, Bernard A, Mourtzis D (2018) Ontology-based framework enabling smart product-service systems: application of sensing systems for machine health monitoring. IEEE Internet Things J 5(6):4496–4505. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2018.2831279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Yan X, Liu Y, Jia M (2020) Multiscale cascading deep belief network for fault identification of rotating machinery under various working conditions. Knowl-Based Syst 193:105484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2020.105484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Luo RC, Chang CC, Lai CC (2011) Multisensor fusion and integration: theories, applications, and its perspectives. IEEE Sens J 11(12):3122–3138. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2011.2166383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Baydar N, Ball A (2003) Detection of gear failures via vibration and acoustic signals using wavelet transform. Mech Syst Signal Process 17(4):787–804. https://doi.org/10.1006/mssp.2001.1435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Henriquez P, Alonso JB, Ferrer MA, Travieso CM (2014) Review of automatic fault diagnosis systems using audio and vibration signals. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybernetics: Syst 44(5):642–652. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCC.2013.2257752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tandon N, Nakra BC (1992) Comparison of vibration and acoustic measurement techniques for the condition monitoring of rolling element bearings. Tribol Int 25(3):205–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-679X(92)90050-W

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Banerjee TP, Das S (2012) Multi-sensor data fusion using support vector machine for motor fault detection. Inf Sci 217:96–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2012.06.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kateris D, Moshou D, Pantazi X-E, Gravalos I, Sawalhi N, Loutridis S (2014) A machine learning approach for the condition monitoring of rotating machinery. J Mech Sci Technol 28(1):61–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-013-1102-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sikder N, Bhakta K, Al Nahid A, Islam MMM (2019)\ Fault diagnosis of motor bearing using ensemble learning algorithm with FFT-based preprocessing. 1st International Conference on Robotics, Electrical and Signal Processing Techniques, ICREST 2019:564–569. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICREST.2019.8644089

  14. Vakharia V, Gupta VK, Kankar PK (2015) Ball bearing fault diagnosis using supervised and unsupervised machine learning methods. Int J Acoust Vib 20(4):244–250. https://doi.org/10.20855/ijav.2015.20.4387

  15. Gunerkar RS, Jalan AK (2019) Classification of ball bearing faults using vibro-acoustic sensor data fusion. Exp Tech 43(5):635–643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40799-019-00324-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang X, Mao D, Li X (2021) Bearing fault diagnosis based on vibro-acoustic data fusion and 1D-CNN network. Meas: J Int Meas Confederation 173(June 2020):108518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2020.108518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hang Q, Yang J, Xing L (2019) Diagnosis of rolling bearing based on classification for high dimensional unbalanced data. IEEE Access 7:79159–79172. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2919406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kolar D, Lisjak D, Pajak M, Gudlin M (2021) Intelligent fault diagnosis of rotary machinery by convolutional neural network with automatic hyper-parameters tuning using bayesian optimization. Sensors 21(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/s21072411

  19. Mian T, Choudhary A, Fatima S (2021) A sensor fusion based approach for bearing fault diagnosis of rotating machine. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part O: J Risk Reliab 1–15.https://doi.org/10.1177/1748006X211044843

  20. Wang X, Mao D, Li X (2021) Bearing fault diagnosis based on vibro-acoustic data fusion and 1D-CNN network. Measurement 173(June 2020):108518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2020.108518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Yang BS, Kim KJ (2006) Application of Dempster-Shafer theory in fault diagnosis of induction motors using vibration and current signals. Mech Syst Signal Process 20(2):403–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2004.10.010

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Duan Z, Wu T, Guo S, Shao T, Malekian R, Li Z (2018) Development and trend of condition monitoring and fault diagnosis of multi-sensors information fusion for rolling bearings: a review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 96(1–4):803–819. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-1474-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Jardine AKS, Lin D, Banjevic D (2006) A review on machinery diagnostics and prognostics implementing condition-based maintenance. Mech Syst Signal Process 20(7):1483–1510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2005.09.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Li X, Zhang W, Ding Q, Sun J-Q (2020) Intelligent rotating machinery fault diagnosis based on deep learning using data augmentation. J Intell Manuf 31(2):433–452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-018-1456-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Li Y, Du X, Wan F, Wang X, Yu H (2020) Rotating machinery fault diagnosis based on convolutional neural network and infrared thermal imaging. Chin J Aeronaut 33(2):427–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2019.08.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Currano LJ, Bauman S, Churaman W, Peckerar M, Wienke J, Kim S, Yu M, Balachandran B (2008) Latching ultra-low power MEMS shock sensors for acceleration monitoring. Sens Actuators, A 147(2):490–497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2008.06.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Van Tran H, Ngo TH, Tran NDK, Dang TN, Dao TP, Wang DA (2018) A threshold accelerometer based on a tristable mechanism. Mechatronics 53(May):39–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechatronics.2018.05.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wang T, Lu G, Yan P (2020) A novel statistical time-frequency analysis for rotating machine condition monitoring. IEEE Trans Industr Electron 67(1):531–541. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2019.2896109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Chen S, Meng Y, Tang H, Tian Y, He N, Shao C (2020) Robust deep learning-based diagnosis of mixed faults in rotating machinery. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron 25(5):2167–2176. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMECH.2020.3007441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hao S, Ge F, Li Y, Jiang J (2020) Multisensor bearing fault diagnosis based on one-dimensional convolutional long short-term memory networks. Measurement 159:107802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2020.107802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Junior RFR, Areias dos Santos IA, Campos MM, Teixeira CE, da Silva LEB, Gomes GF (2022) Fault detection and diagnosis in electric motors using 1d convolutional neural networks with multi-channel vibration signals. Meas: J Int Meas Conf 190(January):12–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2022.110759

  32. Stavropoulos P, Papacharalampopoulos A, Souflas T (2020) Indirect online tool wear monitoring and model-based identification of process-related signal. Adv Mech Eng 12(5):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814020919209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Duro JA, Padget JA, Bowen CR, Kim HA, Nassehi A (2016) Multi-sensor data fusion framework for CNC machining monitoring. Mech Syst Signal Process 66–67:505–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2015.04.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Yao Y, Wang H, Li S, Liu Z, Gui G, Dan Y, Hu J (2018) End-to-end convolutional neural network model for gear fault diagnosis based on sound signals. Appl Sci 8(9):1584. https://doi.org/10.3390/app8091584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Ciampa F, Mahmoodi P, Pinto F, Meo M (2018) Recent advances in active infrared thermography for non-destructive testing of aerospace components. Sensors 18(2):609. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18020609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Grammatikos SA, Kordatos EZ, Matikas TE, Paipetis AS (2018) On the fatigue response of a bonded repaired aerospace composite using thermography. Compos Struct 188(November 2017):461–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.01.035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Laborda A, Robinson A, Wang S, Zhang Y, Reed P (2018) Fatigue assessment of multilayer coatings using lock-in thermography. Mater Des 141:361–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2018.01.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Janssens O, Schulz R, Slavkovikj V, Stockman K, Loccufier M, Van De Walle R, Van Hoecke S (2015) Thermal image based fault diagnosis for rotating machinery. Infrared Phys Technol 73:78–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infrared.2015.09.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Shao H, Li W, Xia M, Zhang Y, Shen C, Williams D, Kennedy A, De Silva CW (2021) Fault diagnosis of a rotor-bearing system under variable rotating speeds using two-stage parameter transfer and infrared thermal images. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 70.https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2021.3111977

  40. Gravina R, Alinia P, Ghasemzadeh H, Fortino G (2017) Multi-sensor fusion in body sensor networks: state-of-the-art and research challenges. Information Fusion 35:1339–1351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2016.09.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Miao Q, Makis V (2007) Condition monitoring and classification of rotating machinery using wavelets and hidden Markov models. Mech Syst Signal Process 21(2):840–855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2006.01.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Prasad T, Das S (2012) Multi-sensor data fusion using support vector machine for motor fault detection 217:96–107.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2012.06.016

  43. Liu Q, Wang HP (2001) A case study on multisensor data fusion for imbalance diagnosis of rotating machinery. Artif Intell Eng Des Anal Manuf: AIEDAM 15(3):203–210. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0890060401153011

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  44. Stavropoulos P, Papacharalampopoulos A, Sabatakakis K, Mourtzis D (2021) Quality monitoring of manufacturing processes based on full data utilization. Procedia CIRP 104:1656–1661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2021.11.279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Zebari R, Abdulazeez A, Zeebaree D, Zebari D, Saeed J (2020) A comprehensive review of dimensionality reduction techniques for feature selection and feature extraction. J Appl Sci Technol Trends 1(2):56–70. https://doi.org/10.38094/jastt1224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Li W, Gu F, Ball AD, Leung AYT, Phipps CE (2001) A study of the noise from diesel engines using the independent component analysis. Mech Syst Signal Process 15(6):1165–1184. https://doi.org/10.1006/mssp.2000.1366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Wang F, Sun J, Yan D, Zhang S, Cui L, Xu Y (2015) A feature extraction method for fault classification of rolling bearing based on PCA. J Phys: Conf Ser 628(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/628/1/012079

  48. Yuan Y, Chen C (2020) Fault detection of rolling bearing based on principal component analysis and empirical mode decomposition. AIMS Mathematics 5(6):5916–5938. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2020379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Zhang K, Li Y, Scarf P, Ball A (2011) Feature selection for high-dimensional machinery fault diagnosis data using multiple models and radial basis function networks. Neurocomputing 74(17):2941–2952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2011.03.043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Hu C, He S, Wang Y (2021) A classification method to detect faults in a rotating machinery based on kernelled support tensor machine and multilinear principal component analysis. Appl Intell 51(4):2609–2621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-020-02011-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Wu Y, Yang F, Liu Y, Zha X, Yuan S (2018) A comparison of 1-D and 2-D deep convolutional neural networks in ECG classification. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 48–51. http://arxiv.org/abs/1810.07088

  52. Hoang DT, Kang HJ (2019) Rolling element bearing fault diagnosis using convolutional neural network and vibration image. Cogn Syst Res 53:42–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2018.03.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Shao H, Jiang H, Zhao H, Wang F (2017) A novel deep autoencoder feature learning method for rotating machinery fault diagnosis. Mech Syst Signal Process 95:187–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.03.034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Dasarathy BV (1997) Sensor fusion potential exploitation-innovative architectures and illustrative applications. Proc IEEE 85(1):24–38. https://doi.org/10.1109/5.554206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Wang T, Lu G, Yan P (2019) Multi-sensors based condition monitoring of rotary machines: an approach of multidimensional time-series analysis. Meas: J Int Meas Confederation 134:326–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2018.10.089

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Wang HF, Wang JP (2000) Fault diagnosis theory: method and application based on multisensor data fusion. J Test Eval 28(6):513–518. https://doi.org/10.1520/jte12143j

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  57. Planet S, Iriondo I (2012) Comparison between decision-level and feature-level fusion of acoustic and linguistic features for spontaneous emotion recognition. 7th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI 2012), June 2166–0735

  58. Huang M, Liu Z, Tao Y (2020) Mechanical fault diagnosis and prediction in IoT based on multi-source sensing data fusion. Simulation Model Pract Theory 102(July2 019):101981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2019.101981

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Guo H, Zhang Q, Nandi AK (2008) Feature extraction and dimensionality reduction by genetic programming based on the Fisher criterion. Expert Syst 25(5):444–459. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0394.2008.00451.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Gunerkar RS, Jalan AK, Belgamwar SU (2019) Fault diagnosis of rolling element bearing based on artificial neural network. J Mech Sci Technol 33(2):505–511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-019-0103-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Wu J, Hao XC, Xiong ZL, Lei H (2019) Hyperparameter optimization for machine learning models based on Bayesian optimization. J Electr Sci Technol 17(1):26–40. https://doi.org/10.11989/JEST.1674-862X.80904120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Lu H, Plataniotis KN, Venetsanopoulos AN (2008) MPCA: Multilinear principal component analysis of tensor objects. IEEE Trans Neural Networks. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNN.2007.901277

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, Mississippi, 39762, USA

    Abdullah Al Mamun, Mahathir Mohammad Bappy, Ayantha Senanayaka Mudiyanselage, Linkan Bian & Wenmeng Tian

  2. Department of Aerospace Engineering, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, Mississippi, 39762, USA

    Jiali Li & Zhipeng Jiang

  3. Center for Advanced Vehicular Systems, Mississippi State University, Starkville, Mississippi, 39759, USA

    Sara Fuller, Linkan Bian & Wenmeng Tian

  4. Institute for Systems Engineering Research, Mississippi State University, Vicksburg, MS, 39180, USA

    T. C. Falls

  5. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Virginia Tech, Virginia, Blacksburg, 24061, USA

    Zhenhua Tian

Authors
  1. Abdullah Al Mamun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mahathir Mohammad Bappy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ayantha Senanayaka Mudiyanselage
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jiali Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Zhipeng Jiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Zhenhua Tian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Sara Fuller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. T. C. Falls
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Linkan Bian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Wenmeng Tian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Experimental setup and data collection were performed jointly by Abdullah Al Manum, Ayantha Senanayaka Mudiyanselage, Jiali Li, and Zhipeng Jiang, and the methodology was developed jointly by Abdullah Al Manum, Mahathir Mohammad Bappy, and Wenmeng Tian. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Abdullah Al Manum, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wenmeng Tian.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Annex

Annex

Figure 11 illustrates the algorithm for implementing the MPCA algorithm, which is adapted from Lu et al. [62].

Fig. 11
figure 11

MPCA projection matrix estimation

Full size image

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Al Mamun, A., Bappy, M.M., Mudiyanselage, A.S. et al. Multi-channel sensor fusion for real-time bearing fault diagnosis by frequency-domain multilinear principal component analysis. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 124, 1321–1334 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-10525-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-10525-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation