[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

A framework for inductive learning based on subsumption lattices

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Artificial Intelligence: Methodology, Systems, and Applications (AIMSA 1998)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1480))

Abstract

In the present paper we propose an approach to inductive machine learning based on a consistent integration of the generalization-based (such as inductive learning from examples) and metric-based (such as agglomerative clustering) approaches. The approach stems from the natural idea (formally studied within the lattice theory) to estimate the similarity between two objects in a hierarchical structure by the distances to their closest common parent. The hierarchies used are the subsumption lattices induced by the generalization operations (e.g. lgg) commonly used in inductive learning. Using some basic results from the theory the paper shows how the corresponding ML techniques can be combined and extended in order to define a unified framework for solving some of the basic inductive learning tasks. An algorithm for this purpose is proposed and its performance is illustrated by examples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. D. Aha, D. Kibler, and M. Albert. Instance-based learning algorithms. Machine Learning, 6:37–66, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. Champesme, P. Brézellec, and H. Soldano. Empirically conservative search space reduction. In L. D. Raedt, editor, Proceedings of ILP-95, pages 387–401. Dept. of Computer Science, K.U.Leuven, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  3. P. Cheeseman, J. Kelly, M. Self, J. Stutz, W. Taylor, and D. Freeman. AutoClass: a Bayesian classification system. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Workshop on Machine Learning, Ann Arbor, pages 54–64, San Mateo, CA, 1988. Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  4. D. Conklin and I. Witten. Complexity-based induction. Machine Learning, 16(3):203–225, 1994.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. J. H. Gennari, P. Langley, and D. Fisher. Model of incremental concept formation. In J. G. Carbonell, editor, Machine Learinng: paradigms and methods. MIT Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. Hutchinson. Metrics on terms and clauses. In M. van Someren and G. Widmer, editors, Machine Learning: ECML-97, volume 1224 of Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, pages 138–145. Springer-Verlag, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  7. R. Michalski and R. Chilausky. Learning by being told and learning from examples: An experimental comparison of the two methods of knowledge acquisition in the context of developing an expert system for soybean disease diagnosis. International Journal of Policy Analysis and Information Systems, 4(2), 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. Michalski and R. Stepp. Learning from observation: conceptual clustering. In Michalski, Carbonell, and Mitchell, editors, Machine Learning: Artificial Intelligence Approach, volume 1, pages 331–363. Tioga, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  9. T. M. Mitchell. Generalization as search. Artificial Intelligence, 18:203–226, 1982.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. B. Monjardet. Metrics on partially ordered sets — a survey. Discrete Mathematics, 35:173–184, 1981.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. G. D. Plotkin. A note on inductive generalization. Machine Intelligence, 5:153–163, 1970.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. J. C. Reynolds. Transformational systems and the algebraic structure of atomic formulas. Machine Intelligence, 5:135–153, 1970.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. E. Y. Shapiro. Algorithmic program debugging. MIT Press, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  14. S. B. Thrun et al. The MONK's problems — a performance comparison of different learning algorithms. Technical Report CS-CMU-91-197, Carnegie Mellon University, Dec. 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  15. P. R. J. van der Laag. An Analysis of Refinement Operators in Inductive Logic Programming. PhD thesis, Tinbergen Institute Research, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Fausto Giunchiglia

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Markov, Z., Pelov, N. (1998). A framework for inductive learning based on subsumption lattices. In: Giunchiglia, F. (eds) Artificial Intelligence: Methodology, Systems, and Applications. AIMSA 1998. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1480. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0057457

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0057457

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-64993-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-49793-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics