A priori registration of SPECT projections and MR / CT images for SPECT reconstruction improvement

1. L.K. Arata and A.P. Dhawan. Iterative principal axes registration: a new algorithm for retrospective correlation of MR-PET brain images. In IEEE EMBS'92, pages 2776–2777, Paris, November 1992.

   Google Scholar 

2. J.E. Bowsher and C.E. Floyd. Treatment of Compton scattering in maximum likelihood, expectation maximization reconstructions of SPECT images. J. Nucl. Med., 32, 1991.

   Google Scholar 

3. E. Cuchet. Registration in neurosurgery and neuroradiotheraphie applications. In MRCAS'95, pages 31–37, Baltimore, 1995. Wiley.

   Google Scholar 

4. L. Desbat. Efficient sampling on coarse grids in tomography. Inverse problems, 9:251–269, 1993.

   Article  Google Scholar 

5. L. Desbat and D. Girard. The “minimum reconstruction-error” choice of regularization parameters: some more efficient methods and their application to deconvolution problems. SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 16(6):1387–1403, 1995.

   Article  Google Scholar 

6. Q. Donner. Correction de l'atténuation et du rayonnement diffusé en tomographie d'émission à simples photons. PhD thesis, LETI, Grenoble, 1994.

   Google Scholar 

7. R.D. Evans. Encyclopedia of physics (Compton effect). S. Flugge, 1985.

   Google Scholar 

8. E.C. Floyd, Jr. Ronald, J. Jaxzczak, K.L. Greer, and R.E. Coleman. Deconvolution of Compton scatter in SPECT J. Nucl. Med., 26, 1985.

   Google Scholar 

9. A. Francois-Joubert, O. Peria, S. Lavallee, S. Grand, P. Cinquin, and J.F. Le Bas. 3D registration of brain nuclear medicine and magnetic resonance images. In European Journal of Nuclear Medicine, page 964, Lausanne, october 1993.

   Google Scholar 

10. M.C. Gilardi, V. Bettinardi, A. Todd-Pokropek, and L. Milanesi. Assessment and comparison of three scatter correction techniques in SPECT J. Nucl. Med., 29 1988.

    Google Scholar 

11. W. E. L. Grimson, T. Lozano-Perez, W. M. Wells, G. J. Ettinger, S. J. White, and R. Kikinis. An automatic registration method for frameless stereotaxy, image guided surgery, and enhanced reality visualization. In CVPR'94, pages 430–436, Seattle, Washington, June 1994. IEEE Computer Society.

    Google Scholar 

12. A. Hamadeh, P. Sautot, S. Lavallee, and P. Cinquin. Towards automatic registration between CT and X-ray images: cooperation between 3D/2D registration and 2D edge detection. In MRCAS95, pages 39–46, Baltimore, MA, nov. 1995. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

13. D. J. Hawkes, D. L. G. Hill, E. D. Lehman, G. P. Robison, M.N. Maisey, and A. C. F. Colchester. Preliminary work on the interpretation of SPECT images with the aid of registered MR images and MR derived neuro-anatomical atlas. In 3D imaging in medicine, volume 60, pages 241–251. Springer-Verlag, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

14. C.J. Henri, A.C. Colchester, J. Zhao, D.J. Hawkes, D.L. Hill, and R. Evans. Registration of 3D surface data for intra-operative guidance and visualization in frameless stereotactic neurosurgery. In CVRMED'95, Lecture notes in computer science, 905, pages 47–56. Springer, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

15. Henry Stark. Image Recovery Theory and Applications. Academic Press, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

16. G.T. Herman. Image Reconstruction from Projections. New York: Academic, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

17. B.L. Holman, R.E. Zimmernan, K.A. Jonhson, P.A. Carvalho, R.B. Schwartz, J.S. Loeffler, E. Alexander, C.A. Pelizzari, and G.T.Y. Chen. Computer-assisted superimposition of magnetic resonance and high-resolution technnecium-99m-hmpao and thallium-201 spect images of the brain. J. Nucl. Medicine, 32:1478–1484, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

18. H. Jiang, R.A. Robb, and K.S. Holton. A new approach to 3-D registration of multimodality medical images by surface matching. In SPIE vol. 1808 Visualization in Biomedical Computing, pages 196–213, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

19. S. Lavallee, R. Szeliski, and L. Brunie. Anatomy-based registration of 3-D medical images, range images, X-ray projections, 3-D models using Octree-Splines. In Computer Integrated Surgery, pages 115–143. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

20. M. Ljungberg and S.E. Strand. Scatter and attenuation correction in SPECT using density maps and Monte Carlo simulated scatter functions. J. Nucl. Med., 31, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

21. M. Ljungberg and S.E. Strand. Attenuation and scatter correction in SPECT for sources in a nonhomogeneous object: a Monte Carlo study. J. Nucl. Med., 32, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

22. G. Malandain and J.M. Rocchisani. Registration of 3D medical images using a mechanical based method. In IEEE EMBS — 3D Advanced Image Processing in Medicine, pages 91–95, Rennes, France, Nov. 1992.

    Google Scholar 

23. F. Natterer. The Mathematics of Computerized Tomography. Wiley, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

24. C.A. Pelizzari, G.T.Y. Chen, D.R. Spelbring, R.R. Weichselbaum, and C-T. Chen. Accurate 3-D registration of CT, PET, and-or MR images of the brain. J. Computer Assisted Tomography, 13(1):20–26, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

25. O. Peria. Fusion d'images morphologiques et fonctionnelles par l'utilisation de capteur intermediaire. PhD thesis, University Joseph Fourier, Grenoble, France, avril 1996.

    Google Scholar 

26. O. Peria, L. Chevalier, A. Francois-Joubert, J.P. Caravel, S. Dalsoglio, S. Lavallee, and P. Cinquin. Using a 3D position sensor for registration of SPECT and US images of the kidney. In CVRMed'95, pages 23–29, Nice, april 1995. LNCS, Springer.

    Google Scholar 

27. O. Peria, A. Francois-Joubert, S. Lavallee, G. Champleboux, P. Cinquin, and S. Grand. Accurate registration of SPECT and MR brain images of patients suffering from epilepsy or tumor. In MRCAS'94, volume 1, pages 58–62, Pittsburgh, PA, September 1994.

    Google Scholar 

28. P.A. Viola and W.M. Wells. Alignment by maximization of mutual information. In Proc of 5th Int. Conf. Computer Vision (ICCV), 1995.

    Google Scholar 

Download references