[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content
Log in

Phragmites and environmental management: A question of values

  • Published:
Estuaries Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For a common, widespread, and familiar plant,Phragmites australis engenders an enormous level of scientific controversy and emotional conflict. In parts of the world,Phragmites is an important component of healthy ecosystems and an integral (if now minor) contributor to human economies. In other places it is an invading, unfriendly, and ugly weed. To some scientists and environmentalists,Phragmites is an indicator of and key factor in landscape degradation and habitat deterioration. To others, it is a valiant remnant of nature, providing a relatively rich ecology where there might otherwise be only barren and eroding ground. Our review of the literature leads us to conclude thatPhragmites is simply a biological entity. It is not inherently good or bad, since its evolution, biology, and ecology do not give it a value. The controversy overPhragmites, its role in the ecosystem, and the need for and intensity of management efforts are all artifacts of human perspectives. Effective, consistent management decisions (for either control or enhancement ofPhragmites) can only be made on the basis of site-specific scientific findings, a consideration of technologies with their needed level-of-effort, and explicit exposition of the human values driving the management options. We present a simple decision model to illustrate the interaction of these management components forPhragmites in the environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Ailstock, M. S. 1990. Environmental impacts, treatment methodologies and management criteria for establishment of a statewide policy for control of the marsh plantPhragmites, Prepared for Maryland Department of Natural Resources. Environmental Center, Anne Arundel Community College, Arnold, Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, B. W. andR. D. Ohmart. 1985. Habitat use by clapper rails in the lower Colorado River valley.The Condor 87: 116–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashby, R. 1952. Design for a Brain. John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, L. J. 1938. The Blue Winged Teal: Its Ecology and Management. Collegiate Press, Ames, Iowa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benoit, L. K. andR. A. Askins. 1999. Impact of the spread ofPhragmites on the distribution of birds in Connecticut tidal marhes.Wetlands 19:194–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bibby, C. J. andJ. Lund. 1982. Conservation of reed beds and their avifauna in England and Wales.Biological Conservation 23:167–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biddlestone, A. J., K. R. Gray, andK. Thurairajan. 1991. A botanical approach to the treatment of wastewaters.Journal of Biotechnology 17:209–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blossey, B. 2003. A framework for evaluating potential ecological effects of implementing biological control ofPhragmites australis.Estuaries 26:607–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boone, J., E. Furbish, andK. Turner. 1987. Control ofPhragmites communis: Results of burning, cutting and covering with plastic in a North Carolina salt marsh. National Park Service Cooperative Studies Unit, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boorman, L. A. andR. M. Fuller. 1981. The changing status of reedswamp in the Norfolk Broads.Journal of Applied Ecology 18:241–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burdick, D. M. andR. A. Konisky. 2003. Determinants of expansion forPhragmites australis, common reed, in natural and impacted coastal marshes.Estuaries 26:407–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burger, J. andL. M. Miller. 1977. Colony and nest site selection in white-faced and glossy ibises.The Auk 94:664–676.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R. M. 1997. Porewater chemistry associated withPhragmites andSpartina in a Connecticut tidal marsh.Wetlands 17:360–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R. M., L. A. Meyerson, andK. Saltonstall. 1999. Expansion ofPhragmites australis into tidal wetlands of North America.Aquatic Botany 64:261–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, W. R. 1994. Habitat selection by muskrats in experimental marshes undergoing succession.Canadian Journal of Zoology 72:675–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, M. 1983. Adaptability: The Significance of Variability from Molecule to Ecosystem. Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosby, A. 1972. The Columbian Exchange: Biological and Cultural Consequences of 1492. Greenwood Press, Westport, Connecticut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, D. H. and K. L. Fleming. 1989. Control ofPhragmites or common reed, p. 1–5.In D. H. Cross (ed.), Waterfowl Management Handbook. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Fish and Wildlife Leaflet #13, Manteo, North Carolina.

  • De Swardt, D. H. andD. J. Van Niekerk.1996. An annotated check list of the birds of Quaqwa National Park.Koedoe 39: 89–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diat, L. 1961. Gourmet’s Basic French Cookbook. Gourmet Books, Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodson, P. andL. P. Tataranov. 1990. Dinosaur extinction, p. 55–62.In D. B. Weishampel, P. Dodson, and H. Osmolska (eds.), The Dinosauria. University of California Press, Berkeley, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elphick, J. 1997. A Guide Book to British Birds. BBC Books, London, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fell, P. E., S. P. Weissbach, D. A. Jones, M. A. Fallon, J. A. Zeppieri, E. K. Faison, K. A. Lennon, K. J. Newberry, andL. K. Reddington. 1998. Does invasion of oligohaline tidal marshes by reed grass,Phragmites australis, affect the availability of prey resources for the mummichog,Fundulus heteroclitus? Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 222:59–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, T. H. 1981. Winter roosting and feeding behaviour of pied wagtailsMotacilla alba near Oxford, England.Ibis 123: 463–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geller, M. S. 1972.Phragmites: Life preserver of the salt marsh.Underwater Naturalist 7:4–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, R. E. 1996. Factors affecting the population density of the corncrakeCrex crex in Britain and Ireland.Journal of Applied Ecology 33:237–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grove, A. T. andO. Rackham. 2001. The Nature of Mediterranean Europe: An Ecological History. Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, R. M. 1978. Shasta ground sloth food habits, Rampart Cave, Arizona.Paleobiology 4:302–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauber, D. P., D. A. White, S. P. Powers, andF. R. DeFrancesch. 1991. Isozyme variation and correspondence with unusual infrared reflectance patterns inPhragnites australis.Plant Systematics and Evolution 178:1–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hajalten, J. 1991. Muskrat territoriality, and the impact of territorial choice on reproduction and predation risk.Annales Zoologici Fennici 28:15–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D. L. 1980. Individuality and selection.Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 11:311–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Insley, H. andR. C. Boswell. 1978. The timing of arrivals of reed and sedge warblers at south coast ringing sites during autumn passatge.Ringing and Migration 2:1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janick, J., R. W. Schery, F. W. Woods, andV. W. Ruttan. 1974. Plant Science: An Introduction to World Crops. W. H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco, Connecticut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgensen, S. E. 1982. Exergy and buffering capacity in ecological systems. p. 61–72.In W. J. Mitsch, R. K. Ragade, R. W. Bosserman, and J. A. Dillon, Jr. (eds.), Energetics and Systems. Ann Arbor Science Publishers, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kane, R. 2001.Phragmites use by birds in New Jersey.Records of New Jersey Birds 26:122–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koestler, A. 1970. The Act of Creation. Pan Books, London, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. Y. 1990. Net aerial primary productivity, litter production and decomposition of the reedPhragmites communis in a nature reserve in Hong Kong: Management implications.Marine Ecology Progress Series 66:161–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyle, J. T. 1999. Design for Human Ecosystems: Landscape, Land Use, and Natural Resources. Island Press, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, J. J., T. O’Neill, andD. W. Lay. 1947. Management and significance of damage by geese and muskrats to Gulf Coast marshes.Journal of Wildlife Management 11:50–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marks, M., B. Lapin, andJ. Randall. 1994.Phragmites australis (P. communis): Threats, management, and monitoring.Natural Areas Journal 14:285–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, A. C. 1953. Improvement of duck marshes by weed control. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Circular#19, Washington, D.C.

  • McGee, H. 1984. On Food and Cooking: The Science and Lore of the Kitchen. Coller Books. MacMillan Publishing Company, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeill, J. R. 1992. The Mountains of the Mediterranean: An Environmental History. Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeill, J. R.. 2000. Something New Under the Sun: An Environmental History of the Twentieth-Century World. W. W. Norton and Company, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meiggs, R. 1982. Trees and Timber in the Ancient Mediterranean World. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyerson, L. A., K. Saltonstall, L. Windham, E. Kiviat, andS. Findlay. 2000. A comparison ofPhragmites australis in freshwater and brackish marsh environments in North America.Wetlands Ecology and Management 8:89–103.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. S. 1967. Pattern and process in competition.Advances in Ecological Research 4:56–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. 1992. Restoration of Aquatic Ecosystems. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nevel, B. N. 1996. Sustainable reed harvesting in the Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve, Romania. Master’s Thesis, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niering, W. 1988. Tidal wetlands restoration and creation along the east coast of North America, p. 259–285.In K. M. Urbanska, N. R. Webb, and P. J. Edwards (eds.), Restoration Ecology and Sustainable Development. Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowak, R. M. andJ. L. Paradiso. 1983. Walker’s Mammals of the World, 4th edition. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponting, C. 1991. A Green History of the World. Penguin Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redman, C. L. 1999. Human Impact on Ancient Environments. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, Arizona.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rejmanek, M., C. E. Sasser, andG. W. Peterson. 1988. Hurricane-induced sediment deposition in a Gulf Coast marsh.Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 27:217–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricciuti, E. R.. 1983. The all too common, common reed.Audubon 85:64–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roman, C. T.. 1978. Tidal restriction: Its impact on the vegetation of six Connecticut coastal marshes. Master’s Thesis, Connecticut College, New London, Connecticut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roman, C. T., W. A. Niering, andR. S. Warren. 1984. Salt marsh vegetation changes in response to tidal restriction.Environmental Management 8:141–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rooth, J. E. andL. Windham. 2000.Phragmites on death row: Is biocontrol really warranted?Wetland Journal 12:29–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shogolev, I. V.. 1996. Fluctuations and trends in breeding population of colonial waterbirds in the Dnestr Delta, Ukraine, Black Sea.Colonial Waterbirds 19:91–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stott, R. F. andS. J. L. Wright. 1991. Sewage treatment with plants.Letters in Applied Microbiology 12:99–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, N. 1955. Field Book of American Wildflowers. G. P. Putnam's Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Templer, P., S. Findlay, andC. Wigand. 1998. Sediment chemistry associated with native and non-native emergent macrophytes of a Hudson River marsh ecosystem.Wetlands 18:70–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurow, L. 1980. The Zero Sum Society. Basic Books, Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiner, R. 1995.Phragmites—controlling the all-too-common common reed. Massachusetts Wetlands Restoration Technical Note Number 1, Wetlands Restoration and Banking Program. Massachusetts Executive Office of Environmental Affairs, Newton Corner, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Putten, W. H. 1997. Die-back ofPhragmites australis in European wetlands: An overview of European research programmes on reed die-back and progression.Aquatic Botany 59:263–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ventura, J., J. Gosalbez, andM. J. Lopez-Fuster. 1989. Trophic ecology ofArvicola sapidus in the Ebro Delta (Spain).Zoologischer Anzeiger 223:283–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, R. S. andP. E. Fell. 1996.Phragmites australis on the Lower Connecticut River: Impacts on Emergent Wetlands and Estuarine Rivers. Connecticut College, New London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wharton, G. W. andH. S. Fuller. 1952. A Manual of the Chiggers. Entomological Society of Washington, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitman, W. R. andR. V. Cole. 1988. Waterfowl and wetland management in the Delaware River basin, p. 202–216.In S. K. Majumdar, E. W. Miller, and L. E. Sage (eds.), Ecology and Restoration of the Delaware River Basin. Pennsylvania Academy of Science, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilford, J. N. 1985. The Riddle of the Dinosaur. Alfred A. Knopf, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. O. 1974. The Insect Societies. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ludwig, D.F., Iannuzzi, T.J. & Esposito, A.N. Phragmites and environmental management: A question of values. Estuaries 26, 624–630 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02823738

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02823738

Keywords

Navigation