[go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Innovation and diffusion in small firms: Theory and evidence

  • Published:
Small Business Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The article provides an inventory of the strengths and weaknesses of small firms in a dynamic context. To do this it considers verbal accounts of the processes of innovation and diffusion, as well as quantitative studies testing cause-effect relations. It consider both economic and noneconomic factors, concerning issues of motivation, perception and knowledge. First an overall summary is given of the characteristics of small business compared with large business, as a basis for an assessment of strengths and weaknesses. Perhaps the most important characteristic of small business is its diversity, and the article gives the conditions and sources of it. Other core characteristics are small scale, personality and independence of the small firm. From these, derived characteristics, strengths and weaknesses and core strategies can be inferred. From the perspective of the firm, strengths and weaknesses are subsequently analysed for the successive stages of innovation: invention, development, tooling/production, introduction to practice/market. Strengths and weaknesses in diffusion are analysed for the successive stages in the adoption process, as proposed by Rogers. Reference is made to theory and to empirical studies from the literature and from research by the present author.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abernathy, W. J., 1978,The Productivity Dilemma, London: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acs, Z. and D. Audretsch, 1990,Innovation and Small Firms, Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acs, Z. and D. Audretsch, 1991, ‘R&D, Firm Size and Innovative Activity’, in Z. Acs and D. Audretsch (eds.),Innovation and Technological Change, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amin, A., 1989, ‘Flexible Specialisation and Small Firms in Italy: Myths and Realities’,Antipode 21, 13–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, L. and J. T. Scott, 1987,Market Structure and Technological Change, Chur: Harwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, B., 1983,The Logic and Limits of Trust, New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biemans, W. G., 1989,Developing Innovations Within Networks, PhD Thesis, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.

  • Blair, J. M., 1972,Economic Concentration, New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolwijn, P. T. and T. Kumpe, 1990, ‘Manufacturing in the 1990s — Productivity, Flexibility and Innovation’,Long Range Planning 23, 44–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boog, J. and H. Kuiken, 1985,The Income Position of Independents in SME (in Dutch), Zoetermeer, the Netherlands: EIM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bound, J., C. Cummins, Z. Griliches, B. H. Hall and A. Jaffe, 1984, ‘Who Does R&D and Who Patents’, in Z. Griliches (ed.),R&D, Patents and Productivity, Chicago: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. S., 1982,Toward a Structural Theory of Action, Network Models of Social Structure, New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. S., 1987, ‘Social Contagion and Innovation: Cohesion versus Structural Equivalence’,American Journal of Sociology 92, 1297–1335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannon, T., 1985, ‘Innovation, Creativity and Small Firms Organisation’,International Small Business Journal 4(1), 33–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chell, E., 1985, ‘The Entrepreneurial Personality: A Few Ghosts Laid to Rest?’,International Small Business Journal 3(3), 43–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R. G., 1983, ‘The New Product Process: An Empirically Based Classification Scheme’,R&D Management 13(1).

  • Cuff, E. C., W. W. Sharrock and D. W. Francis, 1979,Perspectives in Sociology, London: Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, C. D., G. E. Hills and W. LaForge, 1985, ‘The Marketing/Small Enterprise Paradox, a Research Agenda’,International Small Business Journal 3(3), 31–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, P. A., 1975,Technical Choice, Innovation and Economic Growth, Cambridge: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, S., 1979,The Diffusion of Process Innovations, Cambridge: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donckels, R. and J. Degadt, 1985, ‘SME's and Public Authorities; on the Information and Communication Gap’,International Small Business Journal 3(3).

  • Dosi, G., 1984,Technical Change and Industrial Transformation, London: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dosi, G., 1988, ‘Sources, Procedures and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation’,Journal of Economic Literature 26, 1120–1171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, C., J. Clark and L. Soete, 1982,Unemployment and Technical Innovation, London.

  • Groen, A., 1991,Adoption of Technological Innovation to Solve Pollution Problems in SME: A Network Approach, paper IMP conference, Uppsala.

  • Habermas, J., 1982,Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns, Teil I&II, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J., 1984,Vorstudien und Ergänzungen zur Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendrikse, G. W. J., 1988,On the Role of Small Firms, PhD thesis, University of Pittsburgh.

  • Hippel, E. von, 1988,The Sources of Innovation, Oxford: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jewkes, J., D. Sawyers and R. Stillerman, 1958,The Sources of Invention, MacMillan.

  • Johannisson, B., 1986, ‘Network Strategies, Management Technology for Entrepreneurship and Change’,International Small Business Journal 5(1).

  • Johnson, J. L. and R. Kuehn, 1987, ‘The Small Business Owner/Manager's Search for External Information’,Journal of Small Business Management, July, 53–60.

  • Kamien, M. I. and N. L. Schwarz, 1982,Market Structure and Innovation, Cambridge: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazanjian, R. K. and R. Drazin, 1990, ‘A Stage-Contingent Model of Design and Growth for Technology Based New Ventures’,Journal of Business Venturing 5, 137–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kets de Vries, M. F. R., 1977, ‘The Entrepreneurial Personality, A Person at the Crossroads’,Journal of Management Studies, February 1977, 34–57.

  • Kirchhoff, B. A., 1989, ‘Creative Destruction among Industrial Firms in the United States’,Small Business Economics 1, 161–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinknecht, A., 1987a,Industrial Innovation in the Netherlands (in Dutch), Assen/Maastricht: van Gorcum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinknecht, A., 1987b, ‘Measuring R&D in Small Firms: How Much Are We Missing?’,Journal of Industrial Economics 34, 253–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langlois, R. N. and P. L. Robertson, 1990, ‘Innovation in a Modular System: Lessons from the Microcomputer and Stereo Component Industries’, paper conferenceInternational Joseph A. Schumpeter Society, Airlie House, Virginia.

  • Lee, T. and L. L. Wilde, 1980, ‘Market Structure and Innovation: A Reformulation’,The Quarterly Journal of Economics 94, 429–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loury, G. C., 1979, ‘Market Structure and Innovation’,Quarterly Journal of Economics 93, 395–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacMillan, I. C., L. Zemann and P. N. Subbanarasimha, 1987, ‘Criteria Distinguishing Successful from Unsuccessful Ventures in the Venture Screening Process’,Journal of Small Business Venturing 2, 123–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahajan, V., E. Muller and F. Bass, 1990, ‘New Product Diffusion Models in Marketing: A Review and Directions for Research’,Journal of Marketing 54(1), 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, E., 1969,Industrial Research and Technological Innovation, London: Longmans, Green & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H., 1983,Structures in Fives: Designing Effective Organizations, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • MITI, 1984,Small Business in Japan, Tokyo: MITI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neave, E. H. and J. C. Wiginton, 1981,Financial Management, Theory and Strategies, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. R. and S. G. Winter, 1982,An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Harvard: Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • NOBIN, 1983,External Information Acquisition of the Small and Medium Sized Manufacturing Firm (in Dutch), the Hague: NOBIN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noorderhaven, N. G., 1990,Private Competence and Public Responsibility; Anatomy of a Government-Firm Relationship, PhD Thesis, University of Groningen.

  • Nooteboom, B., 1984, ‘Innovation, Life Cycle and the Share of Independents: Cases from Retailing’,International Small Business Journal 3(1), 21–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nooteboom, B., 1985, ‘A Mark-up Model of Retail Margins’,Applied Economics 17, 647–667.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nooteboom, B., 1987, ‘What Small Businesses Do and Omit’ (in Dutch), in:On the Measure of Small Business (in Dutch), report to the government no. 30, Scientific Council for Government Policy (WRR), the Hague.

  • Nooteboom, B., 1988, ‘The Facts about Small Business and the Real Values of Its Life World’,American Journal of Economics and Sociology 17, 299–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nooteboom, B., 1989a, ‘Diffusion, Uncertainty and Firm Size’,International Journal of Research in Marketing 6, 109–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nooteboom, B., 1989c, ‘Paradox, Identity and Change in Management’,Human Systems Management 8, 291–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nooteboom, B., 1991a, ‘Entry, Spending and Firm Size in a Stochastic R&D Race’,Small Business Economics 3, 103–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nooteboom, B., 1992a, ‘Towards a Dynamic Theory of Transactions’,Evolutionary Economics 2, 281–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nooteboom, B., 1992b,Small Business, Institutions and Economic Systems, paper EACES conference, Groningen, the Netherlands, September, 1992.

  • Nooteboom, B., 1992c,Schumpeterian and Austrian Entrepreneurship: A Unified Concept of Change, Research Report, School of Management and Organization, P.O. Box, 9700 AV, Groningen, The Netherlands.

  • Nooteboom, B., 1993a, ‘Adoption, Firm Size and Risk of Implementation’,Economics of Innovation and New Technology 2, 203–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nooteboom, B., 1993b, ‘Firm Size Effects on Transaction Costs’,Small Business Economics 5(4), 283–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nooteboom, B., C. A. Coehoorn and A. H. van der Zwaan, 1992, ‘The Purpose and Effectiveness of Technology Transfer to Small Business’,Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 4(2), 149–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nooteboom, B., P. S. Zwart and T. Bijmolt, 1992, ‘Transaction Costs and Standardization in Professional Services to Small Business’,Small Business Economics 4, 141–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nooteboom, B. and R. W. Vossen, 1993, ‘Firm Size and Efficiency in R&D Spending’, in: A. V. Witteloostuyn (ed.),Market Evolution, Competition and Cooperation across Markets and over Time, forthcoming; Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C., 1990,Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavitt, K., 1984, ‘Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change’,Research Policy 13, 343–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piore, M. and C. Sabel, 1983, ‘Italian Small Business Development: Lessons for US Industrial Policy’, in J. Zysman and L. Tyson (eds.),American Industry in International Competition: Government Policies and Corporate Strategies, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M., 1962,Personal Knowledge, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M., 1966,The Tacit Dimension, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M., 1969,Knowing and Being, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pompe, J. H., M. H. Bruyn and J. V. Koek,Entrepreneurship in International Comparative Perspective (in Dutch), University of Groningen.

  • Porter, M. E., 1980,Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analysing Industries and Competitors, New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., 1985,Competitive Advantage, New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinganum, J. F., 1985, ‘Innovation and Industry Evolution’,The Quarterly Journal of Economics C, 81–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M. 1983,Diffusion of Innovations, New York: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosegger, G., 1980,The Economics of Production and Innovation: An Industrial Perspective, Oxford: Pergamom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, N. (ed.), 1983,The Economics of Technological Change, Penguin.

  • Rothwell, R., 1985,Innovation and the Smaller Firm, First International Technical Innovation and Entrepreneurship Symposium, Utah Innovation Foundation, Salt Lake City, 11–13 September.

  • Rothwell, R., 1986, ‘The Role of Small Firms in Technological Innovation’, in J. Curran (ed.),The Survival of the Small Firm, Gower.

  • Rothwell, R., 1989, ‘Small Firms, Innovation and Industrial Change’,Small Business Economics 1, 51–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothwell, R. and W. Zegveld, 1985,Innovation and the Small and Medium Sized Firm, London: Francis Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandberg, W. R. and C. W. Hofer, 1987, ‘Improving New Venture Performance: The Role of Strategy, Industry Structure, and the Entrepreneur’,Journal of Business Venturing 2, 5–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scase, R. and R. Goffee, 1980,The Real World of the Small Business Owner, London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, F. M., 1980,Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance, Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, F. M., 1984,Innovation and Growth: Schumpeterian Perspectives, MIT Press.

  • Schumpeter, J. A., 1909,Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung, Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A., 1939,Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process, New York & London: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A., 1943,Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, London: Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A., 1983,Reason in Human Affairs, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smilor, R. W. and H. R. Feeser, 1991, ‘Chaos and the Entrepreneurial Process: Patterns and Policy Implications for Technology Entrepreneurship’,Journal of Small Business Venturing 6, 165–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soete, L. G., 1979, ‘Firm Size and Inventive Activity: The Evidence Reconsidered’,European Economic Review 12, 319–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanworth, M. J. K. and J. Curran, 1976, ‘Growth and the Smaller Firm — An Alternative View’,Journal of Management and Studies, May, 95–110.

  • Stoneman, P., 1983,The Economic Analysis of Technological Change, Oxford: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tillaart, H. J. M. van den, H. C. van der Hoeven and F. W. van Uxem, 1981,Independent Entrepreneurship (in Dutch), Nijmegen/Zoetermeer: ITS/EIM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkataraman, S., A. van de Ven, J. Buckeye and R. Hudson, 1990, ‘Starting Up in a Turbulent Environment: A Process Model of Failure Among Firms with a High Customer Dependence’,Journal of Business Venturing 5, 277–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyatt, S., 1985, ‘The Role of Small Firms in Innovative Activity’,Economia and Politica Industriale.

  • Weinberg, N. M., 1990,Innovation, Competition and Small Business, PhD Thesis Erasmus University Rotterdam, Alblasserdam, the Netherlands: Haveka.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wind, Y. and R. J. Thomas, 1980, ‘Conceptual and Methodological Issues in Organizational Buying Behaviour’,European Journal of Marketing 14(5/6), 239–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E., 1975,Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications, New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E., 1985,The Economic Institutions of Capitalism; Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting, New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Management and Organisation, Groningen University, P.O. Box 800, 9700 AV, Groningen, the Netherlands

    Bart Nooteboom

Authors
  1. Bart Nooteboom
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nooteboom, B. Innovation and diffusion in small firms: Theory and evidence. Small Bus Econ 6, 327–347 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01065137

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01065137

Keywords

Search

Navigation