[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Methodology-Driven Characteristics of Scientific Research Collaboration Networks in the Field of Economic Management: Mining and Analysis Based on Big Data

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Big Data and Security (ICBDS 2021)

Abstract

Objective: Research takes the methodological knowledge in the full text of academic literature as a knowledge production element, and divides it into four categories: Theory &Method, Data, Model, and Tool & Software. Identify the complex network characteristics of scientific research collaboration in economic management field driven by it, in order to achieve efficient promotion of knowledge production. Methods: Develop a crawler by python, and uses CNKI as data source to obtain the full text data of 5,564 papers (about 50,076,000 characters) from 2000 to 2019 in “Management World”, then combines the TF-IDF, fusion rules and manual annotation to extract 6946 records of methodological knowledge data and its subsidiary information. The relationship were visualized by Gephi, and characteristics are analyzed. Results/Conclusions: The overall collaboration network and scientific research institutions driven by Theory &Method are the most complexity and multi-mode (complete and continuous development model are included), while it has a cohesive collaborative subnet. Methodological knowledge-driven scientific research collaboration networks have different characteristics: Theory & Method driven has the highest complexity, a long duration, and much more mature in economics and management field. The network formed by institutions has a low density, means a cross-institutional, large-scale collaboration model has not yet been formed, which may be restricted by geographical factors and research topics. Among the four types of methodological knowledge, the Theory &Method and Data type drive the research collaboration of institutions more obviously. Limitations: The types and numbers of data sources in this study need to be expanded, and the extraction of specific methodological knowledge for the full text of academic literature needs to be further expanded by relying on machine learning and other methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Li, G., Li, C., Li, X.: Research on the discovery of scientific research teams based on social network analysis. Libr. Inf. Serv. 58(07), 63–70, 82 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pan, X.: Research on automatic extraction of software entities and academic influence. Nanjing University (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Xu, H., Zhu, X., Zhang, C., et al.: Analysis and design of methodological knowledge extraction system for full text of academic documents. Data Anal. Knowl. Disc. 3(10), 29–36 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wang, F., Zhu, N., Zhai, Y.: The application of hybrid methods in China’s information science research and the analysis of their field distribution. J. Inf. 36(11), 1119–1129 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wang, Y., Zhang, C.: Using the full-text content of academic articles to identify and evaluate algorithm entities in the domain of natural language processing. J. Informetr. 14, 101091 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang, Z.: Research on the application of social network analysis methods in scientific research collaboration networks. Dalian University of Technology (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ye, G., Xia, L.: Analysis of cross-regional scientific research collaboration model. J. Libr. Sci. China 45(03), 79–95 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Yeh, Yu, Z., Qian, L.: Multidimensional effects of proximity between the US cities of research collaboration. Inf. Theory Pract. 43(11), 86–91 + 27 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wen, W., Ding, K., Zhu, Z.: Scientific cooperation network of China’s major research institutions in the analysis - based on Web of Science study. Res. Sci. 28(12), 1806–1812 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chai, Y., Liu, C., Wang, X.: The construction and characteristic analysis of China’s university scientific research cooperation network —— based on the data of “211” universities. Libr. Inf. Serv. 59(02), 82–88 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zhao, R., Wen, F.: Research collaboration and knowledge exchange. Libr. Inf. Serv. 55(20), 6–10, 27 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wang, C.: Research on the influencing factors of university teachers’ scientific research cooperation: taking Guangxi as an example. Sci. Technol. Prog. Policy 29(21), 145–149 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Xu, H., Huang, C., Jin, W., et al.: Research hotspots in subject areas and pattern recognition of scientific research collaborations —— taking Chinese literature in the field of acoustics in China as an example. Jiangsu Sci. Technol. Inf. 37(19), 13–16 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gao, X., Chen, K.: Complex network analysis of the evolution characteristics of cooperative innovation network structure. Sci. Res. Manage. 36(06), 28–36 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wang, J., Hou, H., Fu, H., et al.: Author cooperation network structure and group differences in the tripartite relationship analysis. Libr. Inf. Serv. 62(09), 102–111 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wang, F., Shi, H., Ji, X.: Application of theory in information science research in China: based on the content analysis of “Journal of Information.” J. Inf. 34(06), 581–591 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gephi. https://gephi.org/

  18. Li, L.: Research on the research collaboration network —— based on the perspective of social network theory. Huazhong Agricultural University, Hubei (2011). https://doi.org/10.7666/d.y2003857

  19. Peng, X., Zhu, Q., Shen, C.: Analysis of author cooperation in the field of social computing based on social network analysis. J. Inf. 32(03), 93–100 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wang, H., Yu, C., Zhao, P.: The duality of consumer ethnocentrism and its market strategic significance. Manage. World 02, 96–107 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wang, H., Zhao, P.: Research on market segmentation based on consumer ethnocentrism. Manage. World (05), 88–96, 156 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wang, Y., Yu, C., Zhao, P.: The relationship between the consumer model of brand equity and the product market output model. Manage. World 01, 106–119 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research was supported by Jiangsu Provincial Social Science Foundation Youth Project: Research on the recommendation strategy of electronic literature resources integrating online academic social information (No. 21TQC003); the University Philosophy and Social Science Research Project of Jiangsu province (No. 2019SJA2274); Innovation Fund General Project I of Nanjing Institute of Technology (No. CKJB202003); Major Project of Philosophy and Social Science Research in Universities of Jiangsu Provincial Department of Education (No. CKJA201706); National College Student Practice Innovation Training Program Project of Nanjing Institute of Technology (No. 202011276021Z).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Xu, H. et al. (2022). Methodology-Driven Characteristics of Scientific Research Collaboration Networks in the Field of Economic Management: Mining and Analysis Based on Big Data. In: Tian, Y., Ma, T., Khan, M.K., Sheng, V.S., Pan, Z. (eds) Big Data and Security. ICBDS 2021. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1563. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0852-1_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0852-1_25

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-19-0851-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-19-0852-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics