Abstract
Claim detection is one of the most important tasks in argument mining. Most existing work employs supervised methods that rely on not only good-quality and large-scale annotated corpora, but also highly engineered and sophisticated features. Unsupervised methods are a possible solution to the above problems but few work has been done from unsupervised perspective. In this paper, we propose an unsupervised joint model including position model, indicator model and TextRank model. Position information is important for argument components detection, and our position model not only considers the sentences at the beginning and the end of the whole text but also at the beginning and the end of each paragraph. Considering the discourse makers’ good indication of claims, we also introduce indicator model into our joint model. Experiments on three English argumentation corpora show that our model outperforms the state-of-the-art unsupervised methods for claim detection.
The work is supported by both National scientific and Technological Innovation Zero (No. 17-H863-01-ZT-005-005-01) and State’s Key Project of Research and Development Plan (No. 2016QY03D0505).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
\(P_a\) function is defined as \(\rho _{s_i} / {\sum _{s_j \in c} \rho _{s_j}}\). In \(P_a\), \(\rho _{s_i} = mf(pos_i)^2\, +\, nf(pos_i)\, +\, p\). Given L(c) as the number of sentences of c, \(f(pos_i) = |{L(c)} / {2} - pos_i|\). And the parameters m, n, p determine the shape of \(\rho _{s_i}\) where we set them all equal to 1.
References
Ajjour, Y., Chen, W.F., Kiesel, J., Wachsmuth, H., Stein, B.: Unit segmentation of argumentative texts. In: Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Argument Mining, pp. 118–128. Association for Computational Linguistics (2017)
Aker, A., et al.: What works and what does not: classifier and feature analysis for argument mining. In: Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Argument Mining. Association for Computational Linguistics (2017)
Blei, D.M., Ng, A.Y., Jordan, M.I.: Latent Dirichlet allocation. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3, 993–1022 (2003)
Bohde, J.: Document summarization using TextRank (2012). http://joshbohde.com/blog/document-summarization
Christopher, D.M., Prabhakar, R., Hinrich, S.: Introduction To Information Retrieval, vol. 151, no. 177, p. 5 (2008)
Eger, S., Daxenberger, J., Gurevych, I.: Neural end-to-end learning for computational argumentation mining. In: Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pp. 11–22. Association for Computational Linguistics (2017). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/P17-1002
Ferrara, A., Montanelli, S., Petasis, G.: Unsupervised detection of argumentative units though topic modeling techniques. In: Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Argument Mining, pp. 97–107. Association for Computational Linguistics (2017)
Freeley, A.J., Steinberg, D.L.: Argumentation and Debate. Cengage Learning, Boston (2013)
Habernal, I., Gurevych, I.: Exploiting debate portals for semi-supervised argumentation mining in user-generated web discourse. In: Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 2127–2137. Association for Computational Linguistics (2015). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/D15-1255
Lawrence, J., Reed, C.: Combining argument mining techniques. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Argumentation Mining, pp. 127–136. Association for Computational Linguistics (2015). https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/W15-0516
Levy, R., Bilu, Y., Hershcovich, D., Aharoni, E., Slonim, N.: Context dependent claim detection. In: Proceedings of COLING 2014, the 25th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Technical Papers, pp. 1489–1500. Dublin City University and Association for Computational Linguistics (2014)
Levy, R., Gretz, S., Sznajder, B., Hummel, S., Aharonov, R., Slonim, N.: Unsupervised corpus-wide claim detection. In: Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Argument Mining, pp. 79–84. Association for Computational Linguistics (2017)
Lippi, M., Torroni, P.: Argument mining: a machine learning perspective. In: Black, E., Modgil, S., Oren, N. (eds.) TAFA 2015. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 9524, pp. 163–176. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28460-6_10
Lippi, M., Torroni, P.: Context-independent claim detection for argument mining. IJCAI 15, 185–191 (2015)
Lippi, M., Torroni, P.: Argumentation mining: state of the art and emerging trends. ACM Trans. Internet Technol. (TOIT) 16(2), 10 (2016)
Mihalcea, R., Tarau, P.: TextRank: bringing order into text. In: Proceedings of the 2004 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (2004)
Nguyen, H., Litman, D.: Extracting argument and domain words for identifying argument components in texts. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Argumentation Mining, pp. 22–28. Association for Computational Linguistics (2015)
Palau, R.M., Moens, M.F.: Argumentation mining: the detection, classification and structure of arguments in text. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pp. 98–107. ACM (2009)
Petasis, G., Karkaletsis, V.: Identifying argument components through TextRank. In: Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Argument Mining (ArgMining2016), pp. 94–102. Association for Computational Linguistics (2016). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W16-2811
Rinott, R., Dankin, L., Alzate Perez, C., Khapra, M.M., Aharoni, E., Slonim, N.: Show me your evidence - an automatic method for context dependent evidence detection. In: Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 440–450. Association for Computational Linguistics (2015). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/D15-1050
Shnarch, E., Levy, R., Raykar, V., Slonim, N.: GRASP: rich patterns for argumentation mining. In: Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 1345–1350. Association for Computational Linguistics (2017)
Stab, C., Gurevych, I.: Annotating argument components and relations in persuasive essays. In: Proceedings of COLING 2014, the 25th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Technical Papers, pp. 1501–1510. Dublin City University and Association for Computational Linguistics (2014)
Stab, C., Gurevych, I.: Identifying argumentative discourse structures in persuasive essays. In: Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pp. 46–56. Association for Computational Linguistics (2014)
Stab, C., Gurevych, I.: Parsing argumentation structures in persuasive essays. Computational Linguistics 43(3), 619–659 (2017)
Teufel, S., et al.: Argumentative zoning: information extraction from scientific text. Ph.D. thesis, Citeseer (1999)
Toulmin, S.: The Uses of Argument. Cambridge UP, Cambridge (2003)
Wachsmuth, H., Al Khatib, K., Stein, B.: Using argument mining to assess the argumentation quality of essays. In: Proceedings of COLING 2016, the 26th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Technical Papers, pp. 1680–1691. The COLING 2016 Organizing Committee (2016)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Duan, X., Liao, M., Zhao, X., Wu, W., Lv, P. (2019). An Unsupervised Joint Model for Claim Detection. In: Sun, F., Liu, H., Hu, D. (eds) Cognitive Systems and Signal Processing. ICCSIP 2018. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1005. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7983-3_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7983-3_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-7982-6
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-7983-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)