[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Will Structuring the Collaboration of Students Improve Their Argumentation?

  • Conference paper
Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6738))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Learning to argue in a computer-mediated and structured fashion is investigated in this research. A study was conducted to compare dyads that were scripted in their computer-mediated collaboration with dyads that were not scripted. A process analysis of the chats of the dyads showed that the scripted experimental group used significantly more words and engaged in significantly more broadening and deepening of the discussion than the non-scripted control group.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Scheuer, O., Loll, F., Pinkwart, N., McLaren, B.M.: Computer-Supported Argumentation: A Review of the State of the Art. ijCSCL 5(1), 43–102 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Weinberger, A., Stegmann, K., Fischer, F.: Learning to Argue Online: Scripted Groups Surpass Individuals (Unscripted Groups do not). Comp. in Hum. Beh. 26, 506–515 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Weinberger, A., Fischer, F.: A Framework to Analyze Argumentative Knowledge Construction in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. Computers & Education 46(1), 71–95 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Rummel, N., Spada, H.: Learning to Collaborate: An Instructional Approach to Promoting Collaborative Problem Solving in Computer-Mediated Settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences 14(2), 201–241 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Nussbaum, E.M.: Collaborative Discourse, Argumentation, and Learning: Preface and Literature Review. Contemporary Educational Psychology 33(3), 345–359 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Baker, M., Andriessen, J., Lund, K., van Amelsvoort, M., Quignard, M.: Rainbow: A Framework for Analyzing Computer-Mediated Pedagogical Debates. ijCSCL 2(2-3), 247–272 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Scheuer, O., McLaren, B.M., Harrell, M., Weinberger, A. (2011). Will Structuring the Collaboration of Students Improve Their Argumentation?. In: Biswas, G., Bull, S., Kay, J., Mitrovic, A. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education. AIED 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6738. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21869-9_96

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21869-9_96

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-21868-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-21869-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics