[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Opinion Changing Aversion Functions for Group Settlement Modeling

  • Chapter
Consensual Processes

Part of the book series: Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing ((STUDFUZZ,volume 267))

  • 747 Accesses

Abstract

Opinion changing aversion (OCA) functions are used to quantify the decision makers’ resistance to opinion changing. By introducing OCA functions of polynomial form we will show that if each expert has a quadratic opinion changing aversion function then the minimum-cost solution is nothing else but the weighted average of the individual optimal solutions where the weights are the relative importances of the decision makers. We will consider minimum-cost solutions for group settlements under crisp and fuzzy budget constraints.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Balinski, M., Laraki, R.: A Theory of Measuring, electing and ranking. PNAS 104(21), 8720–8725 (2007)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. de Borda, J.-C.: Histoire de l’Academie Royale des Sciences, pp. 657–665 (1754)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bordogna., G., Fedrizzi, M., Pasi, G.: A linguistic approach to modeling of consensus in GDSS. In: Proceedings EUROXIII/OR, Glasgow, vol. 36 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fedrizzi, M., Kacprzyk, J., Zadrozny, S.: An interactive multiuser decision support system for consensus reaching processes using fuzzy logic with linguistic quantifiers. Decision Support Systems 4(3), 313–327 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fedrizzi, M., Mich, L.: Decision using production rules. In: Proc. of Annual Conference of the Operational Research Society of Italy (AIRO 1991), September 18–10, pp. 118–121. Riva del Garda, Italy (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fedrizzi, M., Fullér, R.: On stability in group decision support systems under fuzzy production rules. In: Trappl, R. (ed.) Proceedings of the Eleventh European Meeting on Cybernetics and Systems Research, pp. 471–478. World Scientific Publisher, London (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fedrizzi, M.: Fuzzy approach to modeling consensus in group decisions. In: Proceedings of First Workshop on Fuzzy Set Theory and Real Applications, Milano, Automazione e strumentazione, Supplement to, issue, May 10, pp. 9–13 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fedrizzi, M.: Fuzzy consensus models in GDSS. In: Proceedings of the 2nd New Zealand Two-Stream International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks and Expert Systems, pp. 284–287 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fedrizzi, M., Fedrizzi, M., Marques Pereira, R.A.: On the issue of consistency in dynamical consensual aggregation. In: Bouchon Meunier, B., Gutierrez Rios, J., Magdalena, L., Yager, R.R. (eds.) Technologies for constructing intelligent systems, vol. 89, Studies in Soft Computing, Berlin (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fedrizzi, M., Brunelli, M.: Fair consistency evaluation in reciprocal relations and in group decision making. New Mathematics and Natural Computation 5(2), 407–420 (2009)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Forman, E., Peniwati, K.: Aggregating individual judgments and priorities with the Analytic Hierarchy Process. European Journal of Operational Research 108(1), 165–169 (1998)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Fullér, R., Mich, L.: Fuzzy reasoning techniques for GDSS. In: Proceedings of EUFIT 1993 Conference, Aachen, Germany, September 7-10, pp. 937–940. Verlag der Augustinus Buchhandlung, Aachen (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jabeur, K., Martel, J.-.M.-.: An agreement index with respect to a consensus preorder. Group Decision and Negotiation, doi:10.1007/s10726-009-9160-3

    Google Scholar 

  14. Meskanen, T., Nurmi, H.: Distance from Consensus: A Theme and Variations. In: Simeone, B., Pukelsheim, F. (eds.) Mathematics and Democracy: recent Advances in Voting Systems and Collective Choice, Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mich, L., Fedrizzi, M., Gaio, L.: Approximate Reasoning in the Modeling of Consensus in Group Decisions. In: Klement, E.-P., Slany, W. (eds.) FLAI 1993. LNCS, vol. 695, pp. 91–102. Springer, Heidelberg (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mikhailov, L.: Group prioritization in the AHP by fuzzy preference programming method. Computers & operations research 31(2), 293–301 (2004)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Orlovsky, S.A.: Decision-making with a fuzzy preference relation. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 1(3), 155–167 (1978)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Ramanathan, R., Ganesh, L.S.: Group preference aggregation methods employed in AHP: An evaluation and an intrinsic process for deriving members’ weightages. European Journal of Operational Research 79(2), 249–265 (1994)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Saaty, T.: A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 15(3), 234–281 (1977)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Tanino, T.: Fuzzy preference orderings in group decision making. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 12(2), 117–131 (1984)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Zimmermann, H.-J.: Fuzzy programming and linear programming with several objective functions. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 1(1), 45–55 (1978)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Brunelli, M., Fullér, R., Mezei, J. (2011). Opinion Changing Aversion Functions for Group Settlement Modeling. In: Herrera-Viedma, E., García-Lapresta, J.L., Kacprzyk, J., Fedrizzi, M., Nurmi, H., Zadrożny, S. (eds) Consensual Processes. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol 267. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20533-0_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20533-0_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-20532-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-20533-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics