Abstract
Opinion changing aversion (OCA) functions are used to quantify the decision makers’ resistance to opinion changing. By introducing OCA functions of polynomial form we will show that if each expert has a quadratic opinion changing aversion function then the minimum-cost solution is nothing else but the weighted average of the individual optimal solutions where the weights are the relative importances of the decision makers. We will consider minimum-cost solutions for group settlements under crisp and fuzzy budget constraints.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Balinski, M., Laraki, R.: A Theory of Measuring, electing and ranking. PNAS 104(21), 8720–8725 (2007)
de Borda, J.-C.: Histoire de l’Academie Royale des Sciences, pp. 657–665 (1754)
Bordogna., G., Fedrizzi, M., Pasi, G.: A linguistic approach to modeling of consensus in GDSS. In: Proceedings EUROXIII/OR, Glasgow, vol. 36 (1994)
Fedrizzi, M., Kacprzyk, J., Zadrozny, S.: An interactive multiuser decision support system for consensus reaching processes using fuzzy logic with linguistic quantifiers. Decision Support Systems 4(3), 313–327 (1988)
Fedrizzi, M., Mich, L.: Decision using production rules. In: Proc. of Annual Conference of the Operational Research Society of Italy (AIRO 1991), September 18–10, pp. 118–121. Riva del Garda, Italy (1991)
Fedrizzi, M., Fullér, R.: On stability in group decision support systems under fuzzy production rules. In: Trappl, R. (ed.) Proceedings of the Eleventh European Meeting on Cybernetics and Systems Research, pp. 471–478. World Scientific Publisher, London (1992)
Fedrizzi, M.: Fuzzy approach to modeling consensus in group decisions. In: Proceedings of First Workshop on Fuzzy Set Theory and Real Applications, Milano, Automazione e strumentazione, Supplement to, issue, May 10, pp. 9–13 (1993)
Fedrizzi, M.: Fuzzy consensus models in GDSS. In: Proceedings of the 2nd New Zealand Two-Stream International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks and Expert Systems, pp. 284–287 (1995)
Fedrizzi, M., Fedrizzi, M., Marques Pereira, R.A.: On the issue of consistency in dynamical consensual aggregation. In: Bouchon Meunier, B., Gutierrez Rios, J., Magdalena, L., Yager, R.R. (eds.) Technologies for constructing intelligent systems, vol. 89, Studies in Soft Computing, Berlin (1990)
Fedrizzi, M., Brunelli, M.: Fair consistency evaluation in reciprocal relations and in group decision making. New Mathematics and Natural Computation 5(2), 407–420 (2009)
Forman, E., Peniwati, K.: Aggregating individual judgments and priorities with the Analytic Hierarchy Process. European Journal of Operational Research 108(1), 165–169 (1998)
Fullér, R., Mich, L.: Fuzzy reasoning techniques for GDSS. In: Proceedings of EUFIT 1993 Conference, Aachen, Germany, September 7-10, pp. 937–940. Verlag der Augustinus Buchhandlung, Aachen (1993)
Jabeur, K., Martel, J.-.M.-.: An agreement index with respect to a consensus preorder. Group Decision and Negotiation, doi:10.1007/s10726-009-9160-3
Meskanen, T., Nurmi, H.: Distance from Consensus: A Theme and Variations. In: Simeone, B., Pukelsheim, F. (eds.) Mathematics and Democracy: recent Advances in Voting Systems and Collective Choice, Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Mich, L., Fedrizzi, M., Gaio, L.: Approximate Reasoning in the Modeling of Consensus in Group Decisions. In: Klement, E.-P., Slany, W. (eds.) FLAI 1993. LNCS, vol. 695, pp. 91–102. Springer, Heidelberg (1993)
Mikhailov, L.: Group prioritization in the AHP by fuzzy preference programming method. Computers & operations research 31(2), 293–301 (2004)
Orlovsky, S.A.: Decision-making with a fuzzy preference relation. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 1(3), 155–167 (1978)
Ramanathan, R., Ganesh, L.S.: Group preference aggregation methods employed in AHP: An evaluation and an intrinsic process for deriving members’ weightages. European Journal of Operational Research 79(2), 249–265 (1994)
Saaty, T.: A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 15(3), 234–281 (1977)
Tanino, T.: Fuzzy preference orderings in group decision making. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 12(2), 117–131 (1984)
Zimmermann, H.-J.: Fuzzy programming and linear programming with several objective functions. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 1(1), 45–55 (1978)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Brunelli, M., Fullér, R., Mezei, J. (2011). Opinion Changing Aversion Functions for Group Settlement Modeling. In: Herrera-Viedma, E., García-Lapresta, J.L., Kacprzyk, J., Fedrizzi, M., Nurmi, H., Zadrożny, S. (eds) Consensual Processes. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol 267. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20533-0_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20533-0_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-20532-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-20533-0
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)