The Old Therapy for the New Problem: Declarative Configurable Process Specifications for the Adaptive Case Management Support

1. Object Management Group, Case Management Process Modeling (CMPM) Request For Proposal OMG Document: Bmi/2009-09-23 (2009)

   Google Scholar 

2. van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Challenges in Business Process Mining. BPM Center Report BPM-10-01, BPMcenter.org (2010)

   Google Scholar 

3. Wirth, N.: Program development by stepwise refinement. Communications of the ACM 14, 221–227 (1971)

   Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

4. Rosemann, M., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: A Configurable Reference ModellingLanguage. Information Systems (2007)

   Google Scholar 

5. Rychkova, I.: Formal semantics for refinement verification of entreprise models. PhD Thesis EPFL, no 4210 (2008), http://library.epfl.ch/theses/?nr=4210

6. Van der Aalst, W.M.P., Stoffele, M., Wamelink, J.W.F.: Case Handling in Construction. Automation in Construction 12(3), 303–320 (2003)

   Article  Google Scholar 

7. Regev, G., Wegmann, A.: Regulation Based Linking of Strategic Goals and Business Processes. In: Proceedings of the 3rd BPMDS Workshop on Goal-Oriented Business Process Modeling, GBPM 2002, London (2002)

   Google Scholar 

8. Nurcan, S.: A Survey on the Flexibility Requirements Related to Business Processes and Modeling Artifacts. In: Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Big Island, Hawaii, USA (2008)

   Google Scholar 

9. Dellen, B., Maurer, F., Pews, G.: Knowledge Based Techniques to Increase the Flexibility of Workflow Management. Data and Knowledge Engineering 23(3) (1997)

   Google Scholar 

10. Faustmann, G.: Enforcement vs. Freedom of Action-An Integrated Approach to Flexible Workflow Enactment. In: Workshop on Adaptive Workflow Systems. Conference (1998)

    Google Scholar 

11. Nurcan, S., Etien, A., Kaabi, A., Zoukar, I., Rolland, C.: A Strategy Driven Business Process Modelling Approach. Special issue of the Business ProcessManagement Journal on Goal-oriented business process modeling, Emerald (2005)

    Google Scholar 

12. Nurcan, S.: Business Process Modeling for developing Process Oriented IT Systems. In: The Business Process Management Tools and Technologies Track of the International IRMA Conference (2004)

    Google Scholar 

13. Object Management Group, Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN) FTF Beta 1 for Version 2.0 OMG (2009)

    Google Scholar 

14. Knoll, K., Jarvenpaa, S.L.: Information technology alignment or “fit” in highly turbulent environments:the concept of flexibility. In: Proceedings of the Computer Personnel Research Conference on Reinventing IS (1994)

    Google Scholar 

15. Heinl, P., Horn, S., Jablonski, S., Neeb, J., Stein, K., Teschke, M.: A Comprehensive Approach to Flexibility in Workflow Management Systems. In: Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Work Activities Coordination and Collaboration (1999)

    Google Scholar 

16. Khomyakov, M., Bider, I.: Achieving Workflow Flexibility through Taming the Chaos. In: OOIS 2000 - 6th International Conference on Object Oriented Information Systems, pp. 85–92. Springer, Heidelberg (2000); Reprinted in the Journal of Conceptual Modeling (2001)

    Google Scholar 

17. van der Aalst, W.M.P., Weske, M., Grünbauer, D.: Case Handling: A New Paradigm for Business Process Support. Data Knowl. Eng. 53(2), 129–162 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

18. Rychkova, I., Regev, G., Wegmann, A.: Declarative Specification and Alignment Verification of Services in ITIL. In: First International Workshop on Dynamic and Declarative Business Processes (DDBP 2008), Munich, Germany (2008)

    Google Scholar 

19. Rychkova, I., Regev, G., Wegmann, A.: Using Declarative Specifications. In: Business Process Design. International Journal of Computer Science & Applications (2008)

    Google Scholar 

20. La Rosa, M., Dumas, M., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Mendling, J.: Configurable multi-perspective business process models. Preprint submitted to Information Systems (2009), Available at QUT Digital Repository: http://eprints.qut.edu.au/

21. La Rosa, M., Dumas, M., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Mendling, J., Gottschalk, F.: Beyond Control-Flow: Extending Business Process Configuration to Roles and Objects. In: Li, Q., Spaccapietra, S., Yu, E., Olivé, A. (eds.) ER 2008. LNCS, vol. 5231, pp. 199–215. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

22. Mendling, J., La Rosa, M., ter Hofstede, A.H.M.: Correctness of Business Process Models with Roles and Objects. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2008)

    Google Scholar 

23. Jablonski, S., Bussler, C.: Workflow Management: Modeling Concepts, Architecture, and Implementation. International Thomson Computer Press (1996)

    Google Scholar 

24. Jackson, D.: Software Abstractions: Logic, Language, and Analysis. MIT Press, Cambridge (2006)

    Google Scholar 

25. Rolland, C., Nurcan, S., Grosz, G.: Enterprise Knowledge Development: the process view. Information and Management Journal 36(3), 165–184 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

26. Nurcan, S., Schmidt, R.: Service-oriented Enterprise Architecture for Enterprise Engineering: Introduction. In: Proceedings of EDOC 2009 IEEE Workshops and Short papers (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references