Abstract
Since their inception, multi-objective evolutionary algorithms have been adequately applied in finding a diverse approximation of efficient fronts of multi-objective optimization problems. In contrast, if we look at the rich history of classical multi-objective algorithms, we find that incorporation of user preferences has always been a major thrust of research. In this paper, we provide a general structure for incorporating preference information using multi-objective evolutionary algorithms. This is done in an NSGA-II scheme and by considering trade-off based preferences that come from so called proper Pareto-optimal solutions. We argue that finding proper Pareto-optimal solutions requires a set to compare with and hence, population based approaches should be a natural choice. Moreover, we suggest some practical modifications to the classical notion of proper Pareto-optimality. Computational studies on a number of test problems of varying complexity demonstrate the efficiency of multi-objective evolutionary algorithms in finding the complete preferred region for a large class of complex problems. We also discuss a theoretical justification for our NSGA-II based framework.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Deb, K.: Innovization: Extracting innovative solution principles through multiobjective optimization. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
Miettinen, K.: Nonlinear Multiobjective Optimization. Kluwer, Boston (1999)
Geoffrion, A.M.: Proper efficiency and the theory of vector maximization. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 22, 618–630 (1968)
Shukla, P.K.: In search of proper pareto-optimal solutions using multi-objective evolutionary algorithms. In: Shi, Y., van Albada, G.D., Dongarra, J., Sloot, P.M.A. (eds.) ICCS 2007. LNCS, vol. 4490, pp. 1013–1020. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
Branke, J., Kauβler, T., Schmeck, H.: Guidance in evolutionary multi-objective optimization. Advances in Engineering Software 32, 499–507 (2001)
Deb, K.: Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms. Wiley, Chichester (2001)
Huang, V.L., Qin, A.K., Deb, K., Zitzler, E., Suganthan, P.N., Liang, J.J., Preuss, M., Huband, S.: Problem definitions for performance assessment of multi-objective optimization algorithms. Technical report, NTU, Singapore (2007)
Deb, K., Thiele, L., Laumanns, M., Zitzler, E.: Scalable test problems for evolutionary multi-objective optimization. In: Abraham, A., et al. (eds.) Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization, pp. 105–145. Springer, London (2005)
Huband, S., Hingston, P., Barone, L., White, L.: A review of multi-objective test problems and a scalable test problem toolkit. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 10, 280–294 (2005)
Fonesca, C.M., Fleming, P.J.: On the performance assessment and comparison of stochastic multiobjective optimizers. In: Ebeling, W., Rechenberg, I., Voigt, H.-M., Schwefel, H.-P. (eds.) PPSN 1996. LNCS, vol. 1141, pp. 584–593. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Shukla, P.K., Hirsch, C., Schmeck, H. (2010). A Framework for Incorporating Trade-Off Information Using Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms. In: Schaefer, R., Cotta, C., Kołodziej, J., Rudolph, G. (eds) Parallel Problem Solving from Nature, PPSN XI. PPSN 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6239. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15871-1_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15871-1_14
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-15870-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-15871-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)