The Future of Style

1. Abt C (1970) Serious games. Viking, New York, NY

   Google Scholar 

2. Bense M (1965) Aesthetica: einführung in die neue aesthetik. Agis-Verlag, Baden-Baden

   Google Scholar 

3. Berns G (2005) Satisfaction: the science of finding true fulfillment. Henry Holt, New York, NY

   Google Scholar 

4. Boden M (1991) The creative mind: myths and mechanisms. Basic Books, New York, NY

   Google Scholar 

5. Böhm G, Brun W (2008) Intuition and affect in risk perception and decision making. Judgm Decis Mak 3(1):1–4

   Google Scholar 

6. Burns K (2007) EVE’s entropy: a formal gauge of fun in games. Stud Comput Intell 71: 153–173

   Article  Google Scholar 

7. Burns K (2006) Atoms of EVE’: a Bayesian basis for aesthetic analysis of style in sketching. Artif Intell Eng Design Anal Manuf 20:185–199

   Google Scholar 

8. Burns K (2004) Creature double feature: on style and subject in the art of caricature. Papers from the AAAI symposium on style and meaning in language, art, music, and design, FS-04–07, AAAI, Menlo Park, CA, pp 7–14

   Google Scholar 

9. Burns K (2004) Painting pictures to augment advice. In: Proceedings of the working conference on advanced visual interfaces, Gallipoli, Italy, pp 344–349

   Google Scholar 

10. Burns K, Dubnov S (2006) Memex music and gambling games: EVE’s take on lucky number 13. In: Proceedings of the AAAI workshop on computational aesthetics: artificial intelligence approaches to beauty and happiness, WS-06–04, AAAI, Menlo Park, CA, pp 30–36

    Google Scholar 

11. Csikszentmihalyi M (1991) Flow: the psychology of optimal experience. Harper Collins, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

12. Damasio A (1994) Descartes’ error: emotion, reason, and the human brain. Grosset/Putnam, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

13. Demaree H, DeDonno M, Burns K, Everhart D (2008) You bet: how personality differences affect risk-taking preferences. Pers Individ Dif 44:1484–1494

    Article  Google Scholar 

14. Doyle J, Radzicki M, Rose A, Trees W (1998) Using cognitive styles typology to explain individual differences in dynamic decision making: much ado about nothing. Center Qual Manag J 6(3):1–15

    Google Scholar 

15. Düchting H (1997) Paul Klee: painting music. Prestel-Verlag, Munich

    Google Scholar 

16. Ellsworth P, Scherer K (2003) Appraisal processes in emotion. In: Davidson R, Scherer K, Goldsmith H (eds) Handbook of affective sciences. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 572–595

    Google Scholar 

17. Gardner H (1983) Frames of mind: the theory of multiple intelligences. Basic Books, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

18. Goguen J (ed) (1999) Art and the brain. J Conscious Stud: Controvers Sci Humanit 6: 5–175

    Google Scholar 

19. Groopman J (2007) How doctors think. Houghton Mifflin, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

20. Hoffman R, Hayes P (2004) The pleasure principle. IEEE Intell Sys January/February:86–89

    Google Scholar 

21. Hogan P (2003) Cognitive science, literature, and the arts. Routledge, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

22. Hudlicka E (2003) To feel or not to feel: the role of affect in human-computer interaction. Int J Human-Comput Stud 59:1–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

23. Huron D (2006) Sweet anticipation: music and the psychology of expectation. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

24. Koster R (2005) A theory of fun for game design. Paraglyph, Scottsdale, AZ

    Google Scholar 

25. Lazarus R (1999) The cognition-emotion debate: a bit of history. In: Dalgleish T, Power M (eds) Handbook of cognition and emotion. Wiley, New York, NY pp 3–19

    Google Scholar 

26. LeDoux J (1996) The emotional brain: the mysterious underpinnings of emotional life. Simon & Schuster, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

27. Levitin D (2006) This is your brain on music. Dutton, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

28. Malina R (2006) A forty-year perspective on aesthetic computing in the Leonardo Journal. In: Fishwick P (ed) Aesthetic computing. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 43–52

    Google Scholar 

29. Marr D (1982) Vision: a computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. W. H. Freeman, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

30. Maybury M, Stock O, Wahlster W (2006) Intelligent interactive entertainment grand challenges. IEEE Intell Sys 21(5):14–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

31. Maybury M, Greiff W, Boykin S, Ponte J, McHenry C, Ferro L (2004) Personalcasting: tailored broadcast news. Int J User Model User-Adapt Interact 14(1):119–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

32. McCorduck P (1991) Aaron’s code: meta-art, artificial intelligence, and the work of Harold Cohen. W. H. Freeman, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

33. Miller A (1996) Insights of genius: imagery and creativity in science and art. Springer, New York, NY

    Book  Google Scholar 

34. Minsky M (2006) The emotion machine: commonsense thinking, artificial intelligence, and the future of the human mind. Simon & Schuster, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

35. Mithin S (2006) The singing Neanderthals: the origins of music, language, mind, and body. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

36. Moles A (1966). Information theory and esthetic perception (trans: Cohen J). University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL

    Google Scholar 

37. Morgan J (1977) Linguistics: the relation of pragmatics to semantics and syntax. Ann Rev Anthropol 6:57–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

38. Myers I, McCaulley M (1985) A guide to the development and use of the Myers-Briggs type indicator. Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA

    Google Scholar 

39. Narmour E (1992) The analysis and cognition of melodic complexity: the implication-realization model. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL

    Google Scholar 

40. Norman D (2004) Emotional design: why we love (or hate) everyday things. Basic Books, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

41. Parsons M (1987) How we understand art: a cognitive developmental account of aesthetic experience. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

42. Peters E, Västfjäll D, Gärling T, Slovic P (2006) Affect and decision making: a “hot” topic. J Behav Decis Mak 19:79–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

43. Picard R (1997) Affective computing. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

44. Plutchik R (1985) On emotion: the chicken-and-egg problem revisited. Motiv Emot 9:197–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

45. Postrel V (2003) The substance of style: how the rise of aesthetic value is remaking commerce, culture, and consciousness. Harper Collins, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

46. Prensky M (2001) Digital game-based learning. McGraw Hill, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

47. Rothstein E (1995) Emblems of mind: the inner life of music and mathematics. Avon, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

48. Salen K, Zimmerman E (2004) Rules of play: game design fundamentals. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

49. Scherer K (1999) Appraisal theory. In: Dalgleish T, Power M (eds) Handbook of cognition and emotion. Wiley, New York, NY pp 637–663

    Google Scholar 

50. Shannon C, Weaver W (1949) The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL

    Google Scholar 

51. Silvia P (2005) Emotional responses to art: from collation and arousal to cognition and emotion. Rev General Psychol 9(4):342–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

52. Sloman A, Croucher M (1981) Why robots will have emotions. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on AI, Vancouver, BC, pp 197–202

    Google Scholar 

53. Temperley D (2007) Music and probability. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

54. Weizenbaum J (1976) Computer power and human reason: from judgment to calculation. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, CA

    Google Scholar 

55. Willats J (1997) Art and representation: new principles in the analysis of pictures. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

56. Wilson S (2002) Information arts: intersections of art, science, and technology. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

Download references