Market Driven Product Ontologies

1. Hartley, R.F.: Marketing mistakes and Successes. John Wiley, New York (2000). Barton, D.L.: Wellsprings of Knowledge: Building and Sustaining the Sources of Innovation. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (1995)

   Google Scholar 

2. Morwitz, V.G., Steckel, J.H., Gupta, A.: When Do Purchase Intensions Predict Sales? Working Paper. Marketing Science Institute, Cambridge, MA (1997)

   Google Scholar 

3. List, D.: Market research methods for innovation development: an overview, http://www.unisa.edu.au/cid/publications/methods/npdresearch.pdf

4. Baarda, B., de Goede, M.: Basisboek Methoden en Technieken: Handleiding voor het opzetten en uitvoeren van onderzoek. Wolters-Noordhoff, Groningen (2001)

   Google Scholar 

5. Küpper, G.: Advertisers & Agencies Relationship Index – April 2007. GreenHouse BBC, http://www.greenhouse-bbc.com/aari/aari_resultaten.pdf

6. Hepp, M.: Possible Ontologies: How Reality Constrains the Development of Relevant Ontologies. IEEE Internet Computing 11(1), 90–96 (2007)

   Article  Google Scholar 

7. Hepp, M.: Op. Cit., p. 91 (figure borrowed)

   Google Scholar 

8. Van Damme, C., Hepp, M., Siorpaes, K.: FolksOntology: An Integrated Approach for Turning Folksonomies into Ontologies. In: Proceedings of the ESWC 2007 Workshop "Bridging the Gap between Semantic Web and Web 2.0", Innsbruck, Austria (2007). Siorpaes, K., Hepp, M.: myOntology: The Marriage of Ontology Engineering and Collective Intelligence. In: Proceedings of the ESWC 2007 Workshop "Bridging the Gap between Semantic Web and Web 2.0", Innsbruck, Austria (2007)

   Google Scholar 

9. Pinto, H.S., Martins, J.P.: Ontologies: How Can They Be Built? Knowledge and Information Systems 6, 441–464 (2004)

   Article  Google Scholar 

10. Menzies, T.: Cost benefits of ontologies. Intelligence 10(3), 26–32 (1999) (Although written eight years ago, this work is still pretty much valid)

    Google Scholar 

11. Paslaru Bontas Simperl, E., Tempich, C., Mochol, M.: Cost estimation for ontology development: applying the ONTOCOM model, http://ontocom.ag-nbi.de/docs/bis2006.pdf

12. List, D.: Market research methods for innovation development: an overview,

    Google Scholar 

13. Pierson, J., Jacobs, A., Dreessen, K., Lievens, B., Van den Broeck, I., Van den Broeck, W.: Walking the interface: uncovering practices through proxy technology assessment. In: EPIC 2006, Portland (USA) (2006)

    Google Scholar 

14. Hepp, M.: The True Complexity of Product Representation in the Semantic Web. In: ECIS 2006. Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Information System, Gothenburg, Sweden (2006)

    Google Scholar 

15. Peirce, C.: How to make our ideas clear. In: Hooper, J. (ed.) Peirce On Signs, pp. 160–179. The University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill (1991)

    Google Scholar 

16. Rapaille, C.: The Culture Code: Why People Around the World are Different, And the Hidden Clues to Understanding Them. Bantam Dell, New York (2006) (The shape of a car is in fact often a semiotic construct based on market research methods)

    Google Scholar 

17. IPGems: (Some initiatives have been undertaken to create a ‘usability ontology’) http://www.ipgems.com/content/usability_ontology_upa2007.html

18. de Moor, A., De Leenheer, P., Meersman, R.A.: DOGMA-MESS: A Meaning Evolution Support System for Interorganizational Ontology Engineering. In: Alexandrov, V.N., van Albada, G.D., Sloot, P.M.A., Dongarra, J.J. (eds.) ICCS 2006. LNCS, vol. 3991, Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Google Scholar 

Download references