[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Self-configuring Cost-Sensitive Hierarchical Clustering with Recourse

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 11008))

Abstract

We revisit algorithm selection for declarative programming solvers. We introduce two main ideas to improve cost-sensitive hierarchical clustering: First, to augment the portfolio builder with a self-configuration component. And second, we propose that the algorithm selector assesses the confidence level of its own prediction, so that a more defensive recourse action can be used to overturn the original recommendation.

This work was financially supported in part by TIN2016-76573-C2-2-P.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    We use the term constraint program to describe all related declarative programming problems, such as mathematical programming, satisfiability, sat modulo theories, quantified Boolean formulae, and of course actual constraint programming.

References

  1. Ansotegui, C., Malitsky, Y., Samulowitz, H., Sellmann, M., Tierney, K.: Model-based genetic algorithms for algorithm configuration. In: IJCAI, pp. 733–739 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bischl, B., et al.: ASlib: a benchmark library for algorithm selection. Artif. Intell. 237, 41–58 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Cameron, C., Hoos, H.H., Leyton-Brown, K., Hutter, F.: OASC-2017:* zilla submission. In: Open Algorithm Selection Challenge 2017, pp. 15–18 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kadioglu, S., Malitsky, Y., Sabharwal, A., Samulowitz, H., Sellmann, M.: Algorithm selection and scheduling. In: CP, pp. 454–469 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Leyton-Brown, K., Nudelman, E., Andrew, G., McFadden, J., Shoham, Y.: A portfolio approach to algorithm selection. In: IJCAI, pp. 1542–1543 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Leyton-Brown, K., Nudelman, E., Shoham, Y.: Empirical hardness models: methodology and a case study on combinatorial auctions. J. ACM (JACM) 56(4), 22 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Lindauer, M., van Rijn, J., Kotthoff, L.: Open algorithm selection challenge 2017: setup and scenarios. In: Open Algorithm Selection Challenge 2017, pp. 1–7 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lindauer, M., van Rijn, J.N., Kotthoff, L.: The Algorithm Selection Competition Series 2015–17. ArXiv e-prints, May 2018

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lindauer, M., Hutter, F., Hoos, H.H., Schaub, T.: AutoFolio: an automatically configured algorithm selector (extended abstract). In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI 2017, Melbourne, Australia, 19–25 August 2017, pp. 5025–5029 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Liu, T., Amadini, R., Mauro, J.: Sunny with algorithm configuration. In: Open Algorithm Selection Challenge 2017, pp. 12–14 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Malitsky, Y., Sabharwal, A., Samulowitz, H., Sellmann, M.: Algorithm portfolios based on cost-sensitive hierarchical clustering. In: IJCAI, pp. 608–614 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Malitsky, Y., Sabharwal, A., Samulowitz, H., Sellmann, M.: Boosting sequential solver portfolios: knowledge sharing and accuracy prediction. In: 7th International Conference on Learning and Intelligent Optimization, LION 7, Catania, Italy, pp. 153–167 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  13. O’Mahony, E., Hebrard, E., Holland, A., Nugent, C., O’Sullivan, B.: Using case-based reasoning in an algorithm portfolio for constraint solving. In: Irish Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Science (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Xu, L., Hutter, F., Hoos, H., Leyton-Brown, K.: SATzilla: portfolio-based algorithm selection for sat. JAIR 32(1), 565–606 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Xu, L., Hutter, F., Shen, J., Hoos, H., Leyton-Brown, K.: SATzilla2012: improved algorithm selection based on cost-sensitive classification models. In: SAT Competition (2012)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Paderborn Center for Parallel Computation (PC\(^2\)) for the use of their high throughput cluster and Marius Lindauer for his kind help with the OASC benchmarks.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kevin Tierney .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ansotegui, C., Sellmann, M., Tierney, K. (2018). Self-configuring Cost-Sensitive Hierarchical Clustering with Recourse. In: Hooker, J. (eds) Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming. CP 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11008. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98334-9_34

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98334-9_34

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-98333-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-98334-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics