[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Comparison of Two Methods to Control the Mouse Using a Keypad

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computers Helping People with Special Needs (ICCHP 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 9759))

Abstract

This paper presents a user study comparing two methods for keyboard-driven mouse replacement: CKM, an active Conventional Keyboard Mouse, and DualMouse, an innovative keyboard technique allowing stepwise, recursive target acquisition. Both strategies are implemented in the pointing component of OnScreenDualScribe, a comprehensive assistive software system that turns a compact keypad into a universal input device. The study involves eight non-disabled participants and a single user with Friedreich Ataxia. The results reveal that CKM yields about 60 % higher throughput that DualMouse. However, the DualMouse technique is preferable for certain specific tasks. Our intention with this research is to gain new insights into OnScreenDualScribe and to inspire future developers of mouse-replacement interfaces for persons with physical disabilities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Each participant also did one post-experiment block of trials using a mouse. The mean throughput for the mouse trials was 4.26 bits/s.

References

  1. Branson, D., Demchak, M.: The use of augmentative and alternative communication methods with infants and toddlers with disabilities: a research review. Augmentative Altern. Commun. 25(4), 274–286 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Card, S.K., Newell, A., Moran, T.P.: The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction. L. Erlbaum Associates Inc., Hillsdale (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Felzer, T., MacKenzie, I., Rinderknecht, S.: DualScribe: a keyboard replacement for those with Friedreich’s ataxia and related diseases. In: Miesenberger, K., Karshmer, A., Penaz, P., Zagler, W. (eds.) ICCHP 2012, Part II. LNCS, vol. 7383, pp. 431–438. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Felzer, T., MacKenzie, I., Rinderknecht, S.: Applying small-keyboard computer control to the real world. In: Miesenberger, K., Fels, D., Archambault, D., Peňáz, P., Zagler, W. (eds.) ICCHP 2014, Part II. LNCS, vol. 8548, pp. 180–187. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Felzer, T., MacKenzie, I.S., Rinderknecht, S.: Efficient computer operation for users with a neuromuscular disease with OnScreenDualScribe. J. Interact. Sci. 2(2) (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Felzer, T., Rinderknecht, S.: Mouse mode of OnScreenDualScribe: three types of keyboard-driven mouse replacement. In: CHI EA, pp. 1593–1598. ACM (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jansen, A., Findlater, L., Wobbrock, J.O.: From the lab to the world: lessons from extending a pointing technique for real-world use. In: CHI EA,. pp. 1867–1872. ACM (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  8. John, B.E., Kieras, D.E.: Using GOMS for user interface design and evaluation: Which technique? ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. (TOCHI) 3(4), 287–319 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. MacKenzie, I.S.: Human-Computer Interaction: An Empirical Research Perspective. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Magee, J., Felzer, T., MacKenzie, I.S.: Camera Mouse + ClickerAID: Dwell vs. single-muscle click actuation in mouse-replacement interfaces. In: Antona, M., Stephanidis, C. (eds.) Universal Access in HCI. LNCS, vol. 9175, pp. 74–84. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Newell, A.F., Gregor, P., Alm, N.: HCI for older and disabled people in the Queen Mother Research Centre at Dundee University, Scotland. In: CHI EA, pp. 299–302. ACM (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Saulynas, S., Albar, L., Kuber, R., Felzer, T.: Using OnScreenDualScribe to support text entry and targeting among individuals with physical disabilities. In: Proceedings of ASSETS, pp. 303–304. ACM (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Soni, D.M.: A review on Friedreich Ataxia, a neurodegenerative disorder. J. Drug Deliv. Ther. 4(6), 45–52 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Soukoreff, R.W., MacKenzie, I.S.: Towards a standard for pointing device evaluation, perspectives on 27 years of Fitts’ law research in HCI. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 61(6), 751–789 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Williams, M.R., Kirsch, R.F.: Evaluation of head orientation and neck muscle EMG signals as command inputs to a human-computer interface for individuals with high tetraplegia. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 16(5), 485–496 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wobbrock, J.O., Fogarty, J., Liu, S., Kimuro, S., Harada, S.: The angle mouse: target-agnostic dynamic gain adjustment based on angular deviation. In: CHI, pp. 1401–1410. ACM (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zhai, S., Morimoto, C., Ihde, S.: Manual and gaze input cascaded (MAGIC) pointing. In: Proceedings of the CHI, pp. 246–253. ACM (1999)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is partially supported by DFG grant FE 936/6-2 “EFFENDI – EFficient and Fast text ENtry for persons with motor Disabilities of neuromuscular orIgin”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ian Scott MacKenzie .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Felzer, T., MacKenzie, I.S., Magee, J. (2016). Comparison of Two Methods to Control the Mouse Using a Keypad. In: Miesenberger, K., Bühler, C., Penaz, P. (eds) Computers Helping People with Special Needs. ICCHP 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9759. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41267-2_72

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41267-2_72

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-41266-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-41267-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics