Factors Affecting the Performance of Tourism Crowdfunding Projects: An Empirical Study

• Agrawal, A., Catalini, C., & Goldfarb, A. (2010). The geography of crowdfunding. NET Institute Working Paper No. 10-08. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1692661

• Balboni, B., Kocollari, U., & Pais, I. (2014). How can social enterprises develop successful crowdfunding campaigns? An empirical analysis on Italian context. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2430463

• Beier, M., & Wagner, K. (2014). Crowdfunding success of tourism projects – evidence from Switzerland. e-Review of tourism research (eRTR), Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2520925

• Belleflamme, P., & Lambert, T. (2014). Crowdfunding: Some empirical findings and microeconomic underpinnings. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2437786

• Belleflamme, P., Lambert, T., & Schwienbacher, A. (2014). Crowdfunding: Tapping the right crowd. [Article]. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(5), 585–609.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Boeuf, B., Darveau, J., & Legoux, R. (2014). Financing creativity: Crowdfunding as a new approach for theatre projects [Article]. International Journal of Arts Management, 16(3), 33–48.

  Google Scholar 

• Burns, C. (2013). Crowdfunding far from niche in 2015. Retrieved Jan. 16, 2015, from http://kae.com/ideabank/crowdfunding-far-from-niche-in-2015-2/

• Cardon, M., Sudek, R., & Mitteness, C. (2009). The impact of perceived entrepreneurial passion on angel investing. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 29(2), 1–15.

  Google Scholar 

• Cumming, D. J., Leboeuf, G., & Schwienbacher, A. (2014). Crowdfunding models: Keep-it-all vs. all-or-nothing. Paris December 2014 Finance meeting EUROFIDAI – AFFI Paper. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2447567

• Duan, W., Gu, B., & Whinston, A. B. (2009). Informational cascades and software adoption on the internet: An empirical investigation. Mis Quarterly, 33(1), 23–48.

  Google Scholar 

• Flanagin, A. J., & Metzger, M. J. (2013). Trusting expert- versus user-generated ratings online: The role of information volume, valence, and consumer characteristics. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1626–1634.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Galuszka, P., & Bystrov, V. (2014). Crowdfunding: A case study of a new model of financing music production. Journal of Internet Commerce, 13(3-4), 233–252.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Greene, W. H., & Zhang, C. (2003). Econometric analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

  Google Scholar 

• Howe, J. (2008). Crowdsourcing. Why the power of the crowd is driving future of business. New York: Three Rivers Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Hu, N., Bose, I., Koh, N. S., & Liu, L. (2012). Manipulation of online reviews: An analysis of ratings, readability, and sentiments. Decision Support Systems, 52(3), 674–684.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hu, N., Koh, N. S., & Reddy, S. K. (2014). Ratings lead you to the product, reviews help you clinch it? The mediating role of online review sentiments on product sales. Decision Support Systems, 57, 42–53.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ibrahim, N., & Verliyantina. (2012). The model of crowdfunding to support small and micro businesses in Indonesia through a web-based platform. [Proceedings Paper]. International conference on small and medium enterprises development with a theme ‘innovation and sustainability in SME development’ (Icsmed 2012), 4, 390–397.

  Google Scholar 

• Inbar, Y., & Barzilay, O. (2014). Community impact on crowdfunding performance. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2524910

• Joenssen, D. W., Michaelis, A., & Müllerleile, T. (2014). A link to new product preannouncement: Success factors in crowdfunding. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2476841

• Kleemann, F., Voβ, G. G., & Rieder, K. (2008). Under paid innovators: The commercial utilization of consumer work through crowdsourcing. Science, Technology and Innovation Studies, 4(1), 5–26.

  Google Scholar 

• Koning, R., & Model, J. (2013). Social influence mechanisms in crowdfunding cascades: When nothing is better than something. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2308161

• Kremer, S., & Nautz, D. (2013). Short-term herding of institutional traders: New evidence from the German stock market. European Financial Management, 19(4), 730–746.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kuppuswamy, V., & Bayus, B. L. (2014). Crowdfunding creative ideas: The dynamics of project backers in Kickstarter. UNC Kenan-Flagler Research Paper No. 2013-15. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2234765

• Lehner, O. M. (2014). The formation and interplay of social capital in crowdfunded social ventures [Article]. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 26(5–6), 478–499.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Li, Z., & Duan, J. A. (2014). Dynamic strategies for successful online crowdfunding. NET Institute Working Paper No. 14-09. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2506352

• Lu, Q., Xiao, L., & Ye, Q. (2012). Investigating the impact of online word-of-mouth on hotel sales with panel data. In L. Hua (Ed.), 2012 International conference on management science and engineering (pp. 3–9).

  Google Scholar 

• Mollick, E. (2014). The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study [Article]. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(1), 1–16.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Noyes, K. (2014). Why investors are pouring millions into crowdfunding. Retrieved Jan. 16, 2015, from http://fortune.com/2014/04/17/why-investors-are-pouring-millions-into-crowdfunding/

• Parker, S. C. (2014). Crowdfunding, cascades and informed investors. IZA Discussion Paper No. 7994. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2403130

• Pierdzioch, C., & Rulke, J. C. (2012). Forecasting stock prices: Do forecasters herd? Economics Letters, 116(3), 326–329.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Qiu, C. (2013). Issues in crowdfunding: Theoretical and empirical investigation on kickstarter. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2345872

• Riedl, C., Blohm, I., Leimeister, J. M., & Krcmar, H. (2013). The effect of rating scales on decision quality and user attitudes in online innovation communities. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 17(3), 7–36.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Trevolta. (2014). What is this all about, again? Retrieved October 20, 2014, from http://www.trevolta.com/faq

• Veall, M. R., & Zimmermann, K. F. (1996). Pseudo-R² measures for some common limited dependent variable models. Journal of Economic Surveys, 10(3), 241–259.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ye, Q., Cheng, Z., & Fang, B. (2013). Learning from other buyers: The effect of purchase history records in online marketplaces. Decision Support Systems, 56, 502–512.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Yum, H., Lee, B., & Chae, M. (2012). From the wisdom of crowds to my own judgment in microfinance through online peer-to-peer lending platforms. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 11(5), 469–483.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Zheng, H. C., Li, D. H., Wu, J., & Xu, Y. (2014). The role of multidimensional social capital in crowdfunding: A comparative study in China and US [Article]. Information and Management, 51(4), 488–496.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Zvilichovsky, D., Inbar, Y., & Barzilay, O. (2014). Playing both sides of the market: Success and reciprocity on crowdfunding platforms. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2304101

Download references