[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

An Empirical Analysis of Intervention Strategies’ Effectiveness for Countering Misinformation Amplification by Recommendation Algorithms

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Information Retrieval (ECIR 2024)

Abstract

Social network platforms connect people worldwide, facilitating communication, information sharing, and personal/professional networking. They use recommendation algorithms to personalize content and enhance user experiences. However, these algorithms can unintentionally amplify misinformation by prioritizing engagement over accuracy. For instance, recent works suggest that popularity-based and network-based recommendation algorithms contribute the most to misinformation diffusion. In our study, we present an exploration on two Twitter datasets to understand the impact of intervention techniques on combating misinformation amplification initiated by recommendation algorithms. We simulate various scenarios and evaluate the effectiveness of intervention strategies in social sciences such as Virality Circuit Breakers and accuracy nudges. Our findings highlight that these intervention strategies are generally successful when applied on top of collaborative filtering and content-based recommendation algorithms, while having different levels of effectiveness depending on the number of users keen to spread fake news present in the dataset.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Fake news is a form of misinformation consisting of false or misleading information presented as news with the intent of manipulating people’s perceptions of real facts, events, and statements. Although they are distinct terms, in this paper, we use “fake news” and “misinformation” interchangeably.

References

  1. Bak-Coleman, J.B., et al.: Combining interventions to reduce the spread of viral misinformation (Jun 2022). https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-022-01388-6

  2. Barberá, P.: Explaining the spread of misinformation on social media: evidence from the 2016 us presidential election. In: Symposium: Fake News and the Politics of Misinformation. APSA (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bode, L., Vraga, E.K.: In related news, that was wrong: the correction of misinformation through related stories functionality in social media. J. Commun. 65(4), 619–638 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Castells, P., Hurley, N.J., Vargas, S.: Novelty and diversity in recommender systems. In: Ricci, F., Rokach, L., Shapira, B. (eds.) Recommender Systems Handbook, pp. 881–918. Springer, Boston, MA (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7637-6_26

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Cheng, M., Yin, C., Nazarian, S., Bogdan, P.: Deciphering the laws of social network-transcendent covid-19 misinformation dynamics and implications for combating misinformation phenomena. Sci. Rep. 11(1), 1–14 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dai, E., Sun, Y., Wang, S.: Ginger cannot cure cancer: battling fake health news with a comprehensive data repository (2020). https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2002.00837, https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.00837

  7. Del Vicario, M., et al.: The spreading of misinformation online. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 113(3), 554–559 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. DiFranzo, D., Gloria-Garcia, K.: Filter bubbles and fake news. XRDS: crossroads, the ACM magazine for students, vol. 23(3), pp. 32–35 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Doe, C., Knezevic, V., Zeng, M., Spezzano, F., Babinkostova, L.: Modeling the time to share fake and real news in online social networks. Inter. J. Data Sci. Anal., 1–10 (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ekstrand, M.D.: Lenskit for python: next-generation software for recommender systems experiments. In: Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (Oct 2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3340531.3412778

  11. Elahi, M., et al.: Towards responsible media recommendation. AI and Ethics, pp. 1–12 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Epstein, Z., Berinsky, A., Cole, R., Gully, A., Pennycook, G.: Developing an accuracy-prompt toolkit to reduce covid-19 misinformation online. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Rev. 2 (2021). https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-71

  13. Fernández, M., Bellogín, A., Cantador, I.: Analysing the effect of recommendation algorithms on the amplification of misinformation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.14748 (2021)

  14. Fox, M.: Fake news lies spread faster on social media than truth does. https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/fake-news-lies-spread-faster-social-media-truth-does-n854896/ (2018). (Accessed 13 October 2023)

  15. Furini, M., Mirri, S., Montangero, M., Prandi, C.: Untangling between fake-news and truth in social media to understand the covid-19 coronavirus. In: 2020 IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications (ISCC), pp. 1–6. IEEE (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Guess, A., Nagler, J., Tucker, J.: Less than you think: prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on facebook. Sci. Adv. 5(1), eaau4586 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hu, Y., Koren, Y., Volinsky, C.: Collaborative filtering for implicit feedback datasets. In: 2008 Eighth IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, pp. 263–272 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDM.2008.22

  18. Jamali, M., Ester, M.: A matrix factorization technique with trust propagation for recommendation in social networks. In: Proceedings of the Fourth ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, RecSys 2010, pp. 135–142. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2010). https://doi.org/10.1145/1864708.1864736

  19. Ji, Y., Sun, A., Zhang, J., Li, C.: A re-visit of the popularity baseline in recommender systems. In: Proceedings of the 43rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 1749–1752 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jin, F., Dougherty, E., Saraf, P., Cao, Y., Ramakrishnan, N.: Epidemiological modeling of news and rumors on twitter. In: Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on Social Network Mining and Analysis, SNAKDD 2013, Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2013). https://doi.org/10.1145/2501025.2501027

  21. Jin, F., Dougherty, E., Saraf, P., Cao, Y., Ramakrishnan, N.: Epidemiological modeling of news and rumors on twitter. In: Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on Social Network Mining and Analysis, pp. 1–9 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Joy, A., Shrestha, A., Spezzano, F.: Are you influenced?: modeling the diffusion of fake news in social media. In: Coscia, M., Cuzzocrea, A., Shu, K., Klamma, R., O’Halloran, S., Rokne, J.G. (eds.) ASONAM 2021: International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining, Virtual Event, The Netherlands, 8 - 11 November 2021, pp. 184–188. ACM (2021), https://doi.org/10.1145/3487351.3488345

  23. Kempe, D., Kleinberg, J., Tardos, É.: Maximizing the spread of influence through a social network. In: SIGKDD, pp. 137–146 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kozyreva, A., Lorenz-Spreen, P., Herzog, S., Ecker, U., Lewandowsky, S., Hertwig, R.: Toolbox of interventions against online misinformation and manipulation (Dec 2022). https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/x8ejt

  25. Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U.K., Cook, J.: Beyond misinformation: Understanding and coping with the “post-truth” era. J. Appl. Res. Mem. Cogn. 6(4), 353–369 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Li, Y., Fan, J., Wang, Y., Tan, K.L.: Influence maximization on social graphs: a survey. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 30(10), 1852–1872 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lo, K.C., Dai, S.C., Xiong, A., Jiang, J., Ku, L.W.: All the wiser: fake news intervention using user reading preferences. In: Proceedings of the 14th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, pp. 1069–1072 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lo, K.C., Dai, S.C., Xiong, A., Jiang, J., Ku, L.W.: Victor: an implicit approach to mitigate misinformation via continuous verification reading. In: Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2022, WWW 2022, pp. 3511–3519. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2022). https://doi.org/10.1145/3485447.3512246

  29. Lops, P., Gemmis, M.d., Semeraro, G.: Content-based recommender systems: state of the art and trends. In: Recommender Systems Handbook, pp. 73–105 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Mendoza, M., Poblete, B., Castillo, C.: Twitter under crisis: can we trust what we rt? In: Proceedings of the First Workshop on Social Media Analytics, SOMA 2010, pp. 71–79. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2010). https://doi.org/10.1145/1964858.1964869

  31. Murayama, T., Wakamiya, S., Aramaki, E., Kobayashi, R.: Modeling the spread of fake news on twitter. PLOS ONE 16(4), 1–16 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0250419

  32. Nyhan, B., Reifler, J.: When corrections fail: the persistence of political misperceptions. Polit. Behav. 32(2), 303–330 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Pariser, E.: The filter bubble: what the Internet is hiding from you. Penguin UK (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Pathak, R., Lakha, B., Raut, R., Kim, H.S., Spezzano, F.: Unveiling truth amidst the pandemic: multimodal detection of covid-19 unreliable news. In: Ceolin, D., Caselli, T., Tulin, M. (eds.) Disinformation in Open Online Media, pp. 119–131. Springer Nature Switzerland, Cham (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47896-3_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  35. Pathak, R., Spezzano, F., Pera, M.S.: Understanding the contribution of recommendation algorithms on misinformation recommendation and misinformation dissemination on social networks. ACM Trans. Web 17(4) (2023). https://doi.org/10.1145/3616088

  36. Pennycook, G., Bear, A., Collins, E.T., Rand, D.G.: The implied truth effect: attaching warnings to a subset of fake news headlines increases perceived accuracy of headlines without warnings. Management Science 66(11), 4944–4957 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2019.3478

  37. Pennycook, G., Rand, D.G.: The implied truth effect: a replication and extension. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 149(5), 849–857 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Raza, S., Ding, C.: News recommender system: a review of recent progress, challenges, and opportunities. Artif. Intell. Rev. 55(1), 749–800 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-021-10043-x

  39. Resnick, P., Iacovou, N., Suchak, M., Bergstrom, P., Riedl, J.: Grouplens: an open architecture for collaborative filtering of netnews. In: Proceedings of the 1994 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW 1994, pp. 175–186. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (1994). https://doi.org/10.1145/192844.192905

  40. Rossetti, G., Milli, L., Rinzivillo, S., Sîrbu, A., Pedreschi, D., Giannotti, F.: Ndlib: a python library to model and analyze diffusion processes over complex networks. Inter. J. Data Sci. Anal. 5(1), 61–79 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Sarwar, B., Karypis, G., Konstan, J., Riedl, J.: Item-based collaborative filtering recommendation algorithms. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW 2001, pp. 285–295. Association for Computing Machinery (2001). https://doi.org/10.1145/371920.372071

  42. Shrivastava, G., Kumar, P., Ojha, R.P., Srivastava, P.K., Mohan, S., Srivastava, G.: Defensive modeling of fake news through online social networks. IEEE Trans. Comput. So. Syst. 7(5), 1159–1167 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSS.2020.3014135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Shu, K., Mahudeswaran, D., Wang, S., Lee, D., Liu, H.: Fakenewsnet: a data repository with news content, social context, and spatiotemporal information for studying fake news on social media. Big Data 8(3), 171–188 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Simpson, E., Conner, A.: Fighting coronavirus misinformation and disinformation. https://www.americanprogress.org/article/fighting-coronavirus-misinformation-disinformation/ (2023), (Accessed 13 October 2023)

  45. Spezzano, F., Shrestha, A., Fails, J.A., Stone, B.W.: That’s fake news! investigating how readers identify the reliability of news when provided title, image, source bias, and full articles. Proc. ACM Hum. Comput. Inter. J. 5(CSCW1, Article 109) (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Tambuscio, M., Ruffo, G., Flammini, A., Menczer, F.: Fact-checking effect on viral hoaxes: A model of misinformation spread in social networks. In: Proceedings of the 24th international conference on World Wide Web, pp. 977–982 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Tomlein, M., et al.: An audit of misinformation filter bubbles on youtube: bubble bursting and recent behavior changes. In: Fifteenth ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, pp. 1–11 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Wang, S., Xu, X., Zhang, X., Wang, Y., Song, W.: Veracity-aware and event-driven personalized news recommendation for fake news mitigation. In: Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2022, WWW 2022, pp. 3673–3684. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2022). https://doi.org/10.1145/3485447.3512263

  49. Yaqub, W., Kakhidze, O., Brockman, M.L., Memon, N., Patil, S.: Effects of credibility indicators on social media news sharing intent. In: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2020, pp. 1–14 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Zafarani, R., Abbasi, M.A., Liu, H.: Social media mining: an introduction. Cambridge University Press (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Zhang, H., Alim, M.A., Li, X., Thai, M.T., Nguyen, H.T.: Misinformation in online social networks: detect them all with a limited budget. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 34(3) (2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/2885494

  52. Zhou, X., Mulay, A., Ferrara, E., Zafarani, R.: Recovery: a multimodal repository for covid-19 news credibility research. In: Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management, pp. 3205–3212 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research has been supported by the National Science Foundation under Award no. 1943370.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesca Spezzano .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Pathak, R., Spezzano, F. (2024). An Empirical Analysis of Intervention Strategies’ Effectiveness for Countering Misinformation Amplification by Recommendation Algorithms. In: Goharian, N., et al. Advances in Information Retrieval. ECIR 2024. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14611. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-56066-8_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-56066-8_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-56065-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-56066-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics