[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Music Visualisation and Its Short-Term Effect on Appraisal Skills

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
HCI International 2023 – Late Breaking Papers (HCII 2023)

Abstract

Music psychologists have long been concerned with phenomena such as repetition and tonality – both the internal representations formed by exposure to these phenomena, and how these representations vary with expertise. A question arises of whether less expert listeners can gain proficiency in perceiving a particular phenomenon by being exposed to representations that are known to be employed by more expert listeners. The current paper addresses this question within the domain of music appraisal. Participants with varying levels of musical expertise interacted with visualizations of two excerpts from Beethoven’s symphonies. One visualization (ScoreViewer) showed the staff notation of the music, synchronized to an orchestral recording. The other (PatternViewer) also depicted the notes synchronized to the recording, as well as representations of the music’s repetitive and tonal structure. Participants’ appraisal skills were assessed via multiple-choice questions on instrumentation, dynamics, repetition, and tonality. Results indicated that interacting with the PatternViewer visualization led to a significant improvement in listeners’ appraisal of repetitive and tonal structure, compared to interacting with the ScoreViewer. The size of this effect was well predicted by amount of formal musical training, such that less expert listeners exhibited larger improvements than more expert listeners. While further work is required to determine whether the observed effects transfer beyond the pieces studied or into long-term learning, these findings for appraisal skills indicate that carefully chosen representations from models of expert behavior can, in turn, help less expert individuals to improve their understanding of musical phenomena.

M. Grachten and H. Frostel—Independent Machine Learning Consultant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.youtube.com/user/smalin/.

  2. 2.

    https://tomcollinsresearch.net/research/PatternViewer/.

  3. 3.

    Both were from recordings of the Royal Concertgebouw Orchestra. The first was conducted by David Zinman and the second by Iván Fischer.

  4. 4.

    Only one participant was at ceiling for repetitive/tonal questions in the ScoreViewer, and two other participants were at ceiling for repetitive/tonal questions in the PatternViewer, so these comparisons are not being confounded by ceiling effects.

References

  1. AQA: listening to and appraising music: past paper for GCSE music unit 1. AQA, Manchester, UK (2012). Accessed 13 Jan 2014. https://www.aqa.org.uk/

  2. Brady, T.F., Konkle, T., Alzarez, G.A.: Compression in visual working memory: using statistical regularities to form more efficient memory representations. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 138(4), 487–502 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brainmetrix: brain training, brain exercises, brain fitness games, brain metrix (2014). Accessed 1 Aug 2014. https://www.brainmetrix.com/

  4. Chabris, C.F.: Prelude or requiem for the Mozart effect? Nature 400, 826–827 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen, N.S., Hwang, G.J.: Transforming the classrooms: innovative digital game-based learning designs and applications. Education Tech. Research Dev. 62, 125–128 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Collins, T., Arzt, A., Flossmann, S., Widmer, G.: SIARCT-CFP: improving precision and the discovery of inexact musical patterns in point-set representations. In: Proceedings of the International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference, pp. 549–554. Curitiba, Brazil (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Collins, T., Meredith, D.: Maximal translational equivalence classes of musical patterns in point-set representations. In: Proceedings of Mathematics and Computation in Music, pp. 88–99. Montreal, Canada (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Collins, T., Tillmann, B., Barrett, F.S., Delbé, C.: A combined model of sensory and cognitive representations underlying tonal expectation: from audio signals to behavior. Psychol. Rev. 121(1), 33–65 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cook, N.: The perception of large-scale tonal closure. Music. Percept. 5(2), 197–205 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Deutsch, D.: The processing of structured and unstructured tonal sequences. Percept. Psychophys. 28, 381–389 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Deutsch, D., Feroe, J.: The internal representation of pitch sequences in tonal music. Psychol. Rev. 88(6), 503–522 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Edexcel: listening and appraising: past paper for GCSE music unit 3. Pearson Education Ltd., London, UK (2012). Accessed 13 Jan 2014. https://www.edexcel.com/

  13. Grachten, M., Gasser, M., Arzt, A., Widmer, G.: Automatic alignment of music performances with structural differences. In: Proceedings of the International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference, pp. 607–612. Curitiba, Brazil (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hmelo-Silver, C.E., Pfeffer, M.G.: Comparing expert and novice understanding of a complex system from the perspective of structures, behaviors, and functions. Cogn. Sci. 28, 127–138 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Katsiavalos, A., Collins, T., Battey, B.: An initial computational model for musical schemata theory. In: Proceedings of the International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference, pp. 166–172. Delft, The Netherlands (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kraus, N., Martin, M.: Biological impact of musical training in at-risk children. In: Proceedings of the American Psychological Association’s 122nd Annual Convention. APA, Washington, DC (2014). Accessed 8 Aug 2014. https://www.apa.org/news/press/releases/2014/08/musical-training.aspx

  17. Krumhansl, C.L.: Cognitive foundations of musical pitch. Oxford University Press (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Krumhansl, C.L., Kessler, E.J.: Tracing the dynamic changes in perceived tonal organization in a spatial representation of musical keys. Psychol. Rev. 89(4), 334–368 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Malinowski, S.A.: Time-line of the music animation machine (and related experiments) (1985). Accessed 23 May 2014. https://www.musanim.com/mam/mamhist.htm

  20. Newton, I.: Opticks. Dover (1952). (Original work published 1704)

    Google Scholar 

  21. OCR: listening: past paper for GCSE music unit 4. OCR, Coventry, UK (2012). Accessed 13 Jan 2014. https://www.ocr.org.uk/

  22. Owen, A.M., et al.: Putting brain training to the test. Nature 465(7299), 775–778 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Rauscher, F.H., Shaw, G.L., Ky, K.N.: Music and spatial task performance. Nature 365(64478), 611 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Saffran, J.R., Johnson, E.K., Aslin, R.N., Newport, E.L.: Statistical learning of tone sequences by human infants and adults. Cognition 1(70), 27–52 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sutcliffe, R., Hovy, E., Collins, T., Wan, S., Crawford, T., Root, D.L.: Searching for musical features using natural language queries: the C@merata evaluations at MediaEval. Lang. Resour. Eval. 53(1), 87–140 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Tillmann, B., Bharucha, J.J., Bigand, E.: Implicit learning of tonality: a self-organizing approach. Psychol. Rev. 4(107), 885–913 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. WJEC: appraising: past paper for GCSE music unit 3. WJEC CBAC Ltd, Cardiff, UK (2012). Accessed 13 Jan 2014. https://www.wjec.co.uk/

  28. Zhang, W., Luck, S.J.: Discrete fixed-resolution representations in visual working memory. Letters, Nature 453(7192), 233–235 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang, W., Luck, S.J.: The number and quality of representations in working memory. Psychol. Sci. 22(11), 1434–1441 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Gerhard Widmer’s work is supported by the European Research Council (ERC) under the EU’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme, grant agreement No. 101019375 (“Whither Music?”).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tom Collins .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Nikrang, A., Grachten, M., Gasser, M., Frostel, H., Widmer, G., Collins, T. (2023). Music Visualisation and Its Short-Term Effect on Appraisal Skills. In: Mori, H., Asahi, Y., Coman, A., Vasilache, S., Rauterberg, M. (eds) HCI International 2023 – Late Breaking Papers. HCII 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14056. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48044-7_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48044-7_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-48043-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-48044-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics