Abstract
This research was motivated by the need for detailed information about the spatial and contextualized distribution of occupational exposures, which can be used to improve the layout of the workspace. To achieve this goal, the study emphasizes the need for position-related information and contextualized data. To address these concerns, the study proposes the use of Indoor Positioning System (IPS) sensors that can be further developed to establish a set of metrics for measuring and evaluating occupational exposures. The proposed IPS-based sensor fusion framework, which combines various environmental parameters with position data, can provide valuable insights into the operator’s working environment. For this, we propose an indoor position-based comfort level indicator. By identifying areas of improvement, interventions can be implemented to enhance operator performance and overall health. The measurement unit installed on a manual material handling device in a real production environment and collected data using temperature, noise, and humidity sensors. The results demonstrated the applicability of the proposed comfort level indicator in a wire harness manufacturing setting, providing location-based information to enhance operator well-being. Overall, the proposed framework can be used as a tool to monitor the industrial environment, especially the well-being of shop floor operators.
References
Alatise, M.B., Hancke, G.P.: A review on challenges of autonomous mobile robot and sensor fusion methods. IEEE Access 8, 39830–39846 (2020)
Chau, N., et al.: Contributions of occupational hazards and human factors in occupational injuries and their associations with job, age and type of injuries in railway workers. Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health 80, 517–525 (2007)
Ganesh, G.A., Sinha, S.L., Verma, T.N., Dewangan, S.K.: Investigation of indoor environment quality and factors affecting human comfort: a critical review. Build. Environ. 204, 108146 (2021)
Kocakulak, M., Butun, I.: An overview of wireless sensor networks towards internet of things. In: 2017 IEEE 7th Annual Computing and Communication Workshop and Conference (CCWC), pp. 1–6. IEEE (2017)
Lynch, J.P., Loh, K.J.: A summary review of wireless sensors and sensor networks for structural health monitoring. Shock Vibr. Dig. 38(2), 91–130 (2006)
Ma, Z.: An investigation of indoor positioning systems and their applications. Ph.D. thesis, Queen Mary University of London (2018)
Navas-Reascos, G.E., Romero, D., Stahre, J., Caballero-Ruiz, A.: Wire harness assembly process supported by collaborative robots: literature review and call for R &D. Robotics 11(3), 65 (2022)
Romero, D., Stahre, J.: Towards the resilient operator 5.0: the future of work in smart resilient manufacturing systems. 54th CIRP Conf. Manuf. Syst. 104, 1089–1094 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2021.11.183
Rosca, I., Dascălu, L., Solomon, G.: Assessment of occupational noise exposure in tyre manufacturing. In: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. vol. 916, p. 012094. IOP Publishing (2020)
Ruppert, T., Jaskó, S., Holczinger, T., Abonyi, J.: Enabling technologies for operator 4.0: a survey. Appl. Sci. 8(9), 1650 (2018)
Stefaniak, A., Du Preez, S., Du Plessis, J.: Additive manufacturing for occupational hygiene: a comprehensive review of processes, emissions, & exposures. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health, Part B 24(5), 173–222 (2021)
Sun, S., Zheng, X., Gong, B., Paredes, J.G., Ordieres-Meré, J.: Healthy operator 4.0: a human cyber-physical system architecture for smart workplaces. Sensors 20(7), 2011 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/s20072011
Tubaishat, M., Madria, S.: Sensor networks: an overview. IEEE Potentials 22(2), 20–23 (2003)
VanderWeele, T.J., et al.: Current recommendations on the selection of measures for well-being. Prev. Med. 133, 106,004 (2020)
Vieira, M.A., Vieira, M., Louro, P., Mateus, L., Vieira, P.: Indoor positioning system using a WDM device based on a-SiC: H technology. J. Lumin. 191, 135–138 (2017)
Wijngaards, I., King, O.C., Burger, M.J., van Exel, J.: Worker well-being: What it is, and how it should be measured. Appl. Res. Qual. Life 17, 1–38 (2021)
Zhang, Y., Zhao, R.: Effect of local exposure on human responses. Build. Environ. 42(7), 2737–2745 (2007)
Zuidema, C., et al.: Mapping occupational hazards with a multi-sensor network in a heavy-vehicle manufacturing facility. Ann. Work Exposures Health 63(3), 280–293 (2019)
Acknowledgment
This work has been implemented by the TKP2021-NVA-10 project with the support provided by the Ministry of Culture and Innovation of Hungary from the National Research, Development and Innovation Fund, financed under the 2021 Thematic Excellence Programme funding scheme. Tamás Ruppert was supported by the ÚNKP-22-4 New National Excellence Program of the Ministry for Innovation and Technology.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing
About this paper
Cite this paper
Halász, G., Medvegy, T., Abonyi, J., Ruppert, T. (2023). Indoor Positioning-based Occupational Exposures Mapping and Operator Well-being Assessment in Manufacturing Environment. In: Alfnes, E., Romsdal, A., Strandhagen, J.O., von Cieminski, G., Romero, D. (eds) Advances in Production Management Systems. Production Management Systems for Responsible Manufacturing, Service, and Logistics Futures. APMS 2023. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 689. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43662-8_39
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43662-8_39
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-43661-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-43662-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)