Abstract
This paper proposes an indoor scene layout interactive assessment method based on augmented reality (AR) to solve the problems of lacking an intuitive and systematic assessment of indoor scene layout and inefficient human moving for layout readjustment. This paper evaluates the indoor layout from accessibility, ventilation, and illumination and proposes the home interactive evaluation system AR-IHES (Augmented Reality Based Interactive Home Evaluation System) to give evaluation opinions and layout adjustment methods. The accessibility is assessed by using an avatar free-roaming in the scene, ventilation by simulating the natural wind field with a particle system, and illumination by calculating the cumulative influence of each light source at each point of the room. Then, we project the layout into AR, and users wearing AR devices obtain rich evaluation opinions, and freely adjust the design through gestures. The experimental results show that the assessment method can provide real-time feedback of objective and scientific evaluation results and provide users with corresponding modification opinions, which solve both the problems of tricky indoor scene layout evaluation and inefficient adjustment.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kim, J., Hong, T., Jeong, J., et al.: An integrated psychological response score of the occupants based on their activities and the indoor environmental quality condition changes. Build. Environ. 123, 66–77 (2017)
Kim, J., Dear, R.D.: Workspace satisfaction: the privacy-communication trade-off in open-plan offices. J. Environ. Psychol. 36, 18–26 (2013)
Chiang, C.M., Lai, C.M., Chou, P.C., et al.: the study on the comprehensive indicators of indoor environment assessment for occupants health in Taiwan. Build. Environ. 37(4), 387–392 (2017)
Feng, Z., Yu, C.W., Cao, S.J.: Fast prediction for indoor environment: models assessment. Indoor Built Environ. 28(6), 1–5 (2019)
Zhao, K., Jiang, Z., Li, D., et al.: Outdoor environment assessment tool for existing neighbourhoods based on the multi-criteria decision-making method. Build. Environ. 209, 108687 (2021)
Ashdown, I., Eng, P.: The Kruithof curve: a pleasing solution (2015)
Kakitsuba, N.: Comfortable indoor lighting conditions for LEDlights evaluated from psychological and physiological responses. Appl. Ergon. 82, 102941 (2019)
Wargocki, P., Sundell, J., Bischof, W., et al.: Ventilation and health in non-industrial indoor environments: report from a European multidisciplinary scientific consensus meeting (EUROVEN). Indoor Air 12(2), 113–128 (2010)
Li, H., Zhu, Y., Qin, O., et al.: A study on the effects of thermal, luminous, and acoustic environments on indoor environmental comfort in offices. Build. Environ. 49, 304–309 (2012)
Hygge, S., Knez, I.: Effects of noise, heat and indoor lighting on cognitive performance and self-reported affect. J. Environ. Psychol. 21(3), 291–299 (2001)
Ching, F.D., Binggeli, C.: Interior Design Illustrated. Wiley, USA (2012)
Yu, L.F., Yeung, S.K., et al.: The Clutterpalette: an interactive tool for detailing indoor scenes. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 22, 1138–1148 (2016)
Savva, M., Chang, AX., Agrawala, M.: SceneSuggest: context-driven 3D scene design (2017)
Merrell, P., Eric, S., Zeyang, L., et al.: Interactive furniture layout using interior design guidelines. ACM Trans. Graph. 30(4), 1–10 (2011)
Zhang, S., Zhang, Y., Ma, Q., et al.: PLACE: proximity learning of articulation and contact in 3D environments (2020)
Zhao, W.: Rationality evaluation of art furniture layout based on scene simulation. In: International Conference on Virtual Reality and Intelligent Systems (2019)
Fu, Q., Fu, H., Yan, H., et al.: Human-centric metrics for indoor scene assessment and synthesis. Graph. Models 110, 101073 (2020)
Gao, Y., Ma, Y., Zhao, Z., et al.: Statistical analysis of the correlation between the contact area of human barefoot morphological characteristics and height and body mass. Chin. Tissue Eng. Res. 25(32), 6 (2021)
Liu, G.H., Sheng, D.: Comparison of formulas for calculating human surface area based on three-dimensional measurements. J. Anat. 5, 6 (2019)
Rahman, A., Mahmood, A.K.: Agent-based simulation using prometheus methodology in evacuation planning. In: International Symposium on Information Technology, vol. 3, pp. 1–8. IEEE (2008)
Gwynne, S., Galea, E.R., Owen, M.: A review of the methodologies used in the computer simulation of evacuation from the built environment. Build. Environ. 34(6), 741–749 (1999)
Pan, X., Han, C.S., Dauber, K., et al.: A multi-agent based framework for the simulation of human and social behaviors during emergency evacuations. Ai Soc. 22(2), 113–132 (2007)
Zhang, K., Ji, Y., Bo, J., et al.: Deep learning-based algorithm for indoor simple environment pathfinding. Internet Things Technol. 10(4), 5 (2020)
Hoyet, L., Spies, C., Plantard, P., et al.: Influence of motion speed on the perception of latency in avatar control. In: 2019 IEEE International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Virtual Reality (2019)
Zhang, S., Lv, M., Yang, C.: Real-time 3D route planning based on modified rapidly exploring random-tree algorithm. In: 2019 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Electronic Information and Communication Technology (ICEICT) (2019)
Fu, Z., Ding, M., Yu, X.: A study of pathfinding algorithms in game programming. J. Hunan Univ. Technol. 21(4), 4 (2007)
Liebmann, F., et al.: Pedicle screw navigation using surface digitization on the Microsoft HoloLens. Int. J. Comput. Assist. Radiol. Surg. 14(7), 1157–1165 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-019-01973-7
Vuletic, T.: Systematic literature review of hand gestures used in human computer interaction interfaces. Int. J. Hum. Comput Stud. 129, 74–94 (2019)
Yoon, L., Yang, D., Kim, J., et al.: Placement retargeting of virtual avatars to dissimilar indoor environments. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 28, 1619–1633 (2020)
Riedlinger, U., Oppermann, L., et al.: Tango vs. HoloLens: a comparison of collaborative indoor AR visualisations using hand-held and hands-free devices. Multimodal Technol. Interact. 3(2), 23 (2019)
Acknowledgements
This research was partially supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2020YFC1523302), National Nature Science Foundation of China (No. 61972041, No. 62072045), and Innovation & Transfer Fund of Peking University Third Hospital (No. BYSYZHKC2021110).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Chen, N., Lu, Z., Yu, X., Yang, L., Xu, P., Fan, Y. (2022). Augmented Reality-Based Home Interaction Layout and Evaluation. In: Magnenat-Thalmann, N., et al. Advances in Computer Graphics. CGI 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13443. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-23473-6_31
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-23473-6_31
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-23472-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-23473-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)