Product Innovation Through A3 Problem-Solving: Improving the Design of a Commercial Beverage Dispenser

1. Lee, H., Smith, K.G., Grimm, C.M.: The effect of new product radicality and scope on the extent and speed of innovation diffusion. J. Manag. 29(5), 753–768 (2003)

   Google Scholar 

2. Urabe, K.: Innovation and the Japanese management system. Innovation and management international comparisons. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin (1988)

   Google Scholar 

3. Kanagal, N.B.: Innovation and product innovation in marketing strategy (2015)

   Google Scholar 

4. Popadiuk, S., Choo, C.W.: Innovation and knowledge creation: how are these concepts related? Int. J. Inf. Manage. 26(4), 302–312 (2006)

   Article  Google Scholar 

5. Manseau, A.: Redefining innovation, in Building Tomorrow: Innovation in Construction and Engineering, pp. 43–55. Routledge, Abingdon (2019)

   Google Scholar 

6. Dorst, K.: The core of ‘design thinking’and its application. Des. Stud. 32(6), 521–532 (2011)

   Article  Google Scholar 

7. Li, M., et al.: An integrated TRIZ approach for technological process and product innovation. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part B: J. Eng. Manuf. 231(6), 1062–1077 (2017)

   Article  Google Scholar 

8. Hua, Z., et al.: Integration TRIZ with problem-solving tools: a literature review from 1995 to 2006. Int. J. Bus. Innov. Res. 1(1–2), 111–128 (2006)

   Article  Google Scholar 

9. Laursen, L.N., Haase, L.M.: The shortcomings of design thinking when compared to designerly thinking. Des. J. 22(6), 813–832 (2019)

   Google Scholar 

10. Johansson-Sköldberg, U., Woodilla, J., Çetinkaya, M.: Design thinking: past, present and possible futures. Creat. Innov. Manag. 22(2), 121–146 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

11. Da Silva, R.H., Kaminski, P.C., Armellini, F.: Improving new product development innovation effectiveness by using problem solving tools during the conceptual development phase: integrating Design Thinking and TRIZ. Creat. Innov. Manag. 29(4), 685–700 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

12. Thurnes, C.M., et al.: TRIZ events increase innovative strength of lean product development processes. In: Research and Practice on the Theory of Inventive Problem Solving (TRIZ), pp. 187–206. Springer (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31782-3_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

13. Mayda, M., Börklü, H.R.: An integration of TRIZ and the systematic approach of Pahl and Beitz for innovative conceptual design process. J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 36(4), 859–870 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-013-0106-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

14. Kim, J., Wilemon, D.: An empirical investigation of complexity and its management in new product development. Technol. Anal. Strate. Manag. 21(4), 547–564 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

15. Saad, N.M., et al.: A3 thinking approach to support problem solving in lean product and process development. In: Concurrent Engineering Approaches for Sustainable Product Development in a Multi-Disciplinary Environment, pp. 871–882. Springer (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4426-7_74

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

16. Sobek II, D.K., Jimmerson, C.: A3 reports: Tool for organizational transformation. In: IIE Annual Conference. Proceedings. Institute of Industrial and Systems Engineers (IISE) (2006)

    Google Scholar 

17. Bassuk, J.A., Washington, I.M.: The A3 problem solving report: a 10-step scientific method to execute performance improvements in an academic research vivarium. PLoS ONE 8(10), e76833 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

18. Atuahene-Gima, K., Wei, Y.: The vital role of problem-solving competence in new product success. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 28(1), 81–98 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

19. Barnett, B.D., Clark, K.B.: Problem solving in product development: a model for the advanced materials industries. Int. J. Technol. Manag. 15(8), 805–820 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

20. Sun, H., Zhao, Y.: The empirical relationship between quality management and the speed of new product development. Total Qual. Manag. 21(4), 351–361 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

21. Liker, J.K., Morgan, J.M.: The Toyota way in services: the case of lean product development. Acad. Manag. Perspect. 20(2), 5–20 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

22. Sobek II, D.K., Smalley, A.: Understanding A3 Thinking: a Critical Component of Toyota's PDCA Management System. Productivity Press (2008)

    Google Scholar 

23. Gidey, E., et al.: The plan-do-check-act cycle of value addition. Ind. Eng. Manag. 3(124), 2169–0316.1000124 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

24. Kholif, A.M., et al.: Implementation of model for improvement (PDCA-cycle) in dairy laboratories. J. Food Saf. 38(3), e12451 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

25. Hong, Y., et al.: Continuous improvement on the rationality of prophylactic injectable PPIs usage by a clinical pharmacist-led guidance team at a Chinese tertiary teaching hospital. J. Int. Med. Res. 48(10), 0300060520954729 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

26. Loyd, N., Gholston, S.: Implementation of a plan-do-check-act pedagogy in industrial engineering education. Int. J. Eng. Educ. 32(3), 1260–1267 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

27. Nguyen, V., et al.: Practical application of plan–do–check–act cycle for quality improvement of sustainable packaging: a case study. Appl. Sci. 10(18), 6332 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

28. Lodgaard, E., Aasland, K.E.: An examination of the application of plan-do-check-act cycle in product development. In: DS 68–10: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 11), Impacting Society through Engineering Design, vol. 10: Design Methods and Tools pt. 2, Lyngby/Copenhagen, Denmark, 15–19 August 2011 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

29. Bartezzaghi, E., Corso, M., Verganti, R.: Continuous improvement and inter-project learning in new product development. Int. J. Technol. Manag. 14(1), 116–138 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

30. Rasmussen, S., Fritsch, J., Hansen, N.B.: A design archival approach to knowledge production in design research and practice. In Proceedings of the 31st Australian Conference on Human-Computer-Interaction (2019)

    Google Scholar 

31. Mohd Saad, N., et al.: A3 thinking approach to support knowledge-driven design. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 68(5–8), 1371–1386 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-4928-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

32. Tortorella, G.L., Fries, C.E.: Application of focus groups and learning cycles on the A3 thinking methodology: the case of increasing machinery capacity at a steel plant. In: Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Operations Excellence and Service Engineering (2015)

    Google Scholar 

33. Shook, J.: Managing to learn: using the A3 management process to solve problems, gain agreement, mentor and lead. Lean Enterprise Institute (2008)

    Google Scholar 

34. Anderson, J.S., Morgan, J.N., Williams, S.K.: Using Toyota’s A3 thinking for analyzing MBA business cases. Decis. Sci. J. Innov. Educ. 9(2), 275–285 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

35. Flinchbaugh, J.: A3 problem solving: Applying lean thinking. Lean Learning Center, pp. 533–538 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

36. Alshahran, B., Al-Ashaab, A., Mclaughlin, P.: The initial study of problem-solving in customer services in the airlines’ sector. Int. J. Econ. Manag. Syst. 2 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

37. Lenort, R., et al.: A3 method as a powerful tool for searching and implementing green innovations in an industrial company transport. Procedia Eng. 192, 533–538 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

38. Rini, S.: Implementation of lean thinking through A3 report in plastic injection company. Int. J. Ind. Optim. 2(1), 63–68 (2021)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

39. Parrish, K., Tommelein, I.D., Ballard, G.: Use of A3 reports to focus design and construction conversations. In: Construction Research Congress 2009: Building a Sustainable Future (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references