[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Abstract

Gamification applied to education could impact positively (or negatively) students’ psychological and cognitive aspects, such as motivation, engagement and learning performance. Nevertheless, the perceptions of education professionals and their concerns about implicit biases and ethics that emerge from applying gamification to support learning has not been widely explored. Thus, we conducted a qualitative study that aims to identify gamification potential biases and ethical concerns, from teachers’ perspectives, in the Brazilian context. We designed a survey answered by 61 Brazilian teachers, who had not used gamification before - even thought they were aware of its potential benefits. Our results point out that social aspects, difficulties in planning and evaluation, psychological and behavioral impacts, and privacy of students are some of the main concerns related to ethics and biases. This paper contribution focused on providing a list of potential biases and ethical concerns to consider when designing and applying gamification in education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Holmes, W., et al.: Ethics of AI in education: towards a community-wide framework. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ., 1–23 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kim, T.W., Werbach, K.: More than just a game ethical issues in gamification. Ethics Inf. Technol. 18(2), 157–173 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Klock, A.C.T., Gasparini, I., Pimenta, M.S., Hamari, J.: Tailored gamification: a review of literature. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud., 102495 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJHCS.2020.102495

  4. Lazar, J., Feng, J.H., Hochheiser, H.: Research methods in human-computer interaction. Morgan Kaufmann, 2nd edn. (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Toda, A.M., Valle, P.H.D., Isotani, S.: The dark side of gamification: an overview of negative effects of gamification in education. In: Cristea, A.I., Bittencourt, I.I., Lima, F. (eds.) HEFA 2017. CCIS, vol. 832, pp. 143–156. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97934-2_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was partially funded by CNPq (141859/2019-9, 163932/2020-4, 308458/2020-6,308395/2020-4, and 308513/2020-7); CAPES (Code 001); FAPESP (2018/15917-0, 2013/07375-0), Samsung-UFAM (agreements 001/2020 and 003/2019). This work received financial support from the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel - CAPES - Brazil (PROAP/AUXPE).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Armando Toda .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Toda, A. et al. (2022). Gamification Through the Looking Glass - Perceived Biases and Ethical Concerns of Brazilian Teachers. In: Rodrigo, M.M., Matsuda, N., Cristea, A.I., Dimitrova, V. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education. Posters and Late Breaking Results, Workshops and Tutorials, Industry and Innovation Tracks, Practitioners’ and Doctoral Consortium. AIED 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13356. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11647-6_47

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11647-6_47

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-11646-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-11647-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics