Abstract
Timed data release refers to protecting sensitive data that can be accessed only after a pre-determined amount of time has passed. While blockchain-based solutions for timed data release provide a promising approach for decentralizing the process, designing a reliable and attack-resilient timed-release service that is resilient to malicious adversaries in a blockchain network is inherently challenging. A timed-release service on a blockchain network is inevitably exposed to the risk of post-facto attacks where adversaries may launch attacks after the data is released in the blockchain network. Existing incentive-based solutions for timed data release in Ethereum blockchains guarantee protection under the assumption of a fully rational adversarial environment in which every peer acts rationally. However, these schemes fail invariably when even a single participating peer node in the protocol starts acting maliciously and deviates from the rational behavior.
In this paper, we propose an attack-resilient and practical blockchain-based solution for timed data release in a mixed adversarial environment, where both malicious adversaries and rational adversaries exist. The proposed mechanism incorporates an effective decentralized reputation model to evaluate the behaviors of the peer in the network. Based on the reputation model, we design a suite of novel reputation-aware timed-release protocols that effectively handles the mixed adversarial environment consisting of both malicious adversaries and rational adversaries. We implement a prototype of the proposed approach using Smart Contracts and deploy it on the Ethereum official test network, Rinkeby. For extensively evaluating the proposed techniques at scale, we perform simulation experiments to validate the effectiveness of the reputation-aware timed data release protocols. The results demonstrate the effectiveness and strong attack resilience of the proposed mechanisms and incurs only a modest gas cost.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
In this paper, we use the terms peer and peer account interchangeably. We also highlight that a peer may represent an individual holding Ethereum account and not a miner node.
- 2.
We generalize D as any data transmitted over the Ethereum account network. In this paper, specifically, D refers to the secret key generated by the sender.
References
Infura. https://infura.io/
Interval tree. https://github.com/gnidan/interval-trees-solidity
Rinkeby. https://www.rinkeby.io/#stats
Bitansky, N., Goldwasser, S., Jain, A., Paneth, O., Vaikuntanathan, V., Waters, B.: Time-lock puzzles from randomized encodings. In: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science, pp. 345–356 (2016)
Boneh, D., Naor, M.: Timed commitments. In: Bellare, M. (ed.) CRYPTO 2000. LNCS, vol. 1880, pp. 236–254. Springer, Heidelberg (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44598-6_15
Josang, A., Ismail, R.: The beta reputation system. In: Proceedings of the 15th Bled Electronic Commerce Conference, vol. 5, pp. 2502–2511 (2002)
Kasamatsu, K., Matsuda, T., Emura, K., Attrapadung, N., Hanaoka, G., Imai, H.: Time-specific encryption from forward-secure encryption. In: Visconti, I., De Prisco, R. (eds.) SCN 2012. LNCS, vol. 7485, pp. 184–204. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32928-9_11
Kikuchi, R., Fujioka, A., Okamoto, Y., Saito, T.: Strong security notions for timed-release public-key encryption revisited. In: Kim, H. (ed.) ICISC 2011. LNCS, vol. 7259, pp. 88–108. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31912-9_7
Li, C., Palanisamy, B.: Emerge: self-emerging data release using cloud data storage. In: 2017 IEEE 10th International Conference on Cloud Computing (CLOUD), pp. 26–33. IEEE (2017)
Li, C., Palanisamy, B.: Timed-release of self-emerging data using distributed hash tables. In: 2017 IEEE 37th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS), pp. 2344–2351. IEEE (2017)
Li, C., Palanisamy, B.: Decentralized privacy-preserving timed execution in blockchain-based smart contract platforms. In: 2018 IEEE 25th International Conference on High Performance Computing (HiPC), pp. 265–274. IEEE (2018)
Li, C., Palanisamy, B.: Decentralized release of self-emerging data using smart contracts. In: 2018 IEEE 37th Symposium on Reliable Distributed Systems (SRDS), pp. 213–220. IEEE (2018)
Li, C., Palanisamy, B.: SilentDelivery: practical timed-delivery of private information using smart contracts. IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. (to appear)
Li, M., et al.: CrowdBC: a blockchain-based decentralized framework for crowdsourcing. IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst. 30(6), 1251–1266 (2018)
May, T.C.: Timed-release crypto (1993). http://www.hks.net/cpunks/cpunks-0/1460.html
Nash, J.F., Jr.: Equilibrium points in n-person games. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 36(1), 48–49 (1950)
Ning, J., Dang, H., Hou, R., Chang, E.-C.: Keeping time-release secrets through smart contracts. IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive, p. 1166 (2018)
Palanisamy, B., Li, C.: Self-emerging data infrastructures. In: 2019 IEEE 5th International Conference on Collaboration and Internet Computing (CIC), pp. 256–265 (2019)
Reed, M.G., Syverson, P.F., Goldschlag, D.M.: Anonymous connections and onion routing. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 16(4), 482–494 (1998)
Rivest, R.L., Shamir, A., Wagner, D.A.: Time-lock puzzles and timed-release crypto
Sun, Y., Xue, R., Zhang, R., Qianqian, S., Gao, S.: RTChain: a reputation system with transaction and consensus incentives for e-commerce blockchain. ACM Trans. Internet Technol. (TOIT) 21(1), 1–24 (2020)
Wang, J., Palanisamy, B.: Protecting blockchain-based decentralized timed release of data from malicious adversaries. In: 2022 IEEE International Conference on Blockchain and Cryptocurrency (2022)
Jiangshan, Yu., Kozhaya, D., Decouchant, J., Esteves-Verissimo, P.: RepuCoin: your reputation is your power. IEEE Trans. Comput. 68(8), 1225–1237 (2019)
Zhou, H., Ouyang, X., Ren, Z., Su, J., de Laat, C., Zhao, Z.: A blockchain based witness model for trustworthy cloud service level agreement enforcement. In: IEEE INFOCOM 2019-IEEE Conference on Computer Communications, pp. 1567–1575. IEEE (2019)
Acknowledgement
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant #2020071. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing
About this paper
Cite this paper
Wang, J., Palanisamy, B. (2022). Attack-Resilient Blockchain-Based Decentralized Timed Data Release. In: Sural, S., Lu, H. (eds) Data and Applications Security and Privacy XXXVI. DBSec 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13383. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10684-2_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10684-2_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-10683-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-10684-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)
