[go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

‘Caution – Principle Under Construction’ a Visual Inquiry Tool for Developing Design Principles

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
The Next Wave of Sociotechnical Design (DESRIST 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 12807))

Abstract

Researchers and practitioners often face challenges in structuring larger design projects and, therefore, struggle to capture, discuss, and reflect on essential components that should be considered. These first steps are, however, of great importance because decisions such as in terms of selecting an underpinning (kernel) theory, following certain development approaches, or specifying knowledge sources impact the resulting design solution. To provide a frame for developing one of the dominant forms of prescriptive knowledge in information systems (IS), we present the ‘Principle Constructor’ that seeks to support the iterative endeavor of formulating design principles. This so-called visual inquiry tool is grounded in previous research on design knowledge and an empirical analysis of IS articles that present principles, built according to available guidance for this class of tools, and evaluated through several workshops. Doing this, we provide an underlying structure with building blocks for creating design principles and complement research on their anatomy and development procedures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. van Aken, J.E.: Management research as a design science: articulating the research products of mode 2 knowledge production in management. Br. J. Manag. 16, 19–36 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Vom Brocke, J., Winter, R., Hevner, A., Maedche, A.: Accumulation and evolution of design knowledge in design science research - a journey through time and space. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 21, 520–544 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Legner, C., Pentek, T., Otto, B.: Accumulating design knowledge with reference models: insights from 12 years’ research into data management. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 21, 735–770 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Niiniluoto, I.: The aim and structure of applied research. Erkenntnis 38, 1–21 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chandra Kruse, L., Seidel, S.: Tensions in design principle formulation and reuse. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gregor, S., Hevner, A.R.: Positioning and presenting design science research for maximum impact. MIS Quart. Manag. Inform. Syst. 37, 337–355 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chandra Kruse, L., Seidel, S., Purao, S.: Making use of design principles. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology, pp. 37–51 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sein, M.K., Henfridsson, O., Purao, S., Rossi, M., Lindgren, R.: Action design research. MIS Quart. Manag. Inform. Syst. 35, 37–56 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Baiyere, A., Hevner, A., Gregor, S., Rossi, M., Baskerville, R.: Artifact and/or theory? Publishing design science research in IS. In: Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Information Systems (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Iivari, J.: Towards information systems as a science of meta-artifacts. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 12, 568–581 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chandra Kruse, L., Nickerson, J.: Portraying design essence. In: Proceedings of the 51st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 4433–4442 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Avdiji, H., Elikan, D.A., Missonier, S., Pigneur, Y.: A design theory for visual inquiry tools. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 21, 695–734 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Möller, F., Guggenberger, T., Otto, B.: Towards a method for design principle development in information systems. In: Hofmann, S., Müller, O., Rossi, M. (eds.) DESRIST 2020. LNCS, vol. 12388, pp. 208–220. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64823-7_20

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Kuechler, W., Vaishnavi, V.: A framework for theory development in design science research: multiple perspectives. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 13, 395–423 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J., Ram, S.: Design science in information systems research. MIS Quart. Manag. Inf. Syst. 28, 75–105 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Iivari, J., Hansen, M.R.P., Haj-Bolouri, A.: A framework for light reusability evaluation of design principles in design science research. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Chandra Kruse, L., Seidel, S., Gregor, S.: Prescriptive knowledge in IS research: conceptualizing design principles in terms of materiality, action, and boundary conditions. In: Proceedings of the 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gregor, S.: The nature of theory in information systems. MIS Quart. Manag. Inf. Syst. 30, 611–642 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bunge, M.: Scientific Research II: The Search for Truth. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48138-3

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Gregor, S., Chandra Kruse, L., Seidel, S.: The anatomy of a design principle. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 21, 1622–1652 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Walls, J.G., Widmeyer, R.G., Sawy, O.A.: Building an information system design theory for vigilant EIS. Inf. Syst. Res. 3, 36–59 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Heinrich, P., Schwabe, G.: Communicating nascent design theories on innovative information systems through multi-grounded design principles. In: Tremblay, M.C., VanderMeer, D., Rothenberger, M., Gupta, A., Yoon, V. (eds.) DESRIST 2014. LNCS, vol. 8463, pp. 148–163. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06701-8_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Koppenhagen, N., Gaß, O., Müller, B.: Design science research in action - anatomy of success critical activities for rigor and relevance. In: Proceedings of the 20th European Conference on Information Systems, pp. 1–12 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Cronholm, S., Göbel, H.: Guidelines supporting the formulation of design principles. In: Proceedings of the 29th Australasian Conference on Information Systems (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Schoormann, T., Behrens, D., Fellmann, M., Knackstedt, R.: On your mark, ready, search: a framework for structuring literature search strategies in information systems. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Webster, J., Watson, R.T.: Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: writing a literature review. MIS Quart. Manag. Inf. Syst. 26, xiii–xxiii (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Cooper, H.M.: Organizing knowledge syntheses: a taxonomy of literature reviews. Knowl. Soc. 1, 104–126 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Randolph, J.J.: A guide to writing the dissertation literature review. Pract. Assess. Res. Eval. 14, 1–13 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Tremblay, M., Hevner, A., Berndt, D.: Focus groups for artifact refinement and evaluation in design research. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 26, 599–618 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Niederman, F., March, S.: The “Theoretical lens” concept: we all know what it means, but do we all know the same thing? Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 44, 1–33 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hönigsberg, S.: A platform for value co-creation in SME networks. In: Hofmann, S., Müller, O., Rossi, M. (eds.) DESRIST 2020. LNCS, vol. 12388, pp. 285–296. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64823-7_26

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  32. Schoormann, T., Behrens, D., Knackstedt, R.: The noblest way to learn wisdom is by reflection: designing software tools for reflecting sustainability in business models. In: Proceedings of the 39th International Conference on Information Systems (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Wiethof, C., Tavanapour, N., Bittner, E.: Design and evaluation of a collaborative writing process with gamification elements. In: Proceedings of the 28th European Conference on Information Systems (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kolkowska, E., Karlsson, F., Hedström, K.: Towards analysing the rationale of information security non-compliance: devising a value-based compliance analysis method. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 26, 39–57 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Babaian, T., Lucas, W., Xu, J., Topi, H.: Usability through system-user collaboration. In: Winter, R., Zhao, J.L., Aier, S. (eds.) DESRIST 2010. LNCS, vol. 6105, pp. 394–409. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13335-0_27

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  36. Parsons, J., Wand, Y.: Extending principles of classification from information modeling to other disciplines. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 14, 245–173 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Feine, J., Morana, S., Maedche, A.: Designing a chatbot social cue configuration system. In: Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Information Systems (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Wambsganss, T., Rietsche, R.: Towards designing an adaptive argumentation learning tool. In: Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Information Systems (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Chanson, M., Bogner, A., Bilgeri, D., Fleisch, E., Wortmann, F.: Blockchain for the IoT: privacy-preserving protection of sensor data. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 20, 1274–1309 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Meier, P., Beinke, J.H., Fitte, C., Behne, A., Teuteberg, F.: FeelFit–design and evaluation of a conversational agent to enhance health awareness. In: Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Information Systems (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Iivari, J.: Distinguishing and contrasting two strategies for design science research. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 24, 107–115 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Pan, S.L., Li, M., Pee, L.G., Sandeep, M.S.: Sustainability design principles for a wildlife management analytics system: an action design research. Eur. J. Inf. Syst., 1–22 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Herterich, M.M.: On the design of digitized industrial products as key resources of service platforms for industrial service innovation. In: Maedche, A., vom Brocke, J., Hevner, A. (eds.) DESRIST 2017. LNCS, vol. 10243, pp. 364–380. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59144-5_22

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  44. Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M.A., Chatterjee, S.: A design science research methodology for information systems research. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 24, 45–77 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Kuechler, B., Vaishnavi, V.: On theory development in design science research: anatomy of a research project. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 17, 489–504 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Horlach, B., Schirmer, I., Drews, P.: Agile portfolio management: design goals and principles. In: Proceedings of the 27th European Conference on Information Systems (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Nguyen, A., Tuunanen, T., Gardner, L., Sheridan, D.: Design principles for learning analytics information systems in higher education. Eur. J. Inf. Syst., 1–28 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Gregor, S., Jones, D.: The anatomy of a design theory. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 8, 312–335 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Morana, S., et al.: Research prototype: the design canvas in mydesignprocess. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  50. vom Brocke, J., Maedche, A.: The DSR grid: six core dimensions for effectively planning and communicating design science research projects. Electron. Mark. 29(3), 379–385 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-019-00358-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Morana, S., et al.: Tool support for design science research-towards a software ecosystem: a report from a DESRIST 2017 workshop. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Sys. 43, 237–256 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany

    Frederik Möller & Boris Otto

  2. Fraunhofer ISST, 44227, Dortmund, Germany

    Frederik Möller & Boris Otto

  3. University of Hildesheim, 31141, Hildesheim, Germany

    Thorsten Schoormann

Authors
  1. Frederik Möller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Thorsten Schoormann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Boris Otto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frederik Möller .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Liechtenstein, Vaduz, Liechtenstein

    Leona Chandra Kruse

  2. University of Liechtenstein, Vaduz, Liechtenstein

    Stefan Seidel

  3. University of Agder, Kristiansand, Norway

    Geir Inge Hausvik

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Möller, F., Schoormann, T., Otto, B. (2021). ‘Caution – Principle Under Construction’ a Visual Inquiry Tool for Developing Design Principles. In: Chandra Kruse, L., Seidel, S., Hausvik, G.I. (eds) The Next Wave of Sociotechnical Design. DESRIST 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12807. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82405-1_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82405-1_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-82404-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-82405-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation