Abstract
In light of the increasing computerization of the world, the innovation activity in the industrial context seems to be lacking of tools to improve its performance. Since 2004, the 5.4 working group has been devoted to studying the computerization of this activity in industrial environments, coming up against, throughout its history, the underlying complexity of tackling a theme that is eminently complex because it is multidisciplinary and often in competition with human creative reasoning. However, the rebirth of artificial intelligence and the 4.0 paradigm are now pushing us to reconsider our research axes, as well as the scope of action in which our research must be situated. This article proposes an analysis that aims to refocus our research around a more realistic topic, more in tune with today’s world, in line with our understanding of the issues in which our contribution can be deployed and on which scientific foundations.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cao, Q., Giustozzi, F., Zanni-Merk, C., de Bertrand de Beuvron, F., Reich, C.: Smart condition monitoring for Industry 4.0 manufacturing processes: an ontology based approach. Cybern. Syst. 50(2), 82–96 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/01969722.2019.1565118
Cao, Q., Zanni-Merk, C., Samet, A., de Bertrand de Beuvron, F., Reich, C.: Using rule quality measures for rule base refinement in knowledge-based predictive maintenance systems. Cybern. Syst. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/01969722.2019.1705550
Cavallucci, D.: A research agenda for computing developments associated with innovation pipelines. Comput. Industry 62(4), 377–383 (2011)
Cavallucci, D., Oget, D.: On the efficiency of teaching TRIZ: experiences in a French engineering school. Int. J. Eng. Educ. 29(2) 304–317 (2013)
Chibane, H., Dubois, S., De Guio, R.: Automatic extraction and ranking of systems of contradictions out of a design of experiments. In: Cavallucci, D., De Guio, R., Koziołek, S. (eds.) TFC 2018. IAICT, vol. 541, pp. 276–289. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02456-7_23
Dubois, S., Chibane, H., De Guio, R., et al.: From simulation to contradictions, different ways to formulate innovation directions. In: ETRIA TRIZ Future Conference 2017, Lappeenranta, Finland (2017)
Houssin, R., Renaud, J., Coulibaly, A.: TRIZ theory and case based reasoning: synergies and oppositions. Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. IJIDEM 9(3), 177–183 (2015)
Liu, W., Tan, R., Cao, G., Zhang, Z., Huang, S., Liu, L.: A proposed radicality evaluation method for design ideas at conceptual design stage. Comput. Ind. Eng. 132, 141–152 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.04.027
Liu, W., Tan, R., Cao, G., Yu, F., Li, H.: Creative design through knowledge clustering and case-based reasoning. Eng. Comput. 36(2), 527–541 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-019-00712-5
Liu, L., Li, Y., Xiong, Y., Cavallucci, D.: A new function-based patent knowledge retrieval tool for conceptual design of innovative products. Comput. Ind. 115, 103154 (2020)
Hanifi, M., Chibane, H., Houssin, R., Cavallucci, D.: A method to formulate problem in initial analysis of inventive design. In: Nyffenegger, F., Ríos, J., Rivest, L., Bouras, A. (eds.) PLM 2020. IAICT, vol. 594, pp. 311–323. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62807-9_25
Renjith, S.C., Park, K., Okudan Kremer, G.E.: A design framework for additive manufacturing: integration of additive manufacturing capabilities in the early design process. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 21(2), 329–345 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-019-00253-3
Russo, D., Peri, P., Spreafico, C.: TRIZ applied to waste pyrolysis project in morocco. In: Benmoussa, R., De Guio, R., Dubois, S., Koziołek, S. (eds.) TFC 2019. IAICT, vol. 572, pp. 295–304. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32497-1_24
Russo, D., Spreafico, C.: TRIZ-based guidelines for eco-improvement. Sustainability 12(8), 3412 (2020)
Silva, C., de Oliveira, F., Giustozzi, C.-M., Sanin, C., Szczerbicki, E.: Stream reasoning to improve decision-making in cognitive systems. Cybern. Syst. 51(2), 214–231 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/01969722.2019.1705553
Wang, Y., Peng, Q., Tan, R., Sun, J.: Implementation of low-end disruptive innovation based on OTSM-TRIZ. Comput. Aided Des. Appl. 17, 993–1006 (2020). https://doi.org/10.14733/cadaps.2020.993-1006
Zanni-Merk, C., Szczerbicki, E.: Building collective intelligence through experience: a survey on the use of the KREM model. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. vol. Pre-press, pp. 1–13, 11 July 2019. Pre-press
Zhang, P., Essaid, A., Zanni-Merk, C., Cavallucci, D., Ghabri, S.: Experience capitalization to support decision making in inventive problem solving, Comput. Ind. 101, 25–40 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2018.06.001
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cavallucci, D., Zanni-Merk, C. (2021). Computing Inventive Activities in an Industrial Context New Scientific Challenges and Orientations. In: Goedicke, M., Neuhold, E., Rannenberg, K. (eds) Advancing Research in Information and Communication Technology. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology(), vol 600. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81701-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81701-5_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-81700-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-81701-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)
