A Review of Distributed VR Co-design Systems

1. Adwernat, S., Wolf, M., Gerhard, D.: Optimizing the design review process for cyber-physical systems using virtual reality. Procedia CIRP 91 (2020)

   Google Scholar 

2. Banerjee, P., Basu-Mallick, D.: Measuring the effectiveness of presence and immersive tendencies on the conceptual design review process. J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng. 3(2) (2003). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1578500

3. Banerjee, P., Bochenek, G., Ragusa, J.: Analyzing the relationship of presence and immersive tendencies on the conceptual design review process. J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng. 2(1), 59–64 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1486218

   Article  Google Scholar 

4. de Casenave, L., Lugo, J.E.: Effects of immersion on virtual reality prototype design reviews of mechanical assemblies. In: 30th International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology, vol. 7, pp. 1–11 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2018-85542

5. Conner, B., et al.: An immersive tool for wide-area collaborative design. In: TeamCAD, the First Graphics Visualization, and Usability (GVU) Workshop on Collaborative design Atlanta, GA: TeamCAD, pp. 139–143 (1997)

   Google Scholar 

6. Cruz-Neira, C., Sandin, D.J., DeFanti, T.A., Kenyon, R.V., Hart, J.C.: The CAVE: audio visual experience automatic virtual environment. Commun. ACM 35(6), 64–72 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1145/129888.129892

   Article  Google Scholar 

7. Dorta, T., Kinayoglu, G.: Towards a new representational ecosystem for the design studio. In: 19th International Conference on Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia (CAADRIA), pp. 699–708 (2014)

   Google Scholar 

8. Dorta, T., Kinayoglu, G., Boudhraâ, S.: A new representational ecosystem for design teaching in the studio. Des. Stud. 47 (2016)

   Google Scholar 

9. Dorta, T., Kinayoglu, G., Hoffmann, M.: Hyve-3D and the 3D cursor: Architectural co-design with freedom in virtual reality. Int. J. Archit. Comput. 14(2), 87–102 (2016)

   Google Scholar 

10. Dorta, T., Safin, S., Boudhraâ, S., Marchand, E.B.: Co-designing in social VR. process awareness and suitable representations to empower user participation. In: Intelligent & Informed 24th Annual Conference of the Association for Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia (CAADRIA), vol. 2, pp. 141–150 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

11. Dunston, P.S., Arns, L.L., Mcglothlin, J.D., Lasker, G.C., Kushner, A.G.: An immersive virtual reality mock-up for design review of hospital patient rooms. In: Wang, X., Tsai, J.J.H. (eds.) Collaborative Design in Virtual Environments, pp. 167–176. Springer, Dordrecht (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0605-7_15

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

12. Freeman, I., Salmon, J., Coburn, J.: A bi-directional interface for improved interaction with engineering models in virtual reality design reviews. Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. (IJIDeM) 12(2) (2018)

    Google Scholar 

13. Freeman, I.J., Salmon, J.L., Coburn, J.Q.: CAD integration in virtual reality design reviews for improved engineering model interaction. In: Proceedings of the ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. vol. 11, pp. 1–10. American Society of Mechanical Engineers (2016). https://doi.org/10.1115/imece2016-66948

14. Fussell, S.R., Setlock, L.D., Yang, J., Ou, J., Mauer, E., Kramer, A.D.I.: Gestures over video streams to support remote collaboration on physical tasks. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 19(3) (2004)

    Google Scholar 

15. Ghadban, W., Kozina, V., Kelly, B.: Improving project delivery using virtual reality in design reviews - a case study. In: Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition & Conference, pp. 1–8. Society of Petroleum Engineers (2019). https://doi.org/10.2118/197745-ms

16. Girbacia, F., Butnaru, T., Beraru, A., Butila, E., Mogan, G.: A framework for tele-immersive design review of 3D CAD models. Recent Res. Manuf. Eng. 199–202 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

17. Goh, K.K.: Ship design review and collaboration with virtual reality tools. Marine Eng. 54(5) (2019). https://doi.org/10.5988/jime.54.735

18. Gross, M., et al.: Blue-c: A spatially immersive display and 3D video portal for telepresence. ACM Trans. Graph. 22(3) (2003). https://doi.org/10.1145/882262.882350

19. Guyatt, G.H., Oxman, A.D., Kunz, R., Vist, G.E., Falck-Ytter, Y., Schünemann, H.J.: What is “quality of evidence”and why is it important to clinicians? BMJ 336(7651) (2008). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39490.551019.BE

20. Guyatt, G.H., et al.: GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 336(7650) (2008). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.AD

21. Haahr, M.T., Svidt, K., Jensen, R.L.: How can virtual reality and augmented reality support the design review of building services. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Construction Applications of Virtual Reality, pp. 84–93 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

22. Horvat, N., Škec, S., Martinec, T., Lukačević, F., Perišić, M.: Identifying the effect of reviewers’ expertise on design review using virtual reality and desktop interface. In: Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference, vol. 1, pp. 187–196. Cambridge University Press (2020)

    Google Scholar 

23. Kim, J.: Survey Results. In: What Do Design Reviewers Really Do? Understanding Roles Played by Design Reviewers in Daily Practice, pp. 95–121. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05642-1_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

24. Kulkarni, A., Kapoor, A., Iyer, M., Kosse, V.: Virtual prototyping used as validation tool in automotive design. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Congress on Modelling and Simulation, pp. 419–425 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

25. LaViola, J.J., Kruijff, E., McMahan, R., Bowman, D.A., Poupyrev, I.: 3D User Interfaces: Theory and Practice, 2nd edn. Addison Wesley Professional, USA (2017)

    Google Scholar 

26. Liu, Y., Castronovo, F., Messner, J., Leicht, R.: Evaluating the impact of virtual reality on design review meetings. J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 34(1), 1–13 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

27. Lukačević, F., Škec, S., Törlind, P., Štorga, M.: Identifying subassemblies and understanding their functions during a design review in immersive and non-immersive virtual environments. Front. Eng. Manage. (2020)

    Google Scholar 

28. Majumdar, T., Fischer, M.A., Schwegler, B.R.: Conceptual design review with a virtual reality mock-up model. In: Joint International Conference on Computing and Decision Making in Civil and Building Engineering, pp. 2902–2911 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

29. Moreau, G., Fuchs, P.: Stereoscopic displays for virtual reality in the car manufacturing industry: application to design review and ergonomic studies. In: Stereoscopic Displays and Virtual Reality Systems IX. vol. 4660, pp. 504–513. International Society for Optics and Photonics (2002)

    Google Scholar 

30. Oksman, V., Siltanen, S., Ainasoja, M.: User participation in co-creative services: developing virtual and augmented reality tools for do-it-yourself home design. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Academic MindTrek Conference, pp. 229–230 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

31. Paes, D., Irizarry, J.: A usability study of an immersive virtual reality platform for building design review: Considerations on human factors and user interface. In: Construction Research Congress, pp. 419–428 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

32. Parnas, D.L., Weiss, D.M.: Active design reviews: Principles and practices. J. Syst. Software 7(4) (1987). https://doi.org/10.1016/0164-1212(87)90025-2

33. Santos, P., Gierlinger, T., Stork, A., McIntyre, D.: Display and rendering technologies for virtual and mixed reality design review. In: 7th International Conference on Construction Applications of Virtual Reality, pp. 165–175 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

34. Steger, W., Kim, T.S., Gebert, M., Stelzer, R.: Improved user experience in a VR based design review. In: International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, vol. 1B. American Society of Mechanical Engineers (2016). https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2016-59840

35. Torres-Carrión, P.V., González-González, C.S., Aciar, S., Rodríguez-Morales, G.: Methodology for systematic literature review applied to engineering and education. In: 2018 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), pp. 1364–1373. IEEE (2018)

    Google Scholar 

36. Ventura, M.S., Castronovo, F., Nikolić, D., Ciribini, A.L.: A framework of procedural considerations for implementing virtual reality in design reviews. In: Proceedings of the 2019 European Conference on Computing in Construction, pp. 442–451 (2019). https://doi.org/10.35490/EC3.2019.160

37. Ventura, S.M., Castronovo, F., Ciribini, A.L.: A design review session protocol for the implementation of immersive virtual reality in usability-focused analysis. J. Inform. Technol. Construction (ITcon) 25(14) (2020)

    Google Scholar 

38. Wolfartsberger, J.: Analyzing the potential of virtual reality for engineering design review. Autom. Constr. 104, 27–37 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

39. Zaker, R., Coloma, E.: Virtual reality-integrated workflow in BIM-enabled projects collaboration and design review: a case study. Visual. Eng. 6(1), 1–15 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40327-018-0065-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references