[go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Intuitionistic-Bayesian Semantics of First-Order Logic for Generics

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Logic and Argumentation (CLAR 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 12061))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 497 Accesses

Abstract

Generics are used frequently in various natural languages. Cohen’s theory (1999) is one of the most promising theories of generics. Cohen proposes a probabilistic account of generics. Leslie (2007, 2008) points out the three shortcomings of Cohen’s theory. Asher and Pelletier (2013) point out five more shortcomings of Cohen’s theory. The aim of this paper is to propose a new version of logic for generics—First-Order Logic for Generics (\(\mathsf {FLG}\))—that can overcome all of the eight shortcomings. To accomplish this goal, we provide the language of \(\mathsf {FLG}\) with an intuitionistic-Bayesian semantics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    For nonstandard probability theory, consult [14]. For the relation between epistemic modals and nonstandard probability theory, refer to [18].

  2. 2.

    For the strong soundness and completeness of intuitionistic first-order logic with respect to \(\mathbf {P}_I\), consult [12] and [13].

  3. 3.

    For the strong soundness and completeness of superintuitionistic first-order logics with respect to \(\mathbf {P}_{S(\varPhi _1\wedge \ldots \wedge \varPhi _n)}\), consult [13].

  4. 4.

    For the strong soundness and completeness with respect to \(\mathbf {P}_C\), consult [7] and [13].

  5. 5.

    The arguments on triviality results originate in [10] and [11].

  6. 6.

    Weatherson provides four arguments for intuitionistic Bayesianism. However, these four arguments can be reduced to the following three arguments.

  7. 7.

    For nonstandard probability theory, consult [14]. For the relation between epistemic modals and nonstandard probability theory, refer to [18].

References

  1. Asher, N., Pelletier, F.J.: More truths about generic truth. In: Mari, A., et al. (eds.) Genericity, pp. 312–333. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cohen, A.: Generics, frequency adverbs, and probability. Linguist. Philos. 22, 221–253 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Field, H.H.: Logic, meaning, and conceptual role. J. Philos. 74, 379–409 (1977)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Harman, G.: Meaning and semantics. In: Munitz, M.K., Unger, P.K. (eds.) Semantics and Philosophy, pp. 1–16. New York University Press, New York (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Higginbotham, J.: Linguistic theory and Davidson’s program. In: LePore, E. (ed.) Truth and Interpretation: Perspectives on the Philosophy of Donald Davidson, pp. 29–48. Blackwell, Oxford (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Larson, R.K., Ludlow, P.: Interpreted logical forms. Synthese 95, 305–355 (1993)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Leblanc, H.: Probabilistic semantics for first-order logic. Math. Logic Q. 25, 497–509 (1979)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Leslie, S.J.: Generics and the structure of the mind. Philos. Perspect. 21, 375–403 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Leslie, S.J.: Generics and the structure of the mind. Philos. Rev. 117, 1–47 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lewis, D.: Probabilities of conditionals and conditional probabilities. Philos. Rev. 85, 297–315 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lewis, D.: Probabilities of conditionals and conditional probabilities II. Philos. Rev. 95, 581–589 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mogan, C.G., Leblanc, H.: Probabilistic semantics for intuitionistic logic. Notre Dame J. Formal Logic 24, 161–180 (1983)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Mogan, C.G., Mares, E.D.: Conditionals, probability, and non-triviality. J. Philos. Logic 24, 455–467 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01052599

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Narens, L.: Theories of Probability. World Scientific, Singapore (2007)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Ramsey, F.P.: General propositions and causality. In: Mellor, D.H. (ed.) F. P. Ramsey: Philosophical Papers, pp. 145–163. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1990). Completed in 1929

    Google Scholar 

  16. Segal, G.: A preference for sense and reference. J. Philos. 86, 73–89 (1989)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Stalnaker, R.C.: Probability and conditionals. Philos. Sci. 37, 64–80 (1970)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Suzuki, S.: Epistemic modals, qualitative probability, and nonstandard probability. In: Aloni, M., et al. (eds.) Proceedings of the 19th Amsterdam Colloquium (AC 2013), pp. 211–218 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Szabó, Z.G.: Compositionality. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Weatherson, B.: From classical to intuitionistic probability. Notre Dame J. Formal Logic 44, 111–123 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank three anonymous reviewers of CLAR 2020 for their very helpful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Komazawa University, 1-23-1, Komazawa, Setagaya-ku, Tokyo, 154-8525, Japan

    Satoru Suzuki

Authors
  1. Satoru Suzuki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Satoru Suzuki .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Utrecht University, Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands

    Mehdi Dastani

  2. Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China

    Huimin Dong

  3. University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg, Luxembourg

    Leon van der Torre

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Suzuki, S. (2020). Intuitionistic-Bayesian Semantics of First-Order Logic for Generics. In: Dastani, M., Dong, H., van der Torre, L. (eds) Logic and Argumentation. CLAR 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12061. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44638-3_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44638-3_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-44637-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-44638-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation