[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

BLIND: A Complete Identity Protection Framework for End-Points

  • Conference paper
Security Protocols (Security Protocols 2004)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNSC,volume 3957))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In this paper, we present a security framework that provides identity protection against active and passive attacks for end-points. The framework is based on a two-round-trip authenticated Diffie-Hellman key exchange protocol that identifies the end-points to each other and creates a security association between the peers. The protocol hides the public key based identifiers from attackers and eavesdroppers by blinding the identifiers. We complete the identity protection by offering location privacy with forwarding agents. To our knowledge, our privacy enhanced protocol is the first denial-of-service resistant two-round-trip key exchange protocol that offers identity protection for both communicating peers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Johnson, D., Perkins, C., Arkko, J.: Mobility Support in IPv6. Internet Draft, work in progress (June 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lamm, S.E., Reed, D.A., Scullin, W.H.: Real-time geographic visualization of world wide web traffic. World Wide Web Journal, The Web After Five Years (Summer 1996)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Perkins, C.: IP Mobility Support. RFC 2002 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Escudero-Pascual, A.: Privacy in the next generation internet: Data protection in the context of the european union policy. Ph.D. dissertation, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm (December 2002), [Online] Available: http://www.imit.kth.se/~aep/PhD/

  5. Aiello, W., Bellovin, S.M., Blaze, M., Canetti, R., Ionnadis, J., Keromytis, A., Reingold, O.: Efficient, dos-resistant, secure key exchange for internet protocols. ACM Computer Communications Review (November 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Saltzer, J., Reed, D., Clark, D.: End-To-End Arguments in System Design. ACM Transactions on Computer Systems 2 (November 1984)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Shea, G., Roe, M.: Child-proof Authentication for MIPv6 (CAM). ACM Computer Communications Review 31 (April 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Moskowitz, R., Nikander, P., Jokela, P., Henderson, T.: Host Identity Protocol. Internet Draft, work in progress (February 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nikander, P.: An architecture for authorization and delegation in distributed object-oriented agent systems. Ph.D. dissertation, Helsinki University of Technology, Helsinki (March 1999), [Online] Available: http://www.tml.hut.fi/~pnr/publications/PhDThesis.pdf

  10. Fuller, V., Li, T., Yu, J., Varadhan, K.: Classless Inter-Domain Routing (CIDR): an Address Assignment and Aggregation Strategy. RFC 1519 (September 1993)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Molina-Jimenez, C., Marshall, L.: True anonymity without mixes. In: Proc. IEEE Workshop on Internet Applications 2001, San Jose, CA (July 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Srisuresh, P., Holdrege, M.: IP Network Address Translator (NAT) Terminology and Considerations. RFC 2663 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Perlman. R.: Understanding IKEv2: Tutorial, and rationale for decisions. Internet Draft, work in progress (February 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nikander, P., Ylitalo, J., Wall, J.: Integrating Security, Mobility, and Multi-Homing in a HIP Way. In: Proc. Network and Distributed Systems Security Symposium, NDSS 2003, San Diego, CA, February (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Abadi, M.: Private authentication. In: Dingledine, R., Syverson, P.F. (eds.) PET 2002. LNCS, vol. 2482, pp. 27–40. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ylitalo, J., Nikander, P. (2006). BLIND: A Complete Identity Protection Framework for End-Points. In: Christianson, B., Crispo, B., Malcolm, J.A., Roe, M. (eds) Security Protocols. Security Protocols 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3957. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11861386_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11861386_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-40925-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-40926-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics