[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Modelling Agents’ Knowledge Inductively

  • Conference paper
Security Protocols (Security Protocols 1999)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1796))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This note introduces my extensions to Paulson’s “Inductive Approach” in order to reason about agents’ knowledge. First, I argue that an agent knows all the components of those messages she creates. I exploit this notion on some crypto-protocols with particular message structure. Then, I allow a new event, message reception, to occur on the network. This leads to a broad definition of agents’ knowledge, which extends the existing definition of spy’s knowledge. I will discuss strengths and weaknesses of the two models when proving session key knowledge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abadi, M., Burrows, M., Kaufman, C., Lampson, B.: Authentication and Delegation with Smart-cards. DIGITAL Technical Report 67, California (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bella, G.: Enhancing the Inductive Approach by Message Reception. Technical Report No. 460, Cambridge University, Computer Laboratory (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bella, G.: Are Timestamps Worth the Effort? A Formal Treatment. Technical Report No. 427, Cambridge University, Computer Laboratory (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bella, G., Paulson, L.C.: Kerberos Version IV: Inductive Analysis of the Secrecy Goals. In: Quisquater, J.-J., Deswarte, Y., Meadows, C., Gollmann, D. (eds.) ESORICS 1998. LNCS, vol. 1485, pp. 361–375. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Lowe, G.: A Hierarchy of Authentication Specifications. In: Proc. of Tenth IEEE Computer Security Foundations Workshop (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Paulson, L.C.: The Inductive Approach to Verifying Cryptographic Protocols. Journal of Computer Security 6, 85–128 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bella, G. (2000). Modelling Agents’ Knowledge Inductively. In: Christianson, B., Crispo, B., Malcolm, J.A., Roe, M. (eds) Security Protocols. Security Protocols 1999. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1796. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/10720107_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/10720107_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-67381-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45570-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics