[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

SafSec: Commonalities Between Safety and Security Assurance

  • Conference paper
Constituents of Modern System-safety Thinking

Abstract

Many systems, particularly in the military domain, must be certified or accredited by both safety and security authorities. Current practice argues safety and security accreditations separately. A research project called SafSec has been investigating a combined approach to safety and security argumentation, and has shown that there can be practical benefits in performing a combined analysis and documenting a combined argument for both safety and security.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • ARINC (1997). ARINC 651-1 Design Guidance for Integrated Modular Avionics, ARINC Incorporated, Annapolis, November 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawes and Steinacker (1997). Combining Assessment Techniques from Security and Safety to Assure IT System Dependability—The SQUALE Approach, VIS97 security conference, Freiburg, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO (1999). ISO 15408, Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation. International Standardisation Organisation August 1999 (Version 2.1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, T P (1999). Arguing Safety — A Systematic Approach to Safety Case Management, DPhil Thesis, York University, Department of Computer Science Report YCST 99/05.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, T P (2001). Concepts and Principles of Compositional Safety Case Construction, University of York, COSMA/2001/1/1, May 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • MoD (1996). UK Ministry of Defence, Defence Standard 00-56, Safety Management Requirements for Defence Systems, Parts 1 and 2, Issue 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Praxis (2004a). SafSec Standard Material S.P1199.50.2, Issue 2.6, May 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Praxis (2004b). SafSec Guidance Material S.P1199.50.3, Issue 2.6, May 2004.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lautieri, S., Cooper, D., Jackson, D. (2005). SafSec: Commonalities Between Safety and Security Assurance. In: Redmill, F., Anderson, T. (eds) Constituents of Modern System-safety Thinking. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-130-X_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-130-X_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-85233-952-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-130-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics