Temporal Disclosedness of Innovations

• Aanestad M., Hanseth O.. (2000), “Implementing open network technologies in complex work practices. A case from telemedicine”. In Proceedings from IFIP WG 8.2 International Conference. The Social and Organizational Perspective on Research and Practice in Information Technology, June 10–12, 2000, Aalborg, Denmark

  Google Scholar 

• Antonelli, C, (1992), “The economic theory of information networks”. In The Economics of Information Networks, ed. C. Antonelli, North-Holland, 1992

  Google Scholar 

• Argyris C, Schön D.A., (1996), Organizational Learning II, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1996.

  Google Scholar 

• Arthur, W.B., (1989), “Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock in by historical events”, Economic Journal 99: 116–131, 1989.

  Google Scholar 

• Arthur W.B., (1994), Increasing Returns and Path Dependency in the Economy, The University of Michigan Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Attewell P., (1992), “Technological Diffusion and Organizational Learning: The Case of Business Computing”, Organization Science, Vol. 3, Issue 1 (Feb., 1992), pp. 1–19.

  Google Scholar 

• Baskerville R., Pries-Heje J., (1997), “IT diffusion and innovation models: the conceptual domains”, in Facilitating Technology Transfer through Partnership: learning from practice and research, Proc. IFIP TC8 WG8.6 Conference, Tom McMaster Enid Mumford E.Burton Swanson Brian Warboys and David Wastell (eds.), Kluwer Academic Publisher.

  Google Scholar 

• Ciborra C.U., Lanzara G.F., (1994), “Formative Contexts and Information Technology: Understanding the Dynamics of Innovation in Organizations”, Accounting Management and Information Technology, Vol. 4,No. 2, pp. 61–86, 1994.

  Google Scholar 

• Ciborra C.U., (1996), “What does Groupware Mean for the Organizations Hosting it?”, in Groupware and TeamWork Invisible Aid or Technical Hindrance?, Claudio U. Ciborra ed., John Wiley & Sons, pp. 1–19.

  Google Scholar 

• Ciborra, C, (1999), “Notes on Improvisation and Time in Organizations”,Accounting, Management and Information Technologies 9 (1999).

  Google Scholar 

• Ciborra, C, Braa, K., Cordella, A., Dahlbom, B., Failla, A., Hanseth, O., Hepsø, V., Ljungberg, J., Monteiro, E., Simon, K., (2000), From Control to Drift The Dynamcs of Corporate Information Infrastructures, Oxford University Press, 2000.

  Google Scholar 

• Ciborra C. U., (2002), The Labyrinths of Information-Challenging the Wisdom of Systems, Oxford University Press

  Google Scholar 

• Cooper R. B., Zmud R.W., (1990), “Information Technology Implementation Research: A Technological Diffusion Approach”, Management Science, Vol. 36,No. 2 (Feb. 1990), pp. 123–39.

  Google Scholar 

• Damsgaard J., Lyytinen K., (1997), “Hong Kong’s EDI bandwagon: derailed or on the right track?”, in Facilitating Technology Transfer through Partnership learning from practice and research Proc. IFIP TC8 WG8.6 Conference, Tom McMaster Enid Mumford E.Burton Swanson Brian Warboys and David Wastell (eds.), Kluwer Academic Publisher.

  Google Scholar 

• David P., (1985), “Clio and the economics of QWERTY”, American Economic Review, Vol. 75 (1985), Issue 2 (May), pp. 332–37.

  Google Scholar 

• Dosi G., (1982), “Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: a suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change”, Research Policy, Vol. 11 (1982), pp. 147–62.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Fichman R.G., Kemerer C.F., (1999), “The Illusory Diffusion of Innovation: An Examination of Assimilation Gaps”, Information Systems Research, Vol. 10,No. 3, September 1999, pp. 255–75.

  Google Scholar 

• Gallivan M.J., (2001), “Organizational Adoption and Assimilation of Complex Technological Innovations: Development and Application of a New Framework”, The DATA BASE for Advances in Information System, Summer 2001, Vol. 32,No. 3, pp. 51–85.

  Google Scholar 

• Garud R., Karnøe P., (2001), Path Dependence and Creation, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers

  Google Scholar 

• Hanseth O., Monteiro E, Hatling M., (1996), “Developing information infrastructure: The tension between standardization and flexibility”. Science, Technology and Human Values. Vol. 21No. 4, Fall 1996,407–426.

  Google Scholar 

• Heidegger M., (1962), Being and Time, Blackwell Publisher Ltd.

  Google Scholar 

• Henfridsson O., (1999), IT-adaptation as sensemaking: inventing new meanings for technology in organizations, Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Informatics, Umeå University, Sweden.

  Google Scholar 

• Klein, H.K, and Myers, M.D., (1999), “A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems”, MIS Quarterly, vol. 23,no. 1, 1999, pp. 67–93.

  Google Scholar 

• Kwon T.H., Zmud R.W., (1987), “Unifying the fragmented models of information systems implementation”, in Critical Issues in Information Systems Research, R.J. Boland and R.A. Hirschheim eds., John Wiley & Sons, pp.227–51.

  Google Scholar 

• Langley A., (1999), “Strategies for theorizing from process data”, A-cademy of Management Review, 1999, Vol. 24,No. 4, 691–710.

  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Latour B., (1987), Science in Action, Harvard.

  Google Scholar 

• Leonard-Barton D., (1988), “Implementation as mutual adaptation of technology and organization”, Research Policy Vol. 17 (1988), pp. 251–67.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Lewin K, (1952), “Groups Decision and Social Change”, in Readings in Social Psychology, Newcombe and Hartley (Eds.), Henry Holt, New York, pp. 459–73.

  Google Scholar 

• Lyytinen K, Damsgaard J., (2001), “What’s wrong with the Diffusion Of Innovation Theory?”, in Diffusing Software Product and Process Innovations, Proc. IFIP TC8 WG8.6 Conference, Ardis M.A., Marcolin B.L. (eds.), Kluwer Academic Publisher.

  Google Scholar 

• McMaster T., Vidgen R.T., Wastell D.G., (1997), “Technology Transfer-diffusion or translation?”, in Facilitating Technology Transfer through Partnership: learningfrom practice and research, Proc. IFIPTC8 WG8.6 Conference, Tom McMaster Enid Mumford E.Burton Swanson Brian Warboys and David Wastell (eds.), Kluwer Academic Publisher.

  Google Scholar 

• Monteiro E., Hepsø V., (1998), “Diffusion of infrastructure: mobilisation and improvisation”, In Information systems current issues and future challenges, Proc. IFIP WG 8.2 & 8.6, T. Larsen L. Levine (eds.), IFIP 1998, pp. 255–274.

  Google Scholar 

• Newell, S., Swan, J.A., Robertson M., (1998). “A cross-national comparison of the adoption ofBPR: An interactive perspective”. 31st International Conference on Systems Sciences, IEEE Computer Society Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Newell, S., Swan, J.A., Galliers R.D.. (2000). “A knowledge-focused perspective on the diffusion and adoption of complex information technologies: The BPR example.” Information Systems Journal 10: pp.239–259.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Robertson, M., Swan, J., Newell S. (1996). “The role of networks in the diffusion of technological innovation.” Journal of Management Studies 33(3): pp.333–359.

  Google Scholar 

• Rogers E.M., (1995), Diffusion of Innovations, 4^th Edition, Free Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Rothwell, R. (1994) Towards the fifth generation innovation process. International Marketing Review, 11,7–31.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Swanson EB., Ramiller N.C., (1997), “The Organizing Vision in Information Systems Innovation”, Organization Science, Vol. 8, Issue 5 (Sep.–Oct., 1997), pp. 45874.

  Google Scholar 

• Van de Ven A.H., (1986), “Central Problems in the Management of Innovation”, Management Science, Vol. 32,No. 5, Organization Design (May, 1986), pp. 590–607.

  Google Scholar 

• Walsham, G., (1993), Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations, Wiley, 1993.

  Google Scholar 

• Walsham, G, (1995), “Interpretive case study in IS research: nature and method”, European Journal of Information Systems, Vol.4, 1995, pp.74–81.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Weick K.E., (1995), Sensemaking in Organizations, Thousand Oaks: Sage.

  Google Scholar 

• Wolfe R A., (1994), “Organizational Innovation: Review, Critique and Suggested Research Directions”, Journal of Management Studies, 31:3, May 1994, pp. 405–31.

  Google Scholar 

Download references