Skip to main content
Shikha M Shrivastav
  • Indirapuram
    Ghaziabad

Shikha M Shrivastav

UPTU Lucknow, Management, Faculty Member
Corporate India witnessed the burgeoning economic growth since the 1990s that brought to the forefront the need for Indian companies to adopt corporate governance standards and practices, which are in line with international guidelines.... more
Corporate India witnessed the burgeoning economic growth since the 1990s that brought to the forefront the need for Indian companies to adopt corporate governance standards and practices, which are in line with international guidelines. This paper contributes to the existing literature by providing a review of the conceptual as well as empirical researches in the area of corporate governance and firm performance by highlighting the relationship between the corporate governance mechanisms (board size, board composition, frequency of board meetings, CEO duality) and firm performance. The research findings are contradictory and inconsistent. Some studies founded a strong positive association while some reported negative relationship between corporate governance mechanisms and firm performance while others did not found any significant relationship between the two.
The objective of the paper is to survey the theoretical basis for and empirical evidences on the impact of ownership structur e on firm performance. The relationship between the various aspe cts of Ownership structure namely Ownership... more
The objective of the paper is to survey the theoretical basis for and empirical evidences on the impact of ownership structur e on firm performance. The relationship between the various aspe cts of Ownership structure namely Ownership concentration, Managerial Ownership, Directors’ Shareholding, Institutional Shareholding, Promoters Shareholding, Foreign Ownership and firm performance is reviewed.Ownership structure is considered as an import ant corporate governance mechanism to resolve the conflict arising between the managers and shareholders. Extensive theoretical and empirical work on this topic was done over the last two decades. However,there are inconsistencies in the results and the iof ownership structure on firm performance was found positive, negative and insignificant. The probable reasons for the inconsistencies include corporate governance environment, endogeneity of ownership structure and measures of firm performance used .
The paper analyses the relationship between Board Composition (proportion of non-executive directors) and Firm Performance of 145 non-financial NSE listed companies in India for a period of five years. The firm performance measures... more
The paper analyses the relationship between Board Composition (proportion of non-executive directors) and Firm Performance of 145 non-financial NSE listed companies in India for a period of five years. The firm performance measures include Tobin’s Q, Return on Assets, Return on Capital employed and Return on Equity. Econometric analysis is performed using Pooled OLS and Random Effect Model. The research findings reveal that Board composition has a negative and significant impact on firm performance. The results are robust for both econometric models and various performance measures used. The paper concluded that the negative impact of Board composition on firm performance is due to the fact that non-executive directors lack information about the operations of the firm which reduces their ability to function effectively hence reduces firm performance.
This paper seeks to examine the relationship between the CEO duality (one person serving the role of both chairman of the board and CEO) and firm performance. Existing literature on CEO duality is based on two theories of corporate... more
This paper seeks to examine the relationship between the CEO duality (one person serving the role of both chairman of the board and CEO) and firm performance. Existing literature on CEO duality is based on two theories of corporate governance. While agency theory suggests that CEO duality negatively affects performance, stewardship theory favors CEO duality and argues that it positively impacts the firm performance. The present paper adds to the existing literature by employing panel data of 145 non-financial companies listed on National Stock Exchange of India for a period of five years, i.e., 2008-2012. Firm performance has been measured using Tobin’s Q as a market-based measure, and Return on Equity (ROE) as accounting-based measure. Panel data is analyzed using fixed effect within and Least Square Dummy Variable (LSDV) model, random effect model and Feasible Generalized Least Square (FGLS) model. The paper concludes that when Tobin’s Q is used as performance measure, the presenc...
The paper seeks to examine the relationship between the corporate governance mechanisms (board size, board composition, board independence and CEO duality), ownership concentration (proxied by percentage of promoter's shareholding)... more
The paper seeks to examine the relationship between the corporate governance mechanisms (board size, board composition, board independence and CEO duality), ownership concentration (proxied by percentage of promoter's shareholding) and firm performance. The empirical analysis performed on the panel data of 178 non-financial National Stock Exchange-listed companies for 8 years, that is from 2008 to 2015. Firm performance has been measured using market-based measure Tobin's Q and accounting-based measure return on equity (ROE). Multiple regression analysis is performed using pooled ordinary least square regression and panel data regression models-fixed effect model and random effect model. The results of the study found that the impact of board size and board composition on the firm performance measures Tobin's Q and ROE is negative. Board independence is positively and significantly related to firm performance measures-Tobin's Q and ROE. The results revealed that ownership concentration has a positive and significant impact on firm performance. The positive influence of ownership concentration on firm performance implies that more substantial promoter stakes provide greater access to funds for initial investment and thereby lead to a larger scale of operation resulting in higher firm value. The study findings have significant implications for companies, researchers, academicians and policymakers engaged in corporate governance in emerging economies. The results of the study revealed that companies that comply with good corporate governance practices could expect to achieve higher financial performance and reduced agency costs. The results suggest that the policymakers should focus on increasing board independence, reducing board size to an extent and increasing the ownership concentration to the maximum level as stipulated by law to improve corporate governance standards.
This article seeks to examine the relationship between the board size and firm performance. Existing literature on board size is based on different theories of corporate governance. While agency theory and resource dependency theory... more
This article seeks to examine the relationship between the board size and firm performance. Existing literature on board size is based on different theories of corporate governance. While agency theory and resource dependency theory suggest that the board size positively affects performance, stewardship theory favours smaller board size and argues that larger board size negatively impacts the firm performance. The present article adds to the empirical literature by employing panel data analysis of 145 non-financial companies listed in the NSE CNX 200 Index of India corresponding to 16 industries. The study is carried out for a period of five years from 2008 to 2012. The firm performance has been measured using Tobin’s Q and the market-to-book value ratio (MBVR) as market-based measures and return on assets (ROA) and return on capital employed (ROCE) as accounting-based measures. The fixed effect model, random effect model and feasible generalised least square (FGLS) regression model...
The paper examines the impact of foreign ownership (foreign promoter, foreign corporate shareholding and foreign institutional investors) on firm performance. The empirical analysis is done on the panel data of 145 non-financial NSE... more
The paper examines the impact of foreign ownership (foreign promoter, foreign corporate shareholding and foreign institutional investors) on firm performance. The empirical analysis is done on the panel data of 145 non-financial NSE listed companies for a period of five years, i.e., from 2008-2012. Firm performance has been measured using market based measure Tobin's Q and accounting based measures Return on Assets (ROA) and Return on Equity (ROE). Multiple regression analysis is done using Pooled OLS and Panel Data-Random Effect Model. Foreign ownership is found to have a positive and significant impact on firm performance measures under Pooled OLS model, but the impact is found only positive in Random Effect Regression. The relationship between foreign corporate ownership and firm performance is positive and significant at varying level of significance. Foreign institutional ownership is found to have an ambiguous relationship with different firm performance measures used.
The paper examines the impact of foreign ownership (foreign promoter, foreign corporate shareholding and foreign institutional investors) on firm performance. The empirical analysis is done on the panel data of 145 non-financial NSE... more
The paper examines the impact of foreign ownership (foreign promoter, foreign corporate shareholding and foreign institutional investors) on firm performance. The empirical analysis is done on the panel data of 145 non-financial NSE listed companies for a period of five years, i.e., from 2008-2012. Firm performance has been measured using market based measure Tobin's Q and accounting based measures Return on Assets (ROA) and Return on Equity (ROE). Multiple regression analysis is done using Pooled OLS and Panel Data-Random Effect Model. Foreign ownership is found to have a positive and significant impact on firm performance measures under Pooled OLS model, but the impact is found only positive in Random Effect Regression. The relationship between foreign corporate ownership and firm performance is positive and significant at varying level of significance. Foreign institutional ownership is found to have an ambiguous relationship with different firm performance measures used.
Research Interests:
The paper analyses the relationship between Corporate Governance Disclosure Index (CGDI) and Firm Performance of 38 non-financial NSE listed companies in India for a period of five years from 2008-2012. The objective of the paper is to... more
The paper analyses the relationship between Corporate Governance Disclosure Index (CGDI) and Firm Performance of 38 non-financial NSE listed companies in India for a period of five years from 2008-2012. The objective of the paper is to examine the level of disclosure and the impact of such disclosure on the firm performance of NSE Nifty companies.The firm performance measures include Tobin's Q, Market to Book Value Ratio, Market Value Added, Return on Assets, Return on Capital Employed and Return on Equity. Econometric analysis is performed using Year-wise OLS Regression, Pooled OLS and Panel Data Models. The results of year-wise OLS regression analysis provided a strong evidence of strengthening of the relationship between CGDI and firm performance measures over the years. In brief, the research findings reveal that CGDI has a positive impact on firm performance based on market based measures as well as accounting based measures. The paper concludes firms that disclose more are likely to result in higher performance. The results also imply that firms are more willing to disclose more information leading to enhanced corporate governance mechanisms but there is still scope for the improvement. Fixed Effect Model, Random Effect Model, Feasible Generalized Least Square.
Research Interests:
Corporate Disclosures play a very pertinent role in ensuring accountability, integrity and transparency. It is through Corporate Disclosures that the firm communicates their relevant information to all its stakeholders. The objective of... more
Corporate Disclosures play a very pertinent role in ensuring accountability, integrity and transparency. It is
through Corporate Disclosures that the firm communicates their relevant information to all its stakeholders. The
objective of the paper is to survey empirical evidences on the impact of Corporate Governance Disclosures on
firm performance. Corporate Governance Disclosures indexes have been developed to measure the degree of
compliance by the organization and to find the effect of disclosure on firm performance. However, no standard
disclosure index has been yet formulated, thus the results varied in great extent. The reasons for the inconsistency
in the results of previous studies pertain to the different corporate governance environment, use of different firm
performance measures and the kind of methodology adopted.
Research Interests:
The Purpose of the paper is to critically analyse the existing literature on relationship between Gender Diversity and Company Financial Performances on the basis of current research. Companies are under immense encumbrance to assure... more
The Purpose of the paper is to critically analyse the existing literature on relationship between Gender Diversity
and Company Financial Performances on the basis of current research. Companies are under immense
encumbrance to assure diversity in the management of their company. Many studies are being conducted for
analysing the correlation between gender diversity and financial performance. Although research are
inconclusive whether gender diversity results in improved performance but credible studies by McKinsey &
Company, Catalyst, Credit Suisse Research Institute, PwC indicate that gender diversity leads to improved
financial performance.
Research Interests:
This article seeks to examine the relationship between the board size and firm performance. Existing literature on board size is based on different theories of corporate governance. While agency theory and resource dependency theory... more
This article seeks to examine the relationship between the board size and firm performance. Existing literature on board size is based on different theories of corporate governance. While agency theory and resource dependency theory suggest that the board size positively affects performance, stewardship theory favours smaller board size and argues that larger board size negatively impacts the firm performance. The present article adds to the empirical literature by employing panel data analysis of 145 non-financial companies listed in the NSE CNX 200 Index of India corresponding to 16 industries. The study is carried out for a period of five years from 2008 to 2012. The firm performance has been measured using Tobin's Q and the market-to-book value ratio (MBVR) as market-based measures and return on assets (ROA) and return on capital employed (ROCE) as accounting-based measures. The fixed effect model, random effect model and feasible generalised least square (FGLS) regression models are applied to achieve the above-mentioned objectives. The results conclude that the board size has a positive and significant impact on the firm performance.
Research Interests:
The objective of the paper is to survey the theoretical basis for and empirical evidences on the impact of ownership structure on firm performance. The relationship between the various aspects of Ownership structure namely Ownership... more
The objective of the paper is to survey the theoretical basis for and empirical evidences on the impact of ownership structure on firm performance. The relationship between the various aspects of Ownership structure namely Ownership concentration, Managerial Ownership, Directors' Shareholding, Institutional Shareholding, Promoters Shareholding, Foreign Ownership and firm performance is reviewed. Ownership structure is considered as an important corporate governance mechanism to resolve the conflict arising between the managers and shareholders. Extensive theoretical and empirical work on this topic was done over the last two decades. However, there are inconsistencies in the results and the impact of ownership structure on firm performance was found positive, negative and insignificant. The probable reasons for the inconsistencies include corporate governance environment, endogeneity of ownership structure and measures of firm performance used. 1.0 INTRODUCTION The issue of Corporate Governance have received considerable attention after plethora of corporate scandals and scams of the major giants across the world. The failure of several leading companies in India and abroad emphasized the importance of corporate governance issues in last two decades. Corporate governance mechanisms include board parameters and ownership structure. Ownership structure is considered as an important corporate governance mechanism to resolve the conflict arising between the managers and shareholders. How ownership structure affects the firm performance is one of the major issue of concern for the policy makers, economists and that of a company as well. The fundamental insight into this issue was given by Berle and Means (1932) who believed the diffusion of ownership results in decrease in firm performance. They argued that the separation of ownership and control reduces management's incentives to maximise the corporate efficiency of modern corporations. Jensen and Meckling (1976) further developed their concern in the form of Agency Theory which provided the framework for ownership and firm performance studies worldwide. This theory is based on Principal-Agent relationship, according to which the agents (managers) perform their functions which are not in line with the interest of the shareholders (principals) and thereby reduces their wealth. On the other hand Klein et al. (2005) stated, " presence of dispersed ownership increases expectation of a positive relationship between measures of corporate governance and firm performance, other things being equal. " Corporate governance literature has evolved with a great deal of attention towards the ownership structure of the companies. Extensive theoretical and empirical work on this topic was done over the last two decades. However, the impact of ownership structure on firm performance was widely studied in developed countries. The impact is discussed very recently in emerging markets like India. Thus an attempt has been made here to bridge the gap by focusing on the studies on emerging economy as well. Ownership studies throughout the world have focussed on the different aspects of ownership structure and their impact on corporate performance. 2.0 OBJECTIVE The objective of the paper is to provide a comprehensive review of the findings of the studies based on the relationship between ownership structure and firm performance. Along with findings, the methodology used to derive impact of ownership structure and the various aspects of ownership structure viz. promoter shareholding, institutional shareholding, directors shareholding, foreign ownership etc. on firm performance is presented. The remainder of this paper is organized as follows: section 2 briefly provides the review of existing literature encompassing the methodological aspects and main findings. Section 3 presents the probable reasons for the inconsistency in the research findings. Section 4 gives the directions for future research and section 5 concludes. 3.0.LITERATURE SHOWING RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE AND FIRM PERFORMANCE The onset of the separation of ownership and control in the modern organizations emphasized the need to study the effect of ownership parameter on the firm performance. Researchers have been trying to identify the optimal ownership structure and
The paper analyses the relationship between Board Composition (proportion of non-executive directors) and Firm Performance of 145 non-financial NSE listed companies in India for a period of five years. The firm performance measures... more
The paper analyses the relationship between Board Composition (proportion of non-executive directors) and Firm Performance of 145 non-financial NSE listed companies in India for a period of five years. The firm performance measures include Tobin's Q, Return on Assets, Return on Capital employed and Return on Equity. Econometric analysis is performed using Pooled OLS and Random Effect Model. The research findings reveal that Board composition has a negative and significant impact on firm performance. The results are robust for both econometric models and various performance measures used. The paper concluded that the negative impact of Board composition on firm performance is due to the fact that non-executive directors lack information about the operations of the firm which reduces their ability to function effectively hence reduces firm performance.
Corporate India witnessed the burgeoning economic growth since the 1990s that brought to the forefront the need for Indian companies to adopt corporate governance standards and practices, which are in line with international guidelines.... more
Corporate India witnessed the burgeoning economic growth since the 1990s that brought to the forefront the need for Indian companies to adopt corporate governance standards and practices, which are in line with international guidelines. This paper contributes to the existing literature by providing a review of the conceptual as well as empirical researches in the area of corporate governance and firm performance by highlighting the relationship between the corporate governance mechanisms (board size, board composition, frequency of board meetings, CEO duality) and firm performance. The research findings are contradictory and inconsistent. Some studies founded a strong positive association while some reported negative relationship between corporate governance mechanisms and firm performance while others did not found any significant relationship between the two.