You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.
I only looked at a couple, but it looks like you put a {{CC0}} license on it. That is a specific license given out by copyright owners, so if that license (specifically CC-Zero) is not present on the source page, it should not be used here. However, U.S. federal government works made by employees in the course of their duties are automatically public domain. So those should be fine, but change to use the {{PD-USGov-CDC}} license tag instead. There is also a {{CDC-PHIL}} source template where you can give the image ID as an argument, to be a more obvious source statement. Not all PHIL images are public domain, but the ones which explicitly say that should be fine to use that license. Once you switch to the PD-USGov license, remove the speedy delete tags. Carl Lindberg (talk) 17:33, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Thanks for uploading OWID maps and charts. However, please add relevant categories to them such as "Our World in Data", "{year} maps of the world" or "World maps of {disease}". I've been doing this for your recent past uploads, please do it on your own from now on instead of uploading the images without categories.
Moreover, please copy the map/chart descriptions from OWID and give the images proper titles. Example "File:Child-stunting-ihme (4).png" should be something more meaningful and informative such as "File:World map of children who are stunted, 2016" and the caption should be more than "child stunting" and the description not also "child stunting" but relevant info from OWID. Please don't leave all these things for other editors to fix, and except for the categories that usually isn't done so it's your job to take care of that.
I see above that your were told about this previously. Please, check to see if more of your uploads are still uncategorized. Thanks again, -- Ooligan (talk) 15:59, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
i didn't say he is doing wrong. i just asked him to do it.
and for the proposal, im gonna look into it. but since "names should be english only" and "forbidden" is not ok for me. if people gonna not adding proper names for their files will they be get warning or a block? modern_primatඞඞඞ ----TALK14:57, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I wasn't implying you're saying that and asked a similar thing just a section above. Also to copyedit my comment I meant to say "I couldn't find you". Good to have feedback on why people don't support this proposal: that it would require that "names should be english only" is a misconception and false. Even if that guideline was adopted they wouldn't be blocked, maybe what should be done should be in the guideline, I think they would be warned and if they don't change that after multiple warnings then a block may be possible but I haven't looked into that possibility, probably it would be time-limited at first. Prototyperspective (talk) 15:04, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]