User talk:Hoebele

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Hoebele!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文(台灣)‎ | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 13:33, 6 November 2012 (UTC)


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 13:34, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Boels Dolmans Cycling Team 2014 - cropped.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Mbch331 (talk) 12:22, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:2017 Amstel Gold Race Ladies 117.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Artix Kreiger (talk) 15:09, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Community Insights Survey

[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 01:14, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 15:24, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 20:04, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Op dezelfde plek

[edit]

Hi Hoebele, Vanmiddag ben ik onder andere hier geweest om foto's te nemen. Ik zie dat je er een dag eerder was dan ik. Nog even en we komen elkaar ergens tegen. :-) Romaine (talk) 19:35, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Een kwestie van geduld haha! Hoebele (talk) 22:27, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Hoebele, Zover ik weet zijn we elkaar nog niet tegengekomen... Althans niet dat ik weet. Ondertussen heb je al gezien dat ik foto's van afgelopen jaar ben gaan uploaden. Ik werk vanuit een spreadsheet en werk gebied voor gebied af en markeer zo welke objecten al gefotografeerd zijn en welke niet. Eijsden-Margraten is nu afgewerkt. Tevens voeg ik de veldkruus-box toe. De vraag is wel soms hoe je snel de juiste categorie terug vindt. Naast het navigeren naar de plaats of de wegkruis-categorie, kun je ook zoeken op de identificatiecode die op de website van veldkruus.nl wordt gebruikt via dit onderstaande zoekvenster: vul na het =-teken het nummer en je krijgt een overzicht van pagina's die er naar linken. Overal waar de veldkruus-box staat, is de categorie via onderstaande te vinden.

Soms lijkt het misschien alsof foto's dubbel zijn, maar ik denk dat het goed is om keuze te hebben. Ook nieuwe foto's na verloop van tijd zijn denk ik welkom en tonen mooi hoe het met het religieus erfgoed door de tijd heen verloopt.

Maar ik heb wel een vraag of je misschien interesse hebt aan meer fototochten? Drie onderwerpen zijn nog niet volledig gefotografeerd in Zuid-Limburg: kunstwerken, soms ook oorlogsmonumenten en meibomen. Lijsten van kunstwerken hebben we al, maar zijn vaak onvolledig. Dit geldt ook regelmatig voor de oorlogsmonumenten. Ik wil later dit jaar een lijst gaan maken op Wikipedia met daarin alle meibomen van Nederland en daarvoor zouden we meer foto's kunnen gebruiken van iedere meiboom en de eventuele oprichting. Misschien kunnen we samen gecoördineerd deze lijsten vervolledigen? Groetjes - Romaine (talk) 16:20, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Zeker heb ik daar interesse in! Ik was al begonnen met enkele (oude) foto's van meidennen en monumenten. Hoe kan ik je persoonlijk (bijv mail) bereiken? Hoebele (talk) 10:57, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Exposure value

[edit]

Thanx for uploading cycling photos. But you have to put more exposure, add in forward +0,3 or +0,7 or do latter in Photoshop. --Mile (talk) 15:39, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pinkpop posters 3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:00, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 07:47, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Categorieën

[edit]

Hoi @Hoebele, bedankt voor het toevoegen van diverse Year-in-municipality-categorieën. Ik begrijp de aanleg van Category:2024 in Voerendaal met 15 foto's of Category:2024 in Landgraaf met zelfs 30 foto's. Helaas kan ik je bij het creëren van Category:2023 in Weert met maar liefst een foto niet volgen. Wat zal hiervan de nut zijn? Het foto mag net zo goed in Category:2023 in Limburg (Netherlands). Vriendelijk groet, Fantaglobe11 (talk) 14:40, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Het lijkt me sterk dat dit de enige foto is die in 2023 in de stad/gemeente Weert is gemaakt. Na even zoeken kwam ik al een tweede tegen. Er zijn er vast meer te vinden, die niet in de Category:2023 in Limburg zitten. Hoebele (talk) 15:40, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hoi, dan vind ik het persoonlijk slimmer, als deze foto's eerst in Category:2023 in Limburg (Netherlands) geplaatst worden. Naar mijn mening is het overzichtelijker, om 5 foto's uit 5 verschillende gemeenten in de provincie-categorie toe te voegen dan extra 5 verschillende gemeente-categorieën met ieder maar liefst 1 foto te creëren. Wat is jouw mening hierover? Fantaglobe11 (talk) 11:12, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]