User talk:EACC80

This is a Wikimedia Commons user talk page.

This is not an article, file or the talk page of an article or file. If you find this page on any site other than the Wikimedia Commons you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user to whom this talk page belongs may have no personal affiliation with any site other than the Wikimedia Commons itself. The original page is located at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:EACC80.

This is the user talk page of EACC80, where you can send messages and comments to EACC80.

• Be polite.
• Be friendly.
• Assume good faith.
• No personal attacks.

• Please sign and date your entries by clicking on the appropriate button or by typing four tildes (~~~~) at the end.
• Put new text under old text.
• New to Wikimedia Commons? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers as soon as possible.
• Click here to start a new topic.

Archives 2023

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, EACC80!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Eisenach24 Bushaltestelle Neuenhof Sportpl at.JPG

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Eisenach24 Bushaltestelle Neuenhof Sportpl at.JPG, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

Didym (talk) 18:55, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

Category:Communication towers in Eisenach

Category:Communication towers in Eisenach is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified: CSD C2 (unuseful empty category) If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log. If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Prototyperspective (talk) 09:56, 13 October 2024 (UTC)

Recreation of "categories by material" categories

hi. I don't really think recreating Category:Categories of Schleid (Rhön) by material was a good move. As it insinuates the categories have materials, which is just nonsensical. Category names aren't suppose to be ambiguous anyway. Although admittedly it's a wider problem since Category:Categories by material exists but I think that's an excuse to undue people's attempts clean it up by recreating previously deleted categories. So please maybe think about if the category name makes sense before creating or recreating them next time. Otherwise your causing extra work when it's eventually dealt with again. Thanks. Adamant1 (talk) 04:19, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

I was an engineer by profession and still work and think like an engineer. Systematized thinking in categories is a prerequisite for meaningful and structured work. Without this system, sciences such as geology, chemistry, archaeology, etc. are unimaginable. There is now a new discipline in computer science - the keyword "data mining" is often used in the discussion to describe all initiatives that evaluate research results from online databases through meaningful queries - similar to criminal searches during a manhunt. However, this work requires structured data sets that are distributed as broadly as possible. This makes the data statistically more reliable. The work I have been doing for a year is intended to make exactly that possible. Complete overviews of certain topics should be available as soon as possible. This is a lot of work that no normal user would otherwise do. But this is the only way to make uncomplicated and reliable evaluations possible. Even if things made of wood are rather banal here - it is a material used worldwide and the entries associated with it will therefore be helpful for comparisons. EACC80 (talk) 10:42, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

Kategorien vs. Wikidata

Hallo EACC80, natürlich kann man auf Commons-Kategorien mit allen möglichen Aspekten der darin enthaltenen Bilder anlegen. Das führt in der Konsequenz allerdings zu exponteniell vielen Kategorien, die im Zweifel sehr wenige Bilder enthalten und weder machinell noch von Menschen sinnvoll ausgelesen werden können. Wären nicht die per Kategorien definierten Meta-Informationen besser auf Wikidata aufgehoben wären? Im Idealfall hätte jedes relevante Objekt eine Commons-Kategorie, die mit einem Wikidata-Item verbunden ist. Dieser Item enthält dann alles, was das Objekt beschreibt, also z. B. dessen Lage (geografisch und organisatorisch), Architektur-Stil, Baujahr, Denkmalstatus usw. Dadurch kann man Bilder auf Basis dieser Daten auch strukturiert abfragen und ist nicht an das Benennung der Kategorien (deren Sprache etc.) gebunden. Außerdem spart man sich bei oranisatorischen Änderungen (Stichwort: Gebietsreformen) auch einen riesigen Aufwand alle diese Kategorien und deren Inhalte zu verschieben. Der Fokus von Commons sind Medien/Bilder und nur teilweise die Metainformationen zu den Dingen, die auf den Medien abgebildet sind. Dafür gibt es Wikidata. Mein Plädoyer ist also, sich bei den Kategorien auf das Wesentliche zu beschränken und den Rest auf Wikidata zu erfassen. Gruß, --Arnd 🇺🇦 (talk) 21:25, 30 October 2024 (UTC)

Hallo Arnd - ich bedanke mich für Deinen Hinweis und werde da auch zeitnah einige sinnvolle Ergänzungen in meinem täglichen Ablauf übernehmen. das ganze zielt offenbar auf Wikidata. In den letzten Jahren habe ich schon diverse Wikis mit Content ergänzt, ... bei Wikidata habe ich den Stecker gezogen, Wiki ist mal als Teamwork und nicht Onemanshow geplant gewesen. Aber es gibt nun auch eine sinnvolle Erweiterung - die ich gerade erst gefunden habe "wikishootme". Dieses Projekt macht es möglich, rasch in einem bestimmten Bereich vorhandene Fotos zu finden, vorausgesetzt (!) der Marker wurde richtig platziert. Ich habe mich noch nicht viel damit beschäftigt, aber mit diesem Tool dürfte es sicher einfacher werden, Bilder zu verwalten.

Aber nun mal einige Hinweise, die für meine Arbeit wichtig sind: ich habe in den letzten 15-20 Jahren viele (Dokumentar-)Fotos gemacht, um die Veränderungen in den Orten als Momentaufnahmen zu erfassen. In den 2000er Jahren hatten wir diverse Ausstellungen zur Wendezeit mit Gegenüberstellungen DDR-Ruine und heutige Bebauung, das war auch für mich ein Grund die Fotos "auf Vorrat" zu schießen. Das Leben geht weiter und der Mensch vergisst auch viel. Inzwischen kommen zwei neue Aspekte hinzu: Genealogie - ich habe oft Anfragen zu meinen Fotos oder in diversen Foren - meine Vorfahren haben vermutlich in diesem Ort/Kiez gelebt - kann man da noch Bilder bekommen? Das ist über Commons sehr viel einfacher als das per Mail zu bewältigen - zudem kannman die Bilder auch per Google Bildersuche finden, in Commons zu suchen ist schon eher was für Freaks??? Der wichtigste Grund aber ist: die Zeiten der Leitz-Ordner gehen zu Ende - ich habe gute Kontakte zu zahlreichen Ortschronisten oder Heimatforschern und die erfuhren vor zwei Jahren - bitte stellt Eure Arbeit auf Digitalisate um - Bilder bitte mit Urhebernachweis und Karten möglichst von OSM, denn dann lauern da keine Problem, wenn man was publizieren will. Aber die überwiegende Zahl der Chronisten kümmert sich um Events und die örtlichen Gegebenheiten werden einfach als unwichtig betrachtet. Wenn in 10..15 Jahren wieder ein Jubiläum folgt wird man mit Erschrecken feststellen, das diverse Motive nicht mehr auffindbar sind oder Baustellenfotos zu einem Gebäude interessanter sind, als die straßenseitige Fassade,.. Ich mache daher auch Friedhöfe, Parks und Gartenanlagen, Kinderspielplätze, Jugendclubs, Shops und Gewerbebetriebe, ... - auch wenn das eigentlich banale Motive sind. In einer Chronik werden sie irgendwann die Bilder sein, die mehr als 1000 Worte erzählen. Eine weitere Thematik sind diverse Fotos von Rad- und Wanderwegen, (Beschilderungen, Karten, Wegzeichen) das wird in Wikivoyage und OSM einfließen. Also Du siehst, mir geht es mehr um das große Ganze als um irgendwelche prämierten Topmotive bei "Wiki loves ..." Letzter Hinweis - die Anzahl der Bilder in einer Kategorie ist vielleicht ein Maß für die Bekanntheit des Motivs. Ich denke an die Wartburg - da werden ständig fast immer die gleichen Motive hinzu geladen. Zum Glück läuft der Speicher nicht über ;-) - Soweit meine Hinweise und Gedanken. Ich poste Dir in Kürze noch mal zum Kategorie-System auf Deiner Diskussionsseite ... Viele Grüße aus dem WAK 17:23, 31 October 2024 (UTC) EACC80 (talk) 17:23, 31 October 2024 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Wünschensuhl23 diverse Bänke 01.jpg

Copyright status: File:Wünschensuhl23 diverse Bänke 01.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Wünschensuhl23 diverse Bänke 01.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

• File:Wünschensuhl23 diverse Bänke 02.jpg

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 17:06, 3 November 2024 (UTC)