Xauxa

Archives

User talk:Xauxa/Archive-2007

Imágenes

Hola.

Me podrías decir a que pueblo pertenecen esta imagen y las demás de la serie.

Muchas gracias. Un saludo.--FCPB (talk) 15:14, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

Las imagenes son de "Campo del Agua", (nort-oeste de Aira da Pedra). Villafranca del Bierzo. El Bierzo, Spain. (Info now also given in the description to the fotos.) Saludos Xauxa (talk) 22:30, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Gracias, conozco Campo del Agua, pero quería asegurarme. Un saludo.--FCPB (talk) 23:05, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

File:Sö 301 Ågesta bro alternative view.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 22:18, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Done. Xauxa (talk) 20:38, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Visingso Tempelgarden Statue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Question Is there Freedom of Panorama in Sweden? --Iotatau 10:13, 18 February 2010 (UTC) Yes it is. --Ankara 10:35, 18 February 2010 (UTC) Thanks. Good image so I'll promote it. --Iotatau 11:15, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Re: Ministerios

Hola,

Yo hice la foto desde el puente de la autopista M-30, es decir, desde aquí. Supongo que al estar tan lejos del Ministerio no hay ningún problema. Pero parece ser que existen las llamadas zonas de seguridad alrededor de algunos edificios oficiales, tanto civiles como militares. Por ejemplo, hace dos años yo estaba fotografiando el Cuartel General del Ejército del Aire (Madrid), y un policía me dijo que no podía hacerlo, ya que estaba dentro de la zona de seguridad. He encontrado esta información en Internet sobre la prohibición de hacer fotografías, por si te interesa.

Pero nosotros hemos tenido suerte. Si estuviéramos en Londres podría haber sido peor :).

Saludos.

--Zaqarbal (talk) 11:43, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

Hola Luis,

Gracias por tu respuesta. He leido el articulo, varios incidentes contados también han pasado a mí. Creo que pasé el limite de seguridad por el ministerio, pero son un poco susceptibles, pienso. (Excellente foto de la Torre Picasso de Madrid en el articulo!) Saludos –Xauxa (talk) 19:56, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Linkoping Domkyrka GrotesqueFigures02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice composition --Mbdortmund 15:23, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nuevos Ministerios-Arcada01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharp and beautiful composition QI IMO --Croucrou 20:15, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Madrid Paseo de Castellana.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments what is the "thing" in the corner right above ? Furthermore, a slight persp. dist. for the right tower (please see annotations). Would support if corrected.--Jebulon 22:41, 3 July 2010 (UTC) New version uploaded.--Xauxa 22:17, 4 July 2010 (UTC)OK, Support.--Jebulon 19:53, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

File:Madrid Juan Pablo II-view2.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 22:36, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

File:Madrid Juan Pablo II-view.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 22:36, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

File:Madrid Juan Pablo II-Huerto medieval.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 22:37, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

File:Madrid Juan Pablo II-view3.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 22:43, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

File:Madrid Juan Pablo II-view6.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 22:55, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

File:Madrid Juan Pablo II-view5.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 22:56, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

File:Madrid Juan Pablo II-view4.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 22:56, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Love your pics

Just wanted to say: I love your pics. --George (talk) 11:44, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Thankyou very much for saying so. This year so far, I have been lucky to receive 4 QI-tags, which is a great encouragment. Things like that together with cheers from users like you make me happy, thanks. --Xauxa (talk) 22:50, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bjursaas kyrka organ balcony.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments perfect symmetry, clean composition, good perspective. --Ikiwaner 17:25, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hammerdal kyrka view2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Well composed, good photo.--MrPanyGoff 06:07, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Askeby church pieta04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Some noise in the background at full resolution, but otherwise very good. -- MJJR 21:59, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Froso kyrka Jungfru Maria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Carschten 18:12, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Xauxa!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 18:51, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

• Image:Kristbergs kyrka-distant view.jpg was uncategorized on 10 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 18:51, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

Sorry, missed - as sometimes happens - my ordinary routine! --Xauxa (talk) 21:48, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bilbao Euskotran 404.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Picture is tilted ccw (towers on the left, buildings on the right). --Coyau 21:38, 4 December 2011 (UTC) -- Vertical lines are most important in architectural images, in this case IMHO they seem to have minor importance. Nevertheless, I have corrected as suggested, as good as I could do. --Xauxa 08:03, 6 December 2011 (UTC) Good now. --Coyau 21:18, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

Thank you! --Xauxa (talk) 21:48, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saintes Eglise Saint Eutrope-Church window01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Needs an identification (je suppose que c'est Sainte Eustelle)--Jebulon 15:44, 4 December 2011 (UTC) Also horizontal lines are leaning to the right on the top. --Coyau 21:38, 4 December 2011 (UTC) -- Vertical/horisontal lines corrected, information about martyr Saint Eustelle added. --Xauxa 08:26, 6 December 2011 (UTC)  Support Good for me. --Coyau 21:18, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

Thank you!! --Xauxa (talk) 21:48, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

Authorization for use of image

Hi, Xauxa!

The picture of St. Teresa of Avila is wonderful! We are publishing a book about one of the parts of the Complete Works of St. Teresa, called "Foundations." We would like your permission to use this image on the cover. Please could you send us in a better resolution? Thank you so much!! paula@loyola.com.br

I am sorry to say that there is no higher resolution of that image (I suppose you mean the statue). It was taken in times when I had to spare my memory cards. When I pass Ávila I can take it oncemore, but I have no such journey planned for in the nearest future, so of course it will be too late for you. --Xauxa (talk) 23:36, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

(answer also sent to e-mail address above)

File:Hita-solar watch.jpg

English word is "sundial"... AnonMoos (talk) 02:14, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Yes, of course. Thanks for correcting the description text. --Xauxa (talk) 21:42, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Rosinos-Sanctuary Virgen del Campo 10.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 21:19, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Rosinos-Sanctuary Virgen del Campo 09.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 21:20, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Rosinos-Sanctuary Virgen del Campo 08.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 21:21, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Rosinos-Sanctuary Virgen del Campo 07.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 21:21, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Rosinos-Sanctuary Virgen del Campo 06.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 21:22, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Rosinos-Sanctuary Virgen del Campo 05.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 21:23, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Rosinos-Sanctuary Virgen del Campo 04.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 21:23, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Rosinos-Sanctuary Virgen del Campo 03.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 21:24, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Rosinos-Sanctuary Virgen del Campo 02.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 21:24, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

Files "Rosinos-Sanctuary Virgen del Campo 02.jpg" to "Rosinos-Sanctuary Virgen del Campo 10.jpg" have now been licensed. Sigh! --Xauxa (talk) 21:39, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sepulveda Iglesia y Monasterio de San Frutos-2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 15:56, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Wiki loves monuments

Hej! Jag ser att du har laddat upp en del bilder som skulle kunna vara med i Wiki Loves Monuments tävlingen. Lägg gärna till mallen {{wikilovesmonuments|se}} på de bilderna där du kan byta ut se mot landskoden för de bilderna som inte är svenska. Mvh Ainali (talk) 10:51, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Jo, det verkade lite jobbigt bara, måste man kolla emot någon lista eller så, eller räcker det med att fota ett monument och lägga dit mallen? :) Xauxa (talk) 22:15, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Inte så lätt att lägga till i efterhand, men det gick. (Y:et i Timrå) Xauxa (talk) 22:41, 17 September 2012 (UTC) redrawn, not listed Xauxa (talk) 10:46, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seskaro Aludden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. - A.Savin 15:39, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Solna_Brick_wall_4-skifts_munkforband.jpg

Hello Xauxa, I wonder if you could tell me which building you were taking a picture of here? I would like to know so I can put the pic onto on the English WP Brickwork page, and be exact about its identity. It's a nice pic; well done!
Jonathanriley (talk) 21:00, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Update:
Well there you go -- your photo is on there now:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brickwork#Monk_bond

... but it would be much nicer if I could mention the building to which it belongs. If you are worried that the building is a private house, then you could just say so -- that would be no problem for me at all! Then I could edit the article to say 'A private building, St Martins Road, etc. etc.'

Anyhow, thanks for uploading the pic to the WM Commons, its a great pic. :)
Jonathanriley (talk) 16:07, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

Hello Jonathan

I have put coordinates in the description of the picture. In google-maps you can spot this row/file of small private houses, built in English style. The picture was taken five years ago, but maybee it was the second house on left handside. At least I now could see some grapes growing, looking through the fence (in street-view). Very nice looking houses. An interesting article you have done, I have to read it more closely. Xauxa (talk) 10:46, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

Why don´t you consider to use this File:Arvika 10skift munkforband.jpg, instead of the present one from Arvika. It will show the way the corners are made, and it is the same building, Former Post Office. The picture you have chosen gives the texture, but I perhaps should not have made it so tilted. Theres a cropped version too, but not sharp. Xauxa (talk) 10:55, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the message Xauxa. I do like the alternate pic you've linked, and i take your point about the highlighting of the quoins there. However, the pic that's in the WP page at the moment is nice for conveying those great diagonals swishing down the building, which are obviously differently derived diagonals from those of the New Malden Library building in the pic just above. The corner shot just doesn't get these diagonals at all.

These are all super pics though. Thanks again Xauxa, great work!
Jonathanriley (talk) 23:52, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

Quite interesting, alls those bonds. The 10-layers monk bond is not so easy to find, at least not in such great area as is shown in the Former Post Office, Arvika. However, if I get close to one, I will take a better picture. Xauxa (talk) 11:07, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Timra Y-et.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for me. A bit dark shadows, but not disturbing for the main motif. V-wolf 09:11, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012! Dear Xauxa, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 13:50, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Iglesia de San Juan en El Bierzo

He notado que has vinculado las fotos de la iglesia de San Juan de Fiz con el municipio de Corullón, sin embargo está en el de Villafranca del Bierzo, justo en el límite con Corullón, pero en Villafranca. Sería recomendable cambiar el nombre a las fotos para evitar confusiones. Si así lo quieres puedo encargarme de ello. --DPC (talk) 17:01, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

Vale, sí me puedes ayudar con eso, te agradesco! Gracias por notificarme. Xauxa (talk) 22:48, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

---

Wiki Loves Public Art about to take off! Dear Xauxa, During May we are running Wiki Loves Public Art, a photo contest focused on getting photographs of artworks and sculptures uploaded to Wikimedia Commons. Have a look at the lists of objects included, and of participating GLAMs in your country, and upload as many images as you can. Kind regards, the organizers of Wiki Loves Public Art

Message delivered by odderBot on 14:28, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Brownie2 overview3.jpg

Could you possibly supply the dimensions for this on the desciption page or on the image itself (ruler, hand etc...): ? Soerfm (talk) 19:03, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

The camera was loaded with roll film, 9 x 12 cm. This will give you a hint of the measures. Unfortunately the camera is stored away in some archive box, not sufficiently localizated yet, I will fulfill the measurements in due course. (a intelligent guess would be around 12x15x19 cm. --Xauxa (talk) 21:59, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Correct measures are: 9.8 x 15.9 x 18.4 cm. --Xauxa (talk) 09:54, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	Gracias! ;-) Besserwissern (talk) 08:24, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Thank you, I like that! --Xauxa (talk) 21:44, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

Permission to Use Image

Hello Xauxa.

Thank you for sharing your great photos on Wikimedia Commons! I am contributing to a academic book to be published by the University of Arizona Press, and I would like to use your photo of the shicra at Caral-Supe in my chapter (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:PeruCaral22.jpg).

Can I have permissions to use the photo, and the language you would like me to use for the correct attribution? If it is more convenient, you can reply directly to my email address: youngwolfeh@yahoo.com

Many thanks!

Halona Young-Wolfe MA Binghamton University

I have responded directly to the given e-mail addres.--Xauxa (talk) 18:29, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Another request for kind permission...

Dear Xauxa, I am sorry for my poor English. I am preparing a paper for Czech archaeological revue "Archeologicke rozhledy" on the primal significance of the Czech romanesques churches (kostel in czech language). I discuss also a possibility of comparison with swedisch Kastaler. I found your nice photos of the Valleberga and Gammelgarn churches and kastals and I would like to ask you a kindly permission to use it in my text. The attribution of photos is automatic as well as sending the issue with the paper when printed (next year). I would by grateful if you could write me wether you would agree with the publication and under what conditions. Thank you for your activity in Wiki!

Sincerely, Filip Laval, Prague, laval@arup.cas.cz

I have responded positively and directly to the given e-mail address. --Xauxa (talk) 23:10, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Dear Xauxa, I am sorry for disturbing you again with the same topic, several months later. Many thanks for your positive reaction! I did not find your message in the inbox of previously given e-mail address, could you please redirect it or rewrite to lavalf@hotmail.com? Thank you again, sincerely Filip Laval

Done! Now you can look in your mailbox. --Xauxa (talk) 23:04, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Today I received very surprisingly a copy of the book mentioned above. My photos are nicely reproduced in the book. Thankyou very much! --Xauxa (talk) 09:29, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Permission to use Soderledskyrkan_brick_wall.jpg in a derivative work

Hello Xauxa,

I would like to use your image (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Soderledskyrkan_brick_wall.jpg) in a logo-design. I would highly appreciate it if you messaged me at xaroy@web.de with details about the conditions of usage and modification of the image!

I have responded positively and directly to the given e-mail address.--Xauxa (talk) 23:43, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Riksrådsvägen 1956, d.jpg

Yours sincerely, Josve05a (talk) 15:00, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

File:ValleDeLosCaidos Main cupola2.jpg

File:ValleDeLosCaidos Main cupola2.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

. HombreDHojalata.^talk 20:28, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

File:ValleDeLosCaidos Main cupola4.jpg

File:ValleDeLosCaidos Main cupola4.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

. HombreDHojalata.^talk 20:28, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

EscorialBiblioteca

Dear Xauxa, I am a Prof. in Architecture and I am currently redacting a book titled “History of Interior Design and Furniture” and it will be published in Turkish edition. I would like to use your image from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/El_Escorial#/media/File:EscorialBiblioteca.jpg. At the end of the book, the name of the beholder of the image is noted in ‘Picture Credits.’ Best regards, Mustafa Demirkan mustafaemindemirkan@gmail.com hippofish 14:12, 11 May 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Serhatakbak (talk • contribs) 14:12, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

That is okey with me. Thankyou for telling me. Xauxa (talk) 16:43, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

September är nästan slut: missa inte Wiki Loves Monuments 2019!

Hej,

Du får det här meddelandet då du tidigare bidragit med bilder till den svenska deltävlingen av Wiki Loves Monuments, och jag hoppas att du vill vara med i år också. Kategorierna är som vanligt byggnadsminnen, fornminnen, K-märkta fartyg och arbetslivsmuseer, och du är välkommen att bidra med bilder hela september. Om du varit ute i världen och rest kan du även se om resorna sammanfaller med övriga internationella deltävlingar, och i så fall vara med och tävla även där.

Välkommen till tävlingen, och lycka till! /Axel Pettersson (WMSE) (talk) 15:32, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

Nu är det dags för Wiki Loves Monuments 2020!

Vinnarbilden i Wiki Loves Earth!

Hej!

(For information in English, see Wiki Loves Monuments 2020 in Sweden or other participating countries.)

Du får det här meddelandet då du tidigare har deltagit i de svenska deltävlingarna av Wiki Loves Monuments eller Wiki Loves Earth! För någon vecka sedan blev det klart vem som tog hem förstapriset i Wiki Loves Earth 2020 – stort grattis till Brydand100 och hans fotografi av Röttlefallet! Alla vinnare kan du se här – tack alla deltagare för fina bidrag!

Den 1 september inleds 2020 års svenska deltävling av Wiki Loves Monuments, där det skulle vara väldigt roligt om du ville vara med och delta! Målet med Wiki Loves Monuments är att fotografera svenska kulturarvsmonument. De kategorier som ingår är byggnadsminnen, fornminnen, K-märkta fartyg och arbetslivsmuseer – och du är välkommen att bidra med bilder hela september.

Välkommen till tävlingen, och lycka till! /Eric Luth (WMSE) (talk) 14:27, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

File:ValleDeLosCaidos Main cupola1.jpg

File:ValleDeLosCaidos Main cupola1.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Copyrigh Santiago Padrós Elías (1918-1971) and heirs. See Commons:Derivative work Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

. HombreDHojalata.^talk 13:07, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

File:ValleDeLosCaidos Main cupola3.jpg

File:ValleDeLosCaidos Main cupola3.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Copyrigh Santiago Padrós Elías (1918-1971) and heirs. See Commons:Derivative work Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

. HombreDHojalata.^talk 13:07, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

File:Dorotea church altar02.jpg

File:Dorotea church altar02.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Torsten Nordberg died in 1962, therefore photos of his paintings (permanently located inside a church, and therefore not subject to Freedom of Panorama) can only be PD as of January 1, 2033 Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

DS (talk) 14:48, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

File:Dorotea church altar02.jpg

File:Dorotea church altar02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 14:59, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

File:Columbus landing on Hispaniola adj.jpg

File:Columbus landing on Hispaniola adj.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 09:57, 8 November 2024 (UTC)