This paper aims to provide guidance to educators who wish to adopt arts-based approaches through theorizing the experience of its authors, three doctoral students, in facilitating a relational sculpturing session in the context of a class...
moreThis paper aims to provide guidance to educators who wish to adopt arts-based approaches through theorizing the experience of its authors, three doctoral students, in facilitating a relational sculpturing session in the context of a class on globalization. The paper begins by defining arts-based teaching, pointing to its identified benefits and risks alongside an explanation of the process of relational sculpting. Next, it tells of and analyzes the authors' experiences in order to point to tentative guidelines for facilitating arts-based sessions. These guidelines are intended to serve both an ethical and educational function. From an ethical perspective, they work to ensure learner and instructor safety and, from a learning perspective, they increase the chances of meaningful learning. Many adult educators recognize arts-based approaches as holding rich potential to facilitate and foster embodied forms of learning, connecting learners in visceral and emotional ways with complex, abstract topics like globalization (Butterwick & Clover, 2013; Sanford & Mimick, 2013; Simola, 2012). Embodied experiential learning can add a pre-cognitive dimension to the material being studied; however, it is essential to approach this type of learning with great sensitivity and with intentional preparation to ensure the wellbeing, safety, and trust of those present. For instructors, adopting these approaches requires that they learn new, unfamiliar facilitation skills. It can also lead them to feel vulnerable in front of learners, since in guiding others through an arts-based experienced, instructors might find themselves negotiating unexpected emotional terrain. For students, arts-based approaches can provoke unexpected emotions. While arts-based approaches can foster significant learning that are difficult to access through traditional pedagogies, the risks must be acknowledged and attended to. Meaningful learning can be emotionally challenging, and as educators it is not our job to eliminate risk, but to engage " ideas and new imaginings…pushing beyond the familiar already-known and daring to experiment, taking risks, and making mistakes " (von Kotze & Small, 2013, p. 39). It is, however, our duty to determine the appropriate balance between risk that generates fruitful learning and risk that could lead to harmful stress for students and for ourselves. As educators, we must recognize that emotional and psychological safety is a priority (Butterwick & Clover, 2013; Hyland-Russell & Groen, 2013; Simola, 2012). By reflecting on our own facilitation experience and framing that within the literature, we can aspire to enact a rich but safe praxis. We are three doctoral students in the University of Calgary's Ed. D. program in the Adult Learning stream. During our most recent summer residency we had an opportunity to facilitate a