Frank Fuller
I have been an adjunct faculty member at Bloomsburg University since 2018.
I have also taught at Temple University in the Department of Political Science. Past affiliations include Villanova University, Rutgers Camden, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Philadelphia University, Holy Family University, Atlantic Cape Community College, and Chestnut Hill College. Other schools include Rowan University, Lincoln University in the History, Political Science and Philosophy Department, at Chestnut Hill College in the Department of History and Political Science, at West Chester University in the Political Science Department and at Cheyney University in the Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences. Some of my areas of interest include American politics, international relations, comparative politics, political theory, East Asian politics, and criminal justice. I obtained my PhD in Political Science from Clark Atlanta University, my MS in International Affairs from Georgia Tech, a BA in Politics from Oglethorpe University, and an AA in Liberal Arts from Young Harris College.
Supervisors: Dr. Robert DeJanes
I have also taught at Temple University in the Department of Political Science. Past affiliations include Villanova University, Rutgers Camden, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Philadelphia University, Holy Family University, Atlantic Cape Community College, and Chestnut Hill College. Other schools include Rowan University, Lincoln University in the History, Political Science and Philosophy Department, at Chestnut Hill College in the Department of History and Political Science, at West Chester University in the Political Science Department and at Cheyney University in the Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences. Some of my areas of interest include American politics, international relations, comparative politics, political theory, East Asian politics, and criminal justice. I obtained my PhD in Political Science from Clark Atlanta University, my MS in International Affairs from Georgia Tech, a BA in Politics from Oglethorpe University, and an AA in Liberal Arts from Young Harris College.
Supervisors: Dr. Robert DeJanes
less
InterestsView All (9)
Uploads
Books
Papers
Cambodia, it saved the people from further Khmer Rouge atrocities. Was humanitarianism justified for Cambodia or intentional, an excuse for Vietnam’s Communist government to expand? Vietnam’s invasion could qualify as legitimate humanitarian anti-KR intervention. Either opinion seemed controversial; the U.S. lauded Vietnam’s actions. Few dared oppose Pol Pot, though none supported his abysmal record. The KR tried infiltrating southern Vietnam in 1977, and border skirmishes had intensified. Vietnam, with Soviet support, sent 60,000 troops inside Cambodia’s border.
Cambodia’s mistake was trying to invade Vietnam to solidify KR power. Cambodians were relieved but opposed Vietnamese occupation, as 200,000 Vietnamese ended up patrolling Cambodia's countryside, with advisers clogging Cambodia’s government. Though Vietnam stopped the massacre, this was an example of a foreign power usurping a weaker one to gain ground for its own legitimacy. Because international humanitarian law had existed, with military intervention allowable in such a case, Vietnam felt obligated to intervene. In addition, if Vietnam had no history of border conflicts with
Cambodia or no massacre of Cambodians had materialize
d (though ethnic Vietnamese-Cambodians were also slaughtered), Vietnam may not have intervened. Overall, this
remains a complicated issue, one that brings no easy answer
centuries, where the U.S. intelligence community grew and evolved. In all of these contexts, the paper tries explaining how the U.S. can keep its secrets secret, which is particularly compelling today, where significant intelligence breaches from the lowest levels of the field compromise U.S. security. We sh
ow a broad analysis of how American alliances have been weakened and its methods and sources.
interaction between states and markets. Firms drive needs for global trade, but society within states promotes market changes. Some regulation of markets is desirable, while free markets must have some enforcement mechanism of rules to address inequalities and alleviate some of the side-effects of market
transition.