
Jeremy Morris
Open access to most papers via www.postsocialism.org
less
Related Authors
Noel B. Salazar
KU Leuven
Andreas Umland
National University of "Kyiv-Mohyla Academy"
Naim Kapucu
University of Central Florida
Andrea Peto
Central European University
Steve Sawyer
Syracuse University
Colin Williams
The University of Sheffield
David Seamon
Kansas State University
Ilan Talmud
University of Haifa
Remo Caponi
University of Cologne
Ebrahim Moosa
University of Notre Dame
InterestsView All (30)
Uploads
Papers by Jeremy Morris
In contrast to approaches which tend to classify informality as ‘bad’ or ‘transitional’ – meaning that modernity will make it disappear – this edited volume concentrates on dynamics and mechanisms to understand and explain informality, while also debating its relationship with the market and society.
The authors seek to explain informality beyond a mere monetaristic/economistic approach, rediscovering its interconnection with social phenomena to propose a more holistic interpretation of the meaning of informality and its influence in various spheres of life.
They do this by exploring the evolving role of informal practices in the post-socialist region, and by focusing on informality as a social organisation determinant but also looking at the way it reshapes emergent social resistance against symbolic and real political order(s).
This book was originally published as two special issues, of Caucasus Survey and the Journal of Contemporary Central and Eastern Europe.
traditional unions associated with state control; new alternative unions in Russia are particularly associated with political opposition and radicalism.
Analysis of recent (2008-present) activities to mobilise automotive workers in multinational and domestic owned plants.
Due to draconian labour laws, often activists resort to work-to-rule and indirect methods of resistance/protest.
At the same time their activities resemble both political entryism and left agitation in the face of a hostile and authoritarian state.
Is this a barometer of wider working-class power and opposition in post-socialism? What are the prospects for their semi-formal, semi-informal insurgency against neocapitalism?
If interested contact me at
ap (at) tlu.ee or just reply to this message
by the 20 of August at latest (better earlier). We would need the paper as soon as possible but we might be able to negotiate a bit
The national in everyday life. Identity and nation-building in post-socialist spaces
Editors: Abel Polese, Jeremy Morris, Emilia Pawlusz and Oleksandra Seliverstova
Overview and rationale
With this work we intend to explore, from a variety of perspectives and disciplines, how everyday practices become a meaningful and useful site for understanding socio-political engagements in the nation-building processes. The meaning of ‘everyday’ encompasses any kind of quotidian and ‘banal’ practices. These could be related to consumption, kinship, embodiment, mobility, games, clothing, Although there is a growing body of literature on informality and everyday practices in the post-socialist context, most of them do not sufficiently connect the micro and the macro or, in other words, do not necessarily explore the way micro processes at the local and/or everyday level may come to affect macro transformations and policy making at the national or regional level.
By complementing current works on identity construction from a bottom-up perspective, the current volume will focus on how, through everyday practices, individuals establish, negotiate and embed references to concepts of citizenship, statehood and national self-definition. Developing earlier insights into the study of everyday nationalism, initiated by Michael Billig (1995) and critically updated by Skey (2009) to encompass the need to take account of globalization, the editors are seek empirically-based studies of nationhood that emerge not from the state level, but in practices of everyday life among ordinary people and serve to 'materialize' the nation.
Questions perspective authors might want to engage with include (but are not limited to):
· How national identity could be explored through everyday acts, like consumption, leisure, food procurement and cooking, education of children, handcraft and arts, fashion, tourism, organisation of household.
· What are the dispositions and habituses that reveal shared or conflicting understandings of national identity.
· Perception and understanding of national belonging by ordinary people.
· How national characteristics are revealed in organization of public/private space, and movement through that space.
· Informal or spontaneous nation-building.
· The contrast between ‘hot’ and banal forms of everyday nationalism.
· The long durée effect of post-socialist transformation on nationalism.
The guiding questions that will be reflected in the assignment are as follows: What is the conservative turn in Russia? What has caused it? How has it affected political discourse around the family, gender roles, the upbringing of children? What kind of groups are identified as threats to this normative order? How does the government use this discourse to justify its foreign policy? How are race and religion relevant to conservatism and national identity? How ‘liberal’, is the liberal opposition to the government? How has the conservative turn been expressed in relations with neighbours of Russia?
Does your book take into account the role of middle range actors, such as intellectuals, in nation building processes? Intriguing question by Peter Rutland during the conference “Nationalism and the Market” at Universita La Sapienza, CERU
Time to reflect and give a more complex answer was short so I am uploading it here
Studies on nation building have extensively examined statist perspectives on nation building, which is what we initially tried to move away from with Isaacs and our “New tools and approaches” and that include the work of some middle actors.
However, intellectuals, civil society and other actors can still sign petitions, suggest interpretations and narratives on national identities that eventually make it to the headlines or national narratives.
With the current books we put at the centre of our inquiry events that will not make any noise and remain, in other words, invisible. Think of when a product becomes popular - Gangnam style in Korea or Turkish Cola some years ago, or unpopular - such as boycott of Russian products in Ukraine after the 2014 events. Even if they can be considered expression of national sentiments, their impact on a society will not be easy to grasp.
Companies will have figures and can estimate how much they have gained, or lost but they are not passive actors. Based on these figures they will have to decide on whether to stop, or keep on, selling a product. They might want to rebrand it or replace with some other product that suits the market better at some point.
But these choices can also embed a symbolic choice. Ethnic rebranding (see Zsombor Csaba’s paper) can contribute to reinforce a sense of national pride and thus, eventually, have a macro effect on identity construction. The message, in such case, would not use state official channels or middle actors but commercial ones. However, a simple marketing strategy might end up affecting the perception of national identity and various ethnic groups in a country might choose to consume, or not, a given product based on whether they support a given idea or not, on whether they try to integrate, or reject a national idea by ideologically consuming (or not) the nation (see Fox 2007).
We believe that it is worth paying attention at these phenomena, at the agency of common citizens and the way it creates synergies with market forces broadly defined (consumption, the culture industry, tourism) to be able to better understand some nuances in the construction of national identity in an era when these forces have become, symbolically or economically, as powerful as a state, at least in some cases.