Wikidata:Administrators/Confirm 2013/1

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

This was the voting page for administrator confirmations running from 23 Jan to 27 Jan. Voting ended at 23:59 (UTC) on 27 January 2013.

Wiki13 (talk • contribs • logs)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
Adminship extended permanently -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 00:03, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Nomination statement: Hello everyone, I'm Wiki13 and I was appointed as temporary admin in the early days of this wiki. The things I did in my period as temporary admin included deleting of duplicates, translating of tools in the MediaWiki namespace and blocking of spambots. Vandalism is now on a low level, but that will change when Wikidata phase 1 comes to the English Wikipedia. I would like, if I get reconfirmed as admin, help with that transition. I will use the tools the same way as I did until now. If I get too inactive on Wikidata because of being busy in real life or any other reason I will resign myself. --Wiki13 talk 16:27, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  1.  Support Merlissimo (talk) 00:08, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  2.  Support Ajraddatz (Talk) 00:15, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  3.  Support - decent amount of activity and trustworthy.--Jasper Deng (talk) 00:30, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  4.  Support -Techman224Talk 00:32, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  5.  Support --Rschen7754 00:34, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  6.  Reconfirm Wiki13 is one of the reasons that none of the other candidates have a very high number of logged actions. I think he's got some elaborate setup where whenever a deletion request goes up, it calls his cell phone or something. There's no other way to explain his response time. I honestly can't give any commentary on his interactions because I haven't seen them, but I certainly haven't come across or heard of any problems with this user. Sven Manguard Wha? 00:45, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    • Well, I'm not using any other device than my laptop right here. I'm just idling in countervandalism channel of Wikidata (#cvn-wikidataconnect). All edits to the RfD page are reported there. I'm not 100% on it all the time, as I also do SWMT work and stuff at my homewiki (Dutch Wikipedia). Regards, Wiki13 talk 15:17, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  7.  Support Per Sven. --Sannita - not just another it.wiki sysop 00:58, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  8.  Support --LadyInGrey (talk) 01:29, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  9.  Support, per all above. Érico Wouters msg 03:37, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  10.  Support Regards, — Moe Epsilon 04:12, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  11.  Support -- Keep with this user right, please! Wagino 20100516 (talk) 04:25, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  12.  Support --Stryn (talk) 05:25, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  13.  Support--Ymblanter (talk) 06:39, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  14.  Support--Wholle (talk) 07:42, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  15.  Support --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 09:29, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  16.  Support Per Sven. --Mange01 (talk) 10:44, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  17.  Support ShinePhantom (talk) 11:41, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  18.  Support Seewolf (talk) 12:35, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  19.  Support --Iste (D) 13:31, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  20.  Support per Sven. — PinkAmpers&(Je vous invite à me parler) 14:05, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  21.  Support --Matthiasb (talk) 14:59, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  22.  Support --Daniel Mietchen (talk) 15:14, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  23.  Support You are making an amazing work ! Tpt (talk) 16:07, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  24.  Support Courcelles (talk) 18:38, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  25.  Support sure IW 20:32, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  26.  Support Numerous log actions. J36miles (talk) 21:50, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  27.  Support Raystorm está aquí 13:15, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  28.  Support Nothing to say. Conny (talk) 17:32, 25 January 2013 (UTC).[reply]
  29.  Support Rzuwig► 18:00, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  30.  Support --Frigotoni ...i'm here; 18:06, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  31.  Support --Hosiryuhosi (talk) 23:39, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  32.  Support -- Bertrand GRONDIN  → (écrire) 05:29, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  33.  Support --Sk!d (talk) 16:34, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  34.  Support --Bene* talk 17:52, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  35.  Support — Arkanosis ✉ 18:41, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  36.  Support, of course. Lukas²³ talk in German Contribs 20:37, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  37.  Support Very active admin. Benoit Rochon (talk) 22:13, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  38.  Support--Jitrixis (talk) 08:39, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  39.  Support Raymond (talk) 09:57, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  40.  Support --Giftzwerg 88 (talk) 13:50, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  41.  Support --Shanmugamp7 (talk) 14:02, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  42.  Support --Daniel749 (talk) 15:03, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  43.  Support - Tiptoety talk 17:53, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Tpt (talk • contribs • logs)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
Adminship extended permanently -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 00:03, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Nomination statement:

I have created a gadget for Wikidata, slurpInterwiki, and I would like to keep my administrator right in order to be able to edit this gadget and to create new ones when the phase 2 will be launched. I'm busy IRL so I haven't contribute a lot to Wikidata but I'll try to work more on it when phase 2 will be deployed. I contribute also a few to the Wikibase extension. Between other things I've written Special:EntitiesWithoutLabel. Tpt (talk) 16:45, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  1.  Support Merlissimo (talk) 00:10, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  2.  Support Even with maintaining gadgets, user has hardly ever used the sysop flag. Ajraddatz (Talk) 00:23, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    Changing to support - Sven is right. He has always updated his gadget right after updates, so he does have a need for the tools. Ajraddatz (Talk) 00:54, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  3.  Neutral per Ajraddatz.--Jasper Deng (talk) 00:31, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  4.  Support Maintaining gadgets requires the sysop flag. These edits don't show up in logs, but they should be counted as sysop actions. Techman224Talk 00:46, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    But if you actually checked the edits, you'd find he's only had a couple of edits to the MediaWiki space within the last month. Ajraddatz (Talk) 00:49, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    Maybe that's all it takes to maintain it right now. I tend to view quality of admin actions as being equally, if not more important than quantity. But that's me personally, and we're allowed to have different metrics. Sven Manguard Wha? 00:51, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  5.  Reconfirm Per Techman224 for the use aspect, and per not seeing any red flags in the temperament aspect. Sven Manguard Wha? 00:51, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  6.  Support gadgets, and we don't have a lot of admin backlogs so far. --Rschen7754 00:53, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  7.  Support --Sannita - not just another it.wiki sysop 00:58, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  8.  Support, gadget maintenance. --Yair rand (talk) 01:00, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  9.  Support --LadyInGrey (talk) 01:30, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  10.  Support Érico Wouters msg 03:37, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  11.  Support Regards, — Moe Epsilon 04:12, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  12.  Support --Jarekt (talk) 04:20, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  13.  Support -- Keep with this user right, please! Wagino 20100516 (talk) 04:26, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  14.  Support because of tools. --Stryn (talk) 05:25, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  15.  Support --Wholle (talk) 08:06, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  16.  Support Active, and the admin activity level is reasonable (though not super-high).--Ymblanter (talk) 08:26, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  17.  Support ShinePhantom (talk) 11:42, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  18.  Support Seewolf (talk) 12:36, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  19.  Support --Iste (D) 13:37, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  20.  Support, though, as an interface editor, aren't you able to edit the MediaWiki namespace anyways? — PinkAmpers&(Je vous invite à me parler) 13:45, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    The main purpose of the global groups are global actions. As a global edit interface-editor, you have the ability to edit protected pages almost anywhere, but you do not always have the permission. -- Lavallen (block) 16:01, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes, I can edit protected pages everywhere but my interface editor right have been given to me only in order to help small Wikisource that have no administrators able to edit configurations messages. So, I think that I will abuse of my right if I change a lot of things in protected pages here. Tpt (talk) 16:15, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  21.  Support --Daniel Mietchen (talk) 14:54, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  22.  Support --Matthiasb (talk) 15:00, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  23.  Support --Wiki13 talk 15:18, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  24.  Support --Snaevar (talk) 18:24, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  25.  Support Courcelles (talk) 18:39, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  26.  Support --ValterVB (talk) 19:58, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  27.  Support IW 20:33, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  28.  Support --CENNOXX (talk) 02:07, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  29.  Support Thank you for great work. Conny (talk) 17:33, 25 January 2013 (UTC).[reply]
  30.  Support Rzuwig► 18:02, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  31.  Support --Frigotoni ...i'm here; 18:11, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  32.  Support -- Bertrand GRONDIN  → (écrire) 05:29, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  33.  Support – relatively inactive, but makes a strong, overriding case for retaining the tools anyway. —WFC— 11:11, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  34.  Support --Sk!d (talk) 16:34, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  35.  Support --Bene* talk 17:52, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  36.  Support — Arkanosis ✉ 18:41, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  37.  Support Lukas²³ talk in German Contribs 20:38, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  38.  Support Benoit Rochon (talk) 22:11, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  39.  Support Raoli (talk) 22:59, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  40.  Support--Jitrixis (talk) 08:41, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  41.  Support Raymond (talk) 09:57, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  42.  Support little activity means not inactivity. Just updating tools is also vaulable and trustworthy --Giftzwerg 88 (talk) 13:56, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  43.  Support --Shanmugamp7 (talk) 14:02, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  44.  Support --Daniel749 (talk) 15:07, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  45.  Support - Tiptoety talk 17:53, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  46.  Support --Eric-92 (talk) 23:27, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Superzerocool (talk • contribs • logs)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
Admin rights to be removed -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 00:03, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Nomination statement:

I was really active in early days on Wikidata, trying to import many articles of Spanish Wikipedia and translating the description in Spanish. In the begining of Wikidata, I haven't do administrative actions, but now (with some bots running), I see more duplicated articles and with sysop rights, I deleted some articles. As I think, this project needs sysops from every language (not only english speakers), I'm interested to continue with rights in Wikidata (I want to work in the phase 2 and confirm the data with sources in spanish countries: Chile, Argentina, España, etc.). Superzerocool (talk) 17:33, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  1.  Support Merlissimo (talk) 00:08, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  2.  Oppose I would love to have a wide variety of languages that admins can speak, but the candidate has not shown a need for the tools IMO. If Superzerocool becomes active again in the future and has a need for the sysop flag, I would be glad to support. Ajraddatz (Talk) 00:18, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  3.  Oppose per lack of activity; sysop isn't needed for doing translations.--Jasper Deng (talk) 00:32, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  4.  Support Should be more active, yes, but still involved in the project. --Rschen7754 03:14, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  5.  Oppose, basicaly per Ajraddatz. For me, five administrative actions in two months are not enough. Sorry and thanks for your efforts, Érico Wouters msg 03:37, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  6.  Support Regards, — Moe Epsilon 04:13, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  7.  Support -- He's not abusing authority, so no problem for keep this right. Wagino 20100516 (talk) 04:30, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  8.  Oppose per Ajraddatz. --Stryn (talk) 05:25, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  9.  Neutral He's not abusing authority, but as Ajraddatz says, not active enough. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 09:34, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  10.  Support Seewolf (talk) 12:36, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  11.  Support in the same spirit as my comment at #Guerillero (talk • contribs • log actions). If he isn't doing anything wrong, and there's no reason to believe that the standards for adminship will surpass the quality of his work in the near future, then the more admins the merrier, I say. — PinkAmpers&(Je vous invite à me parler) 14:02, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  12.  Support Per PinkAmpers. --Daniel Mietchen (talk) 15:08, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  13.  Neutral Per Rsrikanth05. --Wiki13 talk 15:19, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  14.  Neutral IW 20:34, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  15.  Support Per PinkAmpers. Raystorm está aquí 13:08, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  16.  Support Running bot, needs right to solve collisions. Thank you. Conny (talk) 17:35, 25 January 2013 (UTC).[reply]
  17.  Support -- Bertrand GRONDIN  → (écrire) 05:29, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  18.  Oppose per lack of activity. We shouldn't even consider inactive or semi-active admins until *after* we have a concrete inactivity policy. —WFC— 11:04, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  19.  Support — Arkanosis ✉ 18:41, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  20.  Oppose. Sysop rights don't seem to be needed with only 5 log actions. Lukas²³ talk in German Contribs 20:40, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  21.  Support Raymond (talk) 09:57, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  22.  Neutral not realy convinced. --Giftzwerg 88 (talk) 14:02, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  23.  Neutral --Daniel749 (talk) 15:07, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  24.  Oppose - Inactive. Tiptoety talk 19:08, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Sannita (talk • contribs • logs)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
Adminship extended permanently -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 00:03, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Nomination statement:

I am one of the biggest supporters in the Italian community of this project, and I'm also an admin on Italian Wikipedia (which on Jan 30 will be the second/third beta tester, along with Hebrew Wikipedia). As all the other temp admins, I did little until now since there's a low level of vandalism, but I do share the idea that vandalisms will raise when we'll launch phase 2. Also, I worked a lot with items from it.wikipedia, I'm still trying to do my best with the itwiki import task force (there's such an awful lot of work that one can only try to do his/her best!), and I also involved in translations of guidelines and other useful stuff. Hope to continue to be useful. :) --Sannita - not just another it.wiki sysop 11:49, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  1.  Support Merlissimo (talk) 00:08, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  2.  Support Active and trusted, hasn't used the tools too much but contributions show that they are on a lot. Ajraddatz (Talk) 00:20, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  3.  Weak support - low sysop activity but indication of need.--Jasper Deng (talk) 00:33, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  4.  Support --LadyInGrey (talk) 01:32, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  5.  Support --Rschen7754 03:05, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  6.  Weak support, per Jasper Deng. Érico Wouters msg 03:37, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  7.  Support Regards, — Moe Epsilon 04:13, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  8.  Support -- Good admin here. Wagino 20100516 (talk) 04:32, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  9.  Support --Stryn (talk) 05:25, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  10.  Support --Wholle (talk) 08:00, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  11.  Support --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 09:30, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  12.  Support User is active, admin activity level is reasonable, and indeed we need an Italian-speaking admin anyway.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:40, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  13.  Support --Paperoastro (talk) 09:42, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  14.  Support Seewolf (talk) 12:37, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  15.  Support --Iste (D) 13:32, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  16.  Support --Matthiasb (talk) 15:02, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  17.  Support --Daniel Mietchen (talk) 15:03, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  18.  Support --Wiki13 talk 15:20, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  19.  Stöder -- Lavallen (block) 16:48, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  20.  Support Courcelles (talk) 18:40, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  21.  Support --ValterVB (talk) 19:59, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  22.  Support --Rasmus 28 (talk) 20:23, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  23.  Support IW 20:35, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  24.  Support Rzuwig► 18:06, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  25.  Support Sure, --Frigotoni ...i'm here; 18:09, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  26.  Support --Eric-92 (talk) 22:51, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  27.  Support Techman224Talk 05:11, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  28.  Support -- Bertrand GRONDIN  → (écrire) 05:29, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  29.  Support --Bene* talk 17:52, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  30.  Support — Arkanosis ✉ 18:41, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  31.  Weak support per Jasper Deng. Lukas²³ talk in German Contribs 20:42, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  32.  Support Benoit Rochon (talk) 22:14, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  33.  Support Raoli (talk) 22:58, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  34.  Support Raymond (talk) 09:57, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  35.  Support --Giftzwerg 88 (talk) 14:05, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  36.  Support --Daniel749 (talk) 15:08, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Merlissimo (talk • contribs • logs)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
Adminship extended permanently -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 00:03, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Nomination statement:

I am supporting wikidata since summer 2012. I have done many testings and reported many bugs and feature requests to the developers team. Since June 2012 i have extended my interwikibot MerlIwBot for importing wikidata items. It was first working on the test wiki for several months and after wikidata.org was live here, too. Improving my bots, solving interwiki conflicts and correcting wikidata item is currently the main work i am doing on wikidata.org. Having admin rights makes it easier for me to to do these tasks (for the same reason i am having global editinterface).
Like the other wikis where i am admin my main focus beside the langlinks is the technical wiki administration part. I'll also try to be more active on bot flag requests. Merlissimo (talk) 15:48, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  1.  Support Kolja21 (talk) 00:22, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  2.  Support Ajraddatz (Talk) 00:24, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  3.  Support --Sk!d (talk) 00:32, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  4.  Reconfirm - Merlissimo might not be the most active admin in terms of tool use, however taking into account a) the valuable work he and his bots have done for the project, b) that he is a sane and competent person, c) that his interactions with other users are fine, and d) that most admin actions are duplication deletions, which have a half life of about 27 seconds on this project before they're handled, I have no issues with reconfirming this candidate. Sven Manguard Wha? 00:56, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  5.  Support - demonstrates need and trustworthiness.--Jasper Deng (talk) 00:43, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  6.  Support Along with Wiki13, I can't think of a better admin. --Sannita - not just another it.wiki sysop 00:58, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  7.  Support --Rschen7754 01:05, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  8.  Support --LadyInGrey (talk) 01:31, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  9.  Support Érico Wouters msg 03:37, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  10.  Support Regards, — Moe Epsilon 04:14, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  11.  Support -- Why not? Wagino 20100516 (talk) 04:33, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  12.  Support --Stryn (talk) 05:25, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  13.  Support --Wholle (talk) 08:10, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  14.  Support As per Sven. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 09:31, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  15.  Support --Paperoastro (talk) 09:43, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  16.  Support, no problems --Ymblanter (talk) 09:44, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  17.  Support --Leyo 10:54, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  18.  Support ShinePhantom (talk) 11:42, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  19.  Support Seewolf (talk) 12:37, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  20.  Support --Iste (D) 13:33, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  21.  stöder Lavallen (block) 13:36, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  22.  Support — PinkAmpers&(Je vous invite à me parler) 13:39, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  23.  Support --Daniel Mietchen (talk) 14:51, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  24.  Support --Matthiasb (talk) 15:04, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  25.  Support --Wiki13 talk 15:20, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  26.  Support Tanks for your bot and your gadgets. You are making an amazing work ! Tpt (talk) 16:07, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  27.  Support Courcelles (talk) 18:40, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  28.  Support --ValterVB (talk) 19:59, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  29.  Support IW 20:36, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  30.  Support --CENNOXX (talk) 02:07, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  31.  Support Carol.Christiansen (talk) 02:54, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  32.  Support -- feuerst – talk 16:21, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  33.  Support Thank you for the great work. Conny (talk) 17:36, 25 January 2013 (UTC).[reply]
  34.  Support Rzuwig► 18:08, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  35.  Support --Frigotoni ...i'm here; 18:10, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  36.  Support -- Bertrand GRONDIN  → (écrire) 05:29, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  37.  Support no brainer. —WFC— 11:09, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  38.  Support -- Marcus Cyron (talk) 16:23, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  39.  Support --Bene* talk 17:52, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  40.  Support — Arkanosis ✉ 18:41, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  41.  Support, no question. Lukas²³ talk in German Contribs 20:42, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  42.  Support Benoit Rochon (talk) 22:15, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  43.  Support --Jitrixis (talk) 08:42, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  44.  Support Raymond (talk) 09:57, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  45.  Support --Shanmugamp7 (talk) 14:02, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  46.  Support--Giftzwerg 88 (talk) 14:06, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  47.  Support --Daniel749 (talk) 15:08, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Guerillero (talk • contribs • logs)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
Admin rights to be removed -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 00:03, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Nomination statement:

If you look at my contributions, you would think that I am not active. And that is correct. I could make excuses for my inactivity, running for arbcom and such, but I highly doubt that will make any difference. What I have to offer, if I was allowed to continue my adminship here, is the ability to be a long sighted admin. I try to read a broad range of the forming policy pages and discussions on a regular basis. Will I log hundreds of admin actions and thousands of edits, no. But, I think that I would be a net positive to the project. If this tanks in the first 24 hours, I will snow close this and turn over my mop at the stewards noticeboard --Guerillero | Talk 17:34, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  1.  Oppose - While I agree that you'd be a net asset to Wikidata, I would not like adminship to be something that everyone collects and never uses. Adminship should be for those who need it. Ajraddatz (Talk) 00:15, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  2.  Oppose - I like you as an admin on Wikipedia and a good user in general. But showing a need for the tools is also good, and you don't need a mop for helping to craft policies, which is highly appreciated.--Jasper Deng (talk) 00:28, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  3.  Reconfirm There are some votes that are made based out of compelling evidence and sound logic. Other votes are made because you've worked with someone for a long time and have a great deal of trust and respect for them. My support for this candidate is unabashedly the latter. Sven Manguard Wha? 01:02, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  4.  Oppose admin con escasa/nula actividad. --LadyInGrey (talk) 01:22, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  5.  Support basically per Sven. --Rschen7754 03:15, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  6.  Support, per Sven. But try to be more active. Érico Wouters msg 03:37, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  7.  Support Regards, — Moe Epsilon 04:14, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  8.  Support -- He's not abusing authority, so no problem for keep this right. Wagino 20100516 (talk) 04:34, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  9.  Neutral, not active enough that I could support, but I don't have any reason to oppose. --Stryn (talk) 05:25, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  10.  Support, giving quick response, was rather active last fall. Mange01 (talk) 12:27, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  11.  Support Seewolf (talk) 12:39, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  12.  Support We can deal with a bloat of inactive admins at a later point in time, if necessary. For now, I see no reason to revoke the sysopship of contributors in very high standing. — PinkAmpers&(Je vous invite à me parler) 13:42, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  13.  Neutral Per Stryn. --Daniel Mietchen (talk) 15:18, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  14.  Neutral I both agree with Stryn and Jasper Deng. --Wiki13 talk 15:22, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  15.  Neutral IW 20:30, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  16.  Support Rzuwig► 18:11, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  17.  Support -- Bertrand GRONDIN  → (écrire) 05:29, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  18.  Oppose I was tempted to go the same way as Sven, based on previous interactions at enwiki, but that would be systemic bias. I do not believe that we should hand the tools to any inactive editor, regardless of calibre, until we have an established inactivity policy. We only have a vague, undefined promise of one at the moment. —WFC— 11:07, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  19.  Neutral --Bene* talk 17:52, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  20.  Support — Arkanosis ✉ 18:41, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  21.  Oppose, see Ajraddatz. Lukas²³ talk in German Contribs 20:45, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  22.  Support Raymond (talk) 09:57, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  23.  Support --Iste (D) 11:03, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  24.  Support Carol.Christiansen (talk) 12:26, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    Do you oppose or support?--Jasper Deng (talk) 19:49, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    Support. Sorry for my mistake. Regards, Carol.Christiansen (talk) 10:09, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  25.  Support--Giftzwerg 88 (talk) 14:28, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  26.  Neutral --Daniel749 (talk) 15:11, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  27.  Support - I see no reason not to (PinkAmpersand) ·Add§hore· Talk To Me! 23:47, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  28.  Oppose He obviously does not need the sysop status/tools. Fabrice Ferrer (talk) 23:52, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Romaine (talk • contribs • logs)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
Adminship extended permanently -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 00:03, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Nomination statement:

I am active and willing to remain active and help a hand where I see/can with admin tasks. Currently I still keep an eye on the recent changes, request page and category to help the project. I am a experienced user with technical skills in templates, coding and more. Romaine (talk) 00:11, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  1.  Support Has used the sysop access less than ten times since being flagged, so no need for the tools I'd say. Ajraddatz (Talk) 00:19, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    • Each time I edit at the project I check the category for items to be deleted, as well as the request for deletions page, and I go through the recent changes to see if any page is mistakenly been created without content. I am happy if I can help, but I will not do log actions only for log counts and if other users are faster than me, it is fine. The goal is to maintain the project, and as this project seems relatively well developed, not that much entries are wrong, so we all are around the same small fishing water. I requested the admin flag for being able to help, with interwikis, and as more data will be added to the project, certainly concerning infoboxes and population data (as that is currently my work on the Dutch Wikipedia), I still want be able to help then. If I currently encounter non complete items I try to complete them otherwise I delete them, and with editing the thousands of pages I haven't seen much items with problems. Romaine (talk) 00:48, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
      • Change to support - further looking at Romaine's edits have convinced me to change. (s)He is obvious active, but with a few admins taking all of the work it's hard to blame (him|her) for not getting hundreds of deletions in. Ajraddatz (Talk) 00:58, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  2.  Neutral - I trust Romaine but have concerns over activity.--Jasper Deng (talk) 00:36, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  3.  Support --LadyInGrey (talk) 01:33, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  4.  Support --Rschen7754 03:16, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  5.  Support, same comment that gave to Guerillero. Érico Wouters msg 03:37, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  6.  Support Regards, — Moe Epsilon 04:15, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  7.  Support -- Yes! Wagino 20100516 (talk) 04:38, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  8.  Support --Stryn (talk) 05:25, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  9.  Support--Wholle (talk) 07:48, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  10.  Support Seewolf (talk) 12:39, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  11.  Support The general activity is high, and the admin activity is fine. Do not see any reasons not to support.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:51, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  12.  Support--Sannita - not just another it.wiki sysop 13:56, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  13.  Support Activity level seems reasonable to me. --Daniel Mietchen (talk) 15:05, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  14.  Support Merlissimo (talk) 19:32, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  15.  Support IW 20:37, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  16.  Support --CENNOXX (talk) 02:07, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  17.  Neutral. I'm hesitant to support an administrator who doesn't seem to want to follow community consensus-backed policy. --Yair rand (talk) 05:13, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  18.  Support Conny (talk) 17:37, 25 January 2013 (UTC).[reply]
  19.  Support Rzuwig► 18:11, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  20.  Support Techman224Talk 05:09, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  21.  Support -- Bertrand GRONDIN  → (écrire) 05:29, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  22.  Support -- Marcus Cyron (talk) 16:25, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  23.  Support — Arkanosis ✉ 18:41, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  24.  Neutral, did not really need the rights, but still active. Lukas²³ talk in German Contribs 20:48, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  25.  Support Benoit Rochon (talk) 22:12, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  26.  Support Raymond (talk) 09:57, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  27.  Support --Shanmugamp7 (talk) 14:02, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  28.  Support--Giftzwerg 88 (talk) 14:27, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  29.  Support --Daniel749 (talk) 15:12, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

SarahStierch (talk • contribs • logs)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
Admin rights to be removed -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 00:03, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, yes, it's obvious I'm not that active right now. I didn't know I'd have to undergo a re-vote or I wouldn't have applied to be an admin at the beginning. I am waiting for the second phase (?) for the project - I've gotten a bit bored with the tasks and there isn't enough action for me to feel like I'm really useful at this point. SarahStierch (talk) 04:13, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  1.  Oppose User is not even active enough to create this, and has little need for the sysop tools. Ajraddatz (Talk) 00:16, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  2.  Oppose with regret, solely due to inactivity. Without prejudice should the candidate return to activity. --Rschen7754 00:27, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  3.  Weak oppose per Ajraddatz.--Jasper Deng (talk) 00:35, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  4.  Support Her overall level of activity isn't that low for someone that has to balance multiple projects. I'd would have supported this if she had put up a reconfirmation message. Sven Manguard Wha? 00:55, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    Moved from neutral to support. Sven Manguard Wha? 07:14, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  5.  Oppose usuaria con escasa y/o nula actividad. --LadyInGrey (talk) 01:23, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  6.  Oppose, lack of activity. Thanks for your efforts, Érico Wouters msg 03:37, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  7.  Neutral pending return. Regards, — Moe Epsilon 04:15, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  8.  Oppose -- Per Érico Wouters above, at least for now. Wagino 20100516 (talk) 04:41, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  9.  Oppose, not active enough. --Stryn (talk) 05:25, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  10.  Oppose User might be active on other wikis, but not very active here, and we need active sysops. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 09:32, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  11.  Support Per my above comment at #Guerillero (talk • contribs • log actions). For those of you not active on enwp, or who haven't read through all of en:WP:200 out of boredom, it's worth noting that Sarah had an unopposed RFA, which is considerably rarer there than it is here. — PinkAmpers&(Je vous invite à me parler) 13:53, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    This is not Wikipedia. I don't think that what a Wikidata user does on one of our sister projects is particularly relevant to their adminship vote here on Wikidata now. --Yair rand (talk) 05:16, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    I would consider adminship on any other project a substantial (but not absolute) indication of trust.--Jasper Deng (talk) 05:33, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    On principle, I don't really agree with that - smaller wiki adminships don't undergo as much scrutiny, for example. (I'm not saying that all small wiki admins are untrustworthy, but I'm saying this isn't a great comparison). --Rschen7754 05:49, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    So would I, but I think it's still not really much of an argument in favor of adminship here. --Yair rand (talk) 05:39, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    The entire point of having confirmations now was to judge candidates based on their contributions to Wikidata. If we can't achieve this yet, then I'd vote for keeping adminship temporary until we can. Simply put, IMO administrators should be judged by their work here and not elsewhere. If they are not using the tools here, I see no reason why they should keep them, regardless of whether or not they collect hats elsewhere. Ajraddatz (Talk) 12:22, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    Exactly. While enwp contribs might indicate that the user is a highly trusted one, it is the activity on the local wiki/wiki in question that needs to be taken into consideration. Three months ago, global contribs could've made a difference as Wikidata was an infant, but today Wikidata is quite large and has managed to build up it's own community proper and thus local activity must precede global activity. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 14:30, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  12.  Support Seewolf (talk) 14:34, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  13.  Support Don't see that she's done anything wrong with the tools, and activity level seems reasonable. --Daniel Mietchen (talk) 15:13, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  14.  Support Useful person to have on board if activity hots up. --Filceolaire (talk) 15:40, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  15.  Neutral --Wiki13 talk 15:41, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  16.  Oppose I am afraid I was right when I opposed first. Pls feel free to reapply when some activity starts which you find less boring.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:42, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  17.  Neutral IW 20:38, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  18.  Support — Arkanosis ✉ 18:41, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  19.  Oppose, incactive. Lukas²³ talk in German Contribs 20:49, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  20.  Support Raymond (talk) 09:57, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  21.  Support--Giftzwerg 88 (talk) 14:22, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  22.  Neutral --Daniel749 (talk) 15:14, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Restu20 (talk • contribs • logs)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
Admin rights to be removed -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 00:03, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  1.  Oppose Seems to have been inactive since mid-December, and only rare use of the sysop flag before that. Ajraddatz (Talk) 00:24, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  2.  Neutral per Ajraddatz, going neutral because of some activity on itwiki with regard to Wikidata.--Jasper Deng (talk) 00:38, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  3.  Oppose not even around to run for reconfirmation. --Rschen7754 00:40, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  4.  Oppose usuario con escasa y/o nula actividad. --LadyInGrey (talk) 01:24, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  5.  Support Restu20 made some administrative actions and I think he can come back to be more active. Érico Wouters msg 03:37, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  6.  Neutral pending return. Regards, — Moe Epsilon 04:15, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  7.  Neutral -- Trusted user but no longer active. If you're most active again so I will support you for next time. Wagino 20100516 (talk) 04:51, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  8.  Neutral, user did good work at the start of project, but now he is not active enough here. --Stryn (talk) 05:25, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  9.  Support Per Erico. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 09:31, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  10.  Oppose per Ajraddatz. Mange01 (talk) 12:34, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  11.  Neutral pending return. While I've said elsewhere on this page that I don't think we should deny reconfirmation to admins in good standing elsewhere, I think there is a minimum standard of activity required to retain sysopship. Barring any conduct-related reasons to oppose, though, I imagine I'll support if Restu20 posts a statement. — PinkAmpers&(Je vous invite à me parler) 13:57, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  12.  Oppose Willing to change to support upon return. --Daniel Mietchen (talk) 14:56, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  13.  Neutral --Wiki13 talk 15:42, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  14.  Oppose I do not see any indication that the user is interested in keeping admin flag.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:44, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  15.  Oppose per Rschen7754 and Ymblanter.--Snaevar (talk) 18:09, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  16.  Oppose IW 20:39, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  17.  Neutral Waitn for statement. Conny (talk) 17:38, 25 January 2013 (UTC). Maybe he is oon holidays? Conny (talk) 12:13, 26 January 2013 (UTC).[reply]
  18.  Oppose Almost 4 days now, and no response. No active use for tools. Techman224Talk 04:59, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  19.  Oppose no response --Bene* talk 17:52, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  20.  Neutral Nothing against the candidate, actually I'd probably have supported him if he had requested the tools again, but until then, there is no indication wether he wants to keep the tools or not, so neutral. — Arkanosis ✉ 18:41, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  21.  Oppose, no edits since December 19. Lukas²³ talk in German Contribs 20:51, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  22.  Neutral Trusted user but not active --Jitrixis (talk) 08:49, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  23.  Neutral --Shanmugamp7 (talk) 14:02, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  24.  Oppose Willing to change to support upon return.--Giftzwerg 88 (talk) 14:26, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  25.  Oppose --Daniel749 (talk) 15:13, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  26.  Oppose - Inactive. Tiptoety talk 17:52, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
Retrieved from "https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Wikidata:Administrators/Confirm_2013/1&oldid=2029730683"