Wikidata:Administrators' noticeboard: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Older edit Newer edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 17:48, 5 March 2015

Administrators' noticeboard

This is a noticeboard for matters requiring administrator attention.

If you wish for something to be deleted, please use Wikidata:Requests for deletions.
If you want to report a bug in Wikidata software, please use Wikidata:Report a technical problem or Phabricator.
Matters not requiring administrator action should be raised at Project chat.
Matters that may involve CheckUser should be raised at Wikidata:Requests for checkuser.
To report vandalism on wikidata: please click here.
Please add {{section resolved|1=~~~~}} to resolved sections.

IRC channel: #wikidata^connect

Translate this header box!

Start a new discussion

If you are a user who has a request for removal of non-public personal information, please note that details should not be posted in public. Email oversightwikidata.org or a local oversighter privately.

If you are requesting the restoration of a deleted item, please be sure to explain how the item meets our notability criteria. If you are claiming that the item "can be described using serious and publicly available references", please list some of those references in your request.

On this page, old discussions are archived. An overview of all archives can be found at this page's archive index. The current archive is located at 2024/11.

Requests for deletions

high

_{~152 open requests for deletions.}

Attention administrators: This message is appearing because there are more than 100 open requests at Wikidata:Requests for deletions. Please consider helping with the backlog.

Global Pushing

continuation of Wikidata:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive/2014/10#Global pushing?

see Q18729000 and all linked Wikipedia articles. Is it possible to block these IP's for a longer time perdiod? --Pasleim (talk) 13:46, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The user(s) created articles in at least 24 25 wikis:

--Pasleim (talk) 09:59, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I asked the stewards to delete them since this is clearly cross-wiki spam.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:58, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

All but two have now been deleted, those two remaining because the wikis they are on have local admins which can handle them. Those should be gone soon. Ajraddatz (talk) 17:37, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Started again; before they're merged (and later hopefully deleted), see Q18785011. Jared Preston (talk) 11:45, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bump. He/She/It is still at it. The stewards need to do something about this! Jared Preston (talk) 16:30, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a reason why we don't merge Q18729000 and Q18785011 now? Of course, that wouldn't help with the spamming attack, but it would help keep Wikidata cleaner. Is there a benefit in temporarily having two items when it comes to watching the user's activities? --YMS (talk) 16:48, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No benefit, no. Merged them now. Maybe there are more items out there too... Jared Preston (talk) 20:21, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I hope a steward will soon consider this request --Pasleim (talk) 21:13, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A new addition. Jared Preston (talk) 18:40, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And there is another one.--Vyom25 (talk) 10:01, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Have taken some actions, though prior example says that the egotists will be back with variations. Can I ask that further reports be made to m:Vandalism reports. There are a number of tools that stewards and meta admins can utilise to manage this sort of thing. — billinghurst sDrewth 10:13, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have been through and deleted the remaining pages crosswiki for the small wikis, and pushed jaWP I have removed the links here, and requested deletion of the page. I will hazard a guess that they will be back with a variation, so please notify as above. — billinghurst sDrewth 10:23, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! Jared Preston (talk) 12:42, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Next round. --Succu (talk) 09:48, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As suggested, I've filed the issue at meta:Vandalism reports. I've merged the most recent item to the older one and blocked the IP for a month, not that it will make any difference... Jared Preston (talk) 10:41, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have deleted mrWP and again asked jaWP to delete their page. I note that the WD page still exists, and there is a redirect from Q18964885. Just keep deleting them. To note that I have a global filter which does flag the name, but maybe I will need to whack it harder, though will wait a few days. — billinghurst sDrewth 12:49, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Jared Preston, billinghurst, Ajraddatz: Another case. Matěj Suchánek (talk) 18:18, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to say "report this at meta", but it seems they don't give much of a toss over there after nearly a fortnight without action. I can't delete the Wikipedia entries, only a steward can. Maybe billinghurst would do the honours? After all, he's the only nice guy that's helped at all in this matter. Jared Preston (talk) 18:22, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There's not actually much more what could be done on Meta... "Javad Ramezani" is already blacklisted on Meta, so it's not possible to create pages using that title. But now he is using different alphabets, so it's hard to catch them by filter. --Stryn (talk) 18:34, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's not that we don't give a toss, it's that we can't act on most of the pages that are created. If the wiki has local admins, then we can only tag them for deletion and wait for local admins - something anyone can do. Either that, or we invoke the "crosswiki" clause that allows us to act on projects with active admins, and risk people being very upset at us... No way to win! I've tagged the kmwiki page for deletion; the siwiki page has already been tagged and the others deleted. Ajraddatz (talk) 21:39, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Stewards done nothing? Furthest from the reality. Spam filter, deletion requests, deletions, and protections crosswiki. Have we got everything? Probably not. — billinghurst sDrewth 05:41, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Property proposal closures: backlog

Could we have some admin attention at Wikidata:Property proposal/Unsorted (particulalry #YourPaintings venue/collection identifier), please? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:17, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On it. --George (Talk · Contribs · CentralAuth · Log) 11:18, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for those you closed, but we still have a considerable backlog, some several months old, including the example above. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:08, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ruumis (Buffy, vampyyrintappaja)

Hello, fi:Ruumis (Buffy, vampyyrintappaja) was recently accepted as a good article in fi.wikipedia, but for some reason I can't edit the Wikidata page of the article. Can someone edit the badge in there? Thanks. --URunICon (talk) 14:43, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done, thanks for letting us know. --Stryn (talk) 14:46, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Links for communication between categories

Dear admins, sorry for the bad English.

I ask You to take an action that I can't run due to lack of authority. In Russian Wikipedia has a category Категория:Методы очистки газовых смесей, which correspond on the English Wikipedia Category:Solid-gas separation. I ask You to make the necessary links for communication between categories.

With respect AlexChirkin (talk) 10:22, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@AlexChirkin:

Done. In the future, if you have the same problem, you can see Help:Merge#Automatic merge. Jon Harald Søby (talk) 12:12, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

1991 UNCAF Nations Cup

The page has finally been given GA status. For some reason, I can't change it myself. Could an admin go ahead and give the GA badge to the other different language versions of the article? Thanks! Hawaiifive0 (talk) 18:41, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What article exactly? I'll go ahead and add it :) --George (Talk · Contribs · CentralAuth · Log) 18:44, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry...I forgot to copy the link. It is there now. :P Hawaiifive0 (talk) 18:51, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done :) --George (Talk · Contribs · CentralAuth · Log) 18:54, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

72.10.124.210

72.10.124.210 — valdalism, it would be good to hide some of the edits. Thanks, — Adavyd (talk) 20:02, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Will hide the offensive revisions, one second. --George (Talk · Contribs · CentralAuth · Log) 20:03, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Can only find one edit that could be deleted, and that may need oversighter attention. --George (Talk · Contribs · CentralAuth · Log) 20:07, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Revdelled. --George (Talk · Contribs · CentralAuth · Log) 20:10, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks… But do you think that this one and this one are acceptable? Just look at the edit descriptions in the list of contributions… — Adavyd (talk) 20:14, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think it's severe enough to call for Revdel personally, although if another admin disagrees, please delete it. --George (Talk · Contribs · CentralAuth · Log) 20:16, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Floribella (telenovela brasileira)

This article is good at the pt.wikipedia, but I can't save the edit here. LuizM (talk) 20:22, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done --George (Talk · Contribs · CentralAuth · Log) 20:23, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

IP

are this edits acceptable? [1] ?--Rippitippi (talk) 01:44, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see anything meaningful in those pages, so I nuked all of them.--Jasper Deng (talk) 02:26, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikibooks mapping to Wikidata items - DEPLOYMENT IS TUESDAY

Please take a look at Wikidata:Wikibooks/Development, and give your feedback on how we should handle Wikibooks interwiki links. The deployment is this Tuesday, so we really need to get this in order very quickly! Rschen7754, sent by --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:18, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Messing with religion or worldview (P140) and several main items

@Genium: has started some sort of campaign against the use of Catholicism (Q1841) as a statement for religion or worldview (P140), because «Catholicism is not a religion». I have tried to explain to him why his edits are wrong, but he has reverted me, in several items without making much sense. For instance, he reuses this link as a reference even when I pointed out that it does not refers to Catholicism (Q1841) but to Catholic Church (Q9592). Referring to the value type "religion (Q9174)", Property talk:P140 states that this «property should use items as value that contain property instance of (P31). On these, the value for instance of (P31) should be an item that uses subclass of (P279) with value religion (Q9174) (or a subclass thereof)», so that is precisely the case of Catholicism (well, at least before Genium's reinterpretation). Anyway, all his recent edits seem disruptive to me, but I can not act on it because I am involved. Could someone else pay attention to this issue? The user had the option to discuss this with me or in the property talk page, but instead chose to start an edit war, in which I will not take part. Andreasm ^{háblame / just talk to me} 01:10, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is no campaign here, Catholicism is not a new religion created from Christianism, it's an instance of Catholic Church. The meaning of Religion and Church is different, so I propose to create a new property to distinguish the two : church. genium ⟨✉⟩ 03:29, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Massive incorrect inserts of drama television series (Q1366112)

drama television series (Q1366112) is specifically a television genre, but GZWDer (flood) massively inserted it as instance of (P31) in several hundreds of elements. The mere insertion of it in that property should already be incorrect, as it should be inserted as genre (P136), if anywhere, but it also has been inserted in many elements that are not even television productions, like novels, manga, etc, and also on television productions that are not dramas at all (perhaps as a confusion with Japanese television drama (Q399811), which has nothing to do with drama television series (Q1366112), and which also would be incorrect in many items as noted above). This was done around a week ago, last February 16th, but I discovered it just now. The user (which I suppose is a bot, as it has been doing nearly 500 edits each 4 minutes) has not edited since then and the bot's controller's user page reads "Semi-Retired", that's why I came here in the first place. What should be done?--Manbemel (talk) 02:25, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Manbemel, please bring this up on GZWDer's talk page first. If you don't get a response you can always come here. Multichill (talk) 08:54, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Manbemel:

P31: I'm going to fix it by autolist, but currently https://tools.wmflabs.org/magnustools/ is broken and I'm going to do that later. If this page is fixed you can also do it.
Inserts in novels, manga, etc: Several articles' topic is both novels or manga and television dramas based on it. If there're many such item I'm going to remove these incorrect statements.

--GZWDer (talk) 10:35, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fusionar

Giuseppina Huguet (Q5565552) <--> Josefina Huguet (Q11033883). Laura Fiorucci (talk) 13:50, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done--Ymblanter (talk) 15:50, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fusionar 2

Q1736029 <--> Q9554572. Laura Fiorucci (talk) 21:33, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done You can use Merge gadget to do yourself. --ValterVB (talk) 21:52, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Csigabi's constant arbitrary actions

I am calling attention to Administrators' noticeboard that editor "Csigabi" always abuses of his editor's rights because he does constant arbitrary actions that he makes quasi for the benefit of Wikidata but in fact these actions are arbitary and they serve only his personal revenge. Csigabi's last action was to protect "Flóra Kádár" article until 15 March 2015 because of edit warring but this justification was only an arbitrary and unrealistic motivation. Csigabi is an completely inappropriate for his task, service as an administrator because he violates the most important norm, rule for the admins to be, to remain neutral and he always acts for his favourites, his friends and he always wants to punish his putative enemies. I would like to remind the administrators that there was a debate between Csigabi and me and he has accused me to do vandalism and it has become clear that his accusation was false. So he has had no right to protect the page named above, I've already justified that the dispute is personal between the administrator named above and me and Csigabi has just begun to pick a quarrel between us. I myself ask other administrators warn him to his rights and they who has viewed, monitored my former editings can have experienced that I am a good and useful editor and I am working for the benefit of Wikipedia and Wikidata and the administator who is not neutral, is completely inappropriate for his task, service as an administrator. Thank you for your kind attention!Borgatya (talk) 13:00, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Csigabi, your opinion on this? Matěj Suchánek (talk) 13:15, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Matěj Suchánek:His incoherent words speak for themselves. He went into edit war with another editor, who, being aware that I am and administrator here asked advice. So I protected the article to prevent further edit warring, knowing all too well that he would not stop. Please have a look at this edit history where he, though did not reverted, simpy overwrote the same editor's good faith edit. He even reverts/overwrites the articles to the wrong version in order to have his presumed truth justified. These kind of his edits are definitely not good faith edits. If you look at his edit history on February 26 between 13:14 and 13:26 you can see it yourself that he simply reverted a great number of my edits, not because they were wrong but because they were not his. As a matter of fact, being a Hungarian native, I follow the edits of huwiki editors on Wikidata. I correct their mistakes, give them advice, request changes, etc. All of them listen to me and follow the advice I give. I tried to have a discussion with him on certain formal requirements of his edits so that they comply with the guidelines of Wikidata (e.g. begin descriptions with a lowercase letter except when uppercase would normally be required). Now please have a look at the history of Borgatya's talk page. In addition to the foul language he used you can see that he simply reverted my requests, I doubt if he had ever read them. For your information: this guy on huwiki, under a different user name, has been blocked about two dozen times for the exact same reason. It seems that he pursues the same attitude here. --Csigabi (talk) 16:36, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

need help

please add cdo:Dĕ̤ng Jawa to Q3586.--122.90.98.50 07:24, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done The page isn't protected, so you can do it yourself too. Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 07:30, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup

Those pages need attentions [2] [3] --Rippitippi (talk) 08:25, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Everything needs attention. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 08:31, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

True, but should not be administrators to delete item with spam, vandalism etc? --Rippitippi (talk) 08:55, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism to date of birth property

There have been a series of edits in languages other than English to date of birth (P569) which change the description to a specific date. I speculate the dates are the birthdays of the vandals. Since the edits come from a variety of different IP addresses, I suggest the page be protected so only be edited by autoconfirmed users. Jc3s5h (talk) 17:34, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done, thanks for reporting. --Stryn (talk) 17:37, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fusionar 3

Q11935473 y Q6004507, por favor. Gracias, Laura Fiorucci (talk) 13:00, 4 March 2015 (UTC) Done--Harmonia Amanda (talk) 13:04, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Csigabi and his Gang's newest provocation

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

Thread closed. See rationale at bottom. Ajraddatz (talk) 17:48, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I must call attention to Administrators' noticeboard firmly again that editor "Csigabi" always abuses of his editor's rights because he does constant arbitrary actions that he makes quasi for the benefit of Wikidata but in fact these actions are arbitary and they serve only his personal revenge. Csigabi's last action was to protect after "Flóra Kádár" article until 15 March 2015 and now "Vladika Radivojević", "Judith Szűcs" and "Abetchew Bayan" until 10 March 2015 because of edit warring but this justification was only an arbitrary and unrealistic motivation. His Gang: namely editors Pallerti, Hungarikusz Firkász intentionally provoke me by generating a dispute which is negligible for them but it will be a pretense for Csigabi to protect this article at the point where his gang members editing is visable. Csigabi is an completely inappropriate for his task, service as an administrator because he violates the most important norm, rule for the admins to be, to remain neutral and he always acts for his favourites, his friends and he always wants to punish his putative enemies. I would like to remind the administrators that there was a debate between Csigabi and me and he has accused me to do vandalism and it has become clear that his accusation was false. So he has had no right to protect the page named above, I've already justified that the dispute is personal between the administrator named above and me and Csigabi has just begun to pick a quarrel between us. I myself ask other administrators warn him to his rights and they who has viewed, monitored my former editings can have experienced that I am a good and useful editor and I am working for the benefit of Wikipedia and Wikidata and the administator who is not neutral, is completely inappropriate for his task, service as an administrator. Please Stop Csigabi and his gang's malefic actions which they harass the well-intentioned and useful editors! Thank you for your kind attention!Borgatya (talk) 14:14, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

TL;DR. This may be news to you, but not all of your edits are helpful. Some are a pain, which Csigabi has tried his best to point out to you. The more you complain about this here, the less I'm willing to believe you. In fact, it's really getting on my wick. If you are going to wage an edit war over something as petty as the case of a letter (where it has been pointed out to you that you're wrong), then it's not a surprise that the item gets protected. That doesn't help anyone else here either. So why are you whinging here this time? Because you are being "provoked" you write. As far as I can see, you are the provocateur. Jared Preston (talk) 14:58, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I know, Jared Preston, you are very very very prejudiced against me but the community has declared that I am NOT a provocateur!!! Read below

General Opinions about me (Borgatya)

There is nothing wrong with page protection during a edit war. Read m:The Wrong Version and stop writing confusing and attacking stuff like this. You don't want to discus with Csigabi, according to your talk page. You should really look at yourself. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 15:15, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Borgatya, you're the one that keeps whining and making trouble, if you demand us take action to solve the problem, I don't think it'll be an action you'll be pleased with. --AmaryllisGardener ^talk 15:34, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Erm, no, I don't think I am. Nor did "the community" come to any such conclusion. Sjoerd and Amaryllis are right, too, by the way. Jared Preston (talk) 15:36, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A proverb says: You can't see the wood or forest for the trees, that is, you are unable to understand what is important in a situation because you are giving too much attention to details. Csigabi is not interested in wikidata improvement because he improves the putative mistakes only in MY editings exept the other articles. He only wants to tease me and he does not tolerate contradiction. I ask you to watch, monitor, pay attention to his all editings and you will notice that he's just hunting for me. It would be good if there were a consensus in these topics but as another proverb says: so many men so many minds and Csigabi wants to force his mind. Anyway, I am a learnt man with doctoral degree (PhD in Linguistics), I can send the relavant documents who have not got it or wants it, but I cannot tolerate the behave of the agents provocateurs named above. I would like to edit freely and happily.Borgatya (talk) 16:11, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No one cares about your PhD. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 16:13, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is your malignant opinion, it classifies you.Borgatya (talk) 16:15, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata should care about my PhD, because my editings are high-leveled and useful as if I seem to be immodest.Borgatya (talk) 16:20, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Out of nowhere I received today an email from this user @Borgatya. I've ever been involved in any related issue, I guess it's just because I'm an administrator here. Said user promises to send me copy of his doctoral degree in linguistics, says that "...I openly take myself, I have no secrets but I always hate if I am unfairly attacked, blamed and hurt..." followed by a copy of the very paragraph opening this thread.

I'll let other admins closer to the subject deal with this issue, but out of context it seems a bit harsh to protect a page after a single revert of a description from Actress from Hungary to Hungarian actress. Other edits to this page and other pages quoted seem to show that the user's contributions to Wikidata/Wikipedia are globally positive and are not limited to edit-warring, vandalism or personal attacks. History shows that it is often worthwhile to trust new editors who act in a "weird" way.

To Borgatya though I can only advise to assume good faith in other editors and do not throw accusations of conspiracies all around the place, it does not make you look good. You are not the only one to hold the truth, and sometimes it is better to let go. Place Clichy (talk) 16:32, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just a note by me that I also got such an email five days ago. Borgatya, that you are a linguist (Q14467526) doesn't excuse that you don't understand how Wikidata and its community work, and niether qualifies your edits as more important than eg. mine. Matěj Suchánek (talk) 17:00, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You misunderstand the problem unfortunately. I DO edit well and useful, please pay attention to my ALL editings and it will be clear for you.

The essence of the problem is pure personal and not professional. If you understand this small difference, the problem can be solved by itself, if you remind Csigabi to keep his licence lawfully and not for his personal revenge. He is not God, so he cannot judge anybody. If he understands that he cannot do anything with impunity, the problem will disappear. You are not good physicians, you have not listened to symptoms, but there were lotsa signs. Listen carefully!Borgatya (talk) 16:58, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Borgatya: We the physicians are telling you that you have a week to live because of your condition if you keep whining, and you're not listening to us. The symptoms that you say we're not seeing were just false alarms. --AmaryllisGardener ^talk 18:25, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Borgatya, Hungarikusz Firkász, Csigabi, Pallerti: Firstly, you all need to stop edit warring, especially over trivial matters such as this. I have protected another item (Q2821656) that was getting edit warred over. Don't reinstate any reverted disputed action until consensus is reached, because continued reversion when you know you're at odds over these edits constitutes edit warring and is blockable. If this continues, blocks will be handed out, since it is affecting numerous items.

@Csigabi: You're not the best admin to handle this, please let neutral administrators handle things like page protection. Clearly Borgatya takes your actions as hounding and this can be at least partly alleviated if you instead post here explicitly requesting those page protections. Think about why he is removing your messages from his talk page.

@Borgatya: Personal attacks are not acceptable no matter whether the other side is right or wrong, and like edit warring, is a blockable offense. You need to be less confrontational with your disputes. True, Csigabi should stop using his administrative tools here, but at the same time, it is true that you have been edit warring and failing to assume good faith (and failing to assume they do). In particular, please stop removing others' messages from your talk page. It only serves to further aggravate the situation.

Generally I've been seeing a lack of respect for each other and collaboration, both essential skills to work effectively on a wiki like this one. I know you all can do better than this and I expect better than this from now on.--Jasper Deng (talk) 18:44, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Jasper Deng: and others: thank you all for your wise pieces of advise and correct assesment of the situation. Part of the problems I see lies in the language barriers. Unfortunately our native language is one that not everyone understands, and I am the only admin here speaking it. Borgatya clearly takes advantage of this situation, and while in English he pretends to be a very peaceful and friendly person, who is hurt in his feelings and who is an innocent victim of some actions, in Hungarian he uses a foul language, not refraining from threats in his edit summaries, knowing that nobody else would understand them. I don't really care about the swear words he uses as they speak for themselves and the person who says them, but I can assure you, he would not dare get this far on our wiki knowing well the consequences.

For those who may not know: Borgatya, under a different name on huwiki, has been blocked about two dozen times for the exact same behaviour he pursues here. (If you think it is necessary, I can reveal his other name with proof that he is the same person). Due to his unacceptable behaviour towards the community he was even taken to the Arbitration Comittee on huwiki; in its decision the Committee forbid him to carry on wiht edit warring, personal attacks, flooding the talk pages with his problems, etc.

Let me make it clear that professionally I consider him a useful editor. However he is not a team worker. He hardly accepts other opinions, in fact he finds them as personal attacks on his presumed truth, even though in some cases he is wrong. This is clearly shown by the fact that he tends to revert pages to the obviously wrong version just not to let the other party have his/her opinion prevail.

As Jasper Deng suggested I should not handle this, but what is your recommendation to deal with such situations? Would in not look foolish to run to WD:AN for every edit that should be corrected? I am honestly waiting for your comments and suggestions on this. Should I turn to you with minor edit questions? While I was writing this message I found that ValterVB had already made a note on Borgatya's talk page reminding him of the capitalization rule that I myself tried to point out for him to no avail. Let us hope that he takes the advice. --Csigabi (talk) 20:18, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Csigabi: I would recommend that if you are involved in a dispute, and the other user is acting inappropriately, just bring it here, and right now we can decide whether Borgatya needs to be warned, admonished, or blocked. --AmaryllisGardener ^talk 20:48, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@AmaryllisGardener:

And TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN

I think you are prejudiced against me, but as an administrator, you SHOULD be neutral. I do not think that I have hurt or insulted you or everyone like AmaryllisGardener who attacks me. I have just edited THOSE articles which were neglected: I have labelled, filled out, improved with pieces of lack information, that is, I have just edited those articles which noone have cared about until this point. But lo and behold, these articles have become so interesting for everyone, especially for Csigabi and his gang, I do not understand why, why they have not been interested in these articles earlier because nobody has not protected these articles, the editing of these previously neglected and disinterested articles has not been prohibited. If I have not had dealt with them, nobody would cared about them until now. I ask respectfully why I am gulity, why I am considered as guilty and why I cannot edit e.g. the article Vladika Radivojević to add Hungarian equivalent to it, because Csigabi protected it, He is defending from me, who have improved this almost empty article. And YOU want to defend these articles from ME!!! It is comic! Nonsense! This accusation against me is absurd and I do not hope to thank me for these editings because this work is voluntary and I do it with pleasure but little did I ever dream that I get affront, attack and incomprehension because I have improved no-man's land!!! To whom it may concern: You (All) should shame on you instead! I thank the administrators for helping my work! lol Where is the neutrality?Borgatya (talk) 16:43, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Borgatya: I'm neutral, on threads a few months ago I defended you, but you were so good at incriminating yourself. Maybe you should get another Hungarian speaker to examine this situation closer. I don't know that much about this situation, but the next time you call everyone else here a gang you will be blocked. @Csigabi: Do you have that proof of his past of being blocked ∞ times on huwiki? That would be useful info to get. --AmaryllisGardener ^talk 16:55, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@AmaryllisGardener:I do not think that you are neutral, if you were neutral, you would not threaten me. Your duty as an administrator is to be equitable and fair. Why DO NOt I feel that you are neutral? If you have made peace in this situation, now everything would be quiet. You were powerless earlier and now you threaten me instead. You should be ashamed.Borgatya (talk) 17:10, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Borgatya: We've tried to "make peace in this situation", but you haven't accepted us. --AmaryllisGardener ^talk 17:31, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@AmaryllisGardener: As per your request: can you open this page? Since you don't speak the language: 3VSZ = 3RR, személyeskedés = personal attack, elfogadhatatlan hangnem = incivility. --Csigabi (talk) 17:36, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

These materials do not prove anything, these are pure provocation, because these attacks were unfair, unrighteous and narrow-minded as I have always emphasized. These accusations are ridiculous.Borgatya (talk) 17:45, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@AmaryllisGardener: I don't think so, because if you were right, the conflict between Csigabi and me would have already been disappeared.Borgatya (talk) 17:45, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I appreciate ValterVB & Caliburn's request about lowercase vs. capitals but other examples like actor from Hungary or Hungarian actor is purely matter of taste, because though I am not a native English-speaker (nor Csigabi) but on Commons these forms. actors from ...country are used. But I would like to emphasize, the conflict between us has not erupted from these little things, the reasons are deeper and Csigabi deliberately picked a quarrel with me. Finally I would like to ask you to help me that Csigabi might keep off my editings, I will use lowercase in descriptions in the future but if you view all the articles no one follows this rule and earlier Csigabi was not alert, watchful and interestingly he applies this rule only in my editings.Borgatya (talk) 17:45, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Closed - @Csigabi: any further use of your sysop tools while involved will result in a desysop thread being made. Any further edit warring or personally attacks from any of the involved users will result in a block to prevent this ridiculous behaviour. @Borgatya: I respect your education, sir, but that does not give you leave to insult other users here, nor does it mean that you "own" items or that your opinion is any more valid than anyone else's. Thanks for agreeing to abide by the manual of style; obviously not every page conforms to it, but we should be working towards ensuring that they do rather than throwing it out the window. Ajraddatz (talk) 17:48, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Semi-protection Wikidata:Trang Chính

The Wikidata:Trang Chính is the Main Page for all user with Vietnamese interface. Since this page only embed the core translation page, it doesn't need to be modified further. This page is linked from all Main Page on other Vietnamese projects, do it may be the target of vandalism. Semi-protection may be necessary. --minhhuy ^(talk) 16:25, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Don't see why this should be necessary, not much vandalism in the last few years(!). Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 16:27, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

IP vandalizing item

24.139.121.254 makes vandalism edits Q2832449. Please semi-protect this item. Jarould (talk) 02:12, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Jarould: The IP has been globally blocked by Hoo man, therefore protection is not needed. --AmaryllisGardener ^talk 03:48, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 186: / Line 186: @@
 ==Csigabi and his Gang's newest provocation==
+<div class="boilerplate metadata discussion-archived" style="background-color: #F2F4FC; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #aaa">
+:{{Discussion top/text/{{#ifexist:Template:Discussion top/text/{{int:lang}}|{{int:lang}}|en}}}} ''A summary of the conclusions reached follows.''
+::Thread closed. See rationale at bottom. [[User:Ajraddatz|Ajraddatz]] <small>([[User talk:Ajraddatz|talk]])</small> 17:48, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
+----
 I must call attention to Administrators' noticeboard firmly again that editor "Csigabi" always abuses of his editor's rights because he does constant arbitrary actions that he makes quasi for the benefit of Wikidata but in fact these actions are arbitary and they serve only his personal revenge. Csigabi's last action was to protect after "Flóra Kádár" article until 15 March 2015 and now "Vladika Radivojević", "Judith Szűcs" and "Abetchew Bayan" until 10 March 2015 because of edit warring but this justification was only an arbitrary and unrealistic motivation. His Gang: namely editors Pallerti, Hungarikusz Firkász intentionally provoke me by generating a dispute which is negligible for them but it will be a pretense for Csigabi to protect this article at the point where his gang members editing is visable. Csigabi is an completely inappropriate for his task, service as an administrator because he violates the most important norm, rule for the admins to be, to remain neutral and he always acts for his favourites, his friends and he always wants to punish his putative enemies. I would like to remind the administrators that there was a debate between Csigabi and me and he has accused me to do vandalism and it has become clear that his accusation was false.
 So he has had no right to protect the page named above, I've already justified that the dispute is personal between the administrator named above and me and Csigabi has just begun to pick a quarrel between us. I myself ask other administrators warn him to his rights and they who has viewed, monitored my former editings can have experienced that I am a good and useful editor and I am working for the benefit of Wikipedia and Wikidata and the administator who is not neutral, is completely inappropriate for his task, service as an administrator. Please Stop Csigabi and his gang's malefic actions which they harass the well-intentioned and useful editors! Thank you for your kind attention![[User:Borgatya|Borgatya]] ([[User talk:Borgatya|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 14:14, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
@@ Line 239: / Line 243: @@
 OK, I appreciate [[User:ValterVB|ValterVB]] & [[User:Caliburn|Caliburn]]'s request about lowercase vs. capitals but other examples like actor from Hungary or Hungarian actor is purely matter of taste, because though I am not a native English-speaker (nor Csigabi) but on Commons these forms. actors from ...country are used. But I would like to emphasize, the conflict between us has not erupted from these little things, the reasons are deeper and Csigabi deliberately picked a quarrel with me.
 Finally I would like to ask you to help me that Csigabi might keep off my editings, I will use lowercase in descriptions in the future but if you view all the articles no one follows this rule and earlier Csigabi was not alert, watchful and interestingly he applies this rule only in my editings.[[User:Borgatya|Borgatya]] ([[User talk:Borgatya|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 17:45, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
+*'''Closed''' - {{Ping|Csigabi}} any further use of your sysop tools while involved will result in a desysop thread being made. Any further edit warring or personally attacks ''from any of the involved users'' will result in a block to prevent this ridiculous behaviour. {{Ping|Borgatya}} I respect your education, sir, but that does not give you leave to insult other users here, nor does it mean that you "own" items or that your opinion is any more valid than anyone else's. Thanks for agreeing to abide by the manual of style; obviously not every page conforms to it, but we should be working towards ensuring that they do rather than throwing it out the window. [[User:Ajraddatz|Ajraddatz]] <small>([[User talk:Ajraddatz|talk]])</small> 17:48, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
+----
+:{{Discussion bottom/text/{{#ifexist:Template:Discussion bottom/text/{{int:lang}}|{{int:lang}}|en}}}}<!-- from Template:discussion bottom --></div>
+{{#ifeq:{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}|1|1}} |Requests for permissions| [[Category:Archived requests for permissions{{!}}{{SUBPAGENAME}}]] |}}
 == Semi-protection [[Wikidata:Trang Chính]] ==

Wikidata:Administrators' noticeboard: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 17:48, 5 March 2015

Contents

Global Pushing

Property proposal closures: backlog

Ruumis (Buffy, vampyyrintappaja)

Links for communication between categories

1991 UNCAF Nations Cup

72.10.124.210

Floribella (telenovela brasileira)

IP

Wikibooks mapping to Wikidata items - DEPLOYMENT IS TUESDAY

Messing with religion or worldview (P140) and several main items

Massive incorrect inserts of drama television series (Q1366112)

Fusionar

Fusionar 2

Csigabi's constant arbitrary actions

need help

Cleanup

Category

Vandalism to date of birth property

Fusionar 3

Csigabi and his Gang's newest provocation

Semi-protection Wikidata:Trang Chính

IP vandalizing item

Navigation menu

Wikidata:Administrators' noticeboard: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 17:48, 5 March 2015

Global Pushing

Property proposal closures: backlog

Ruumis (Buffy, vampyyrintappaja)

Links for communication between categories

1991 UNCAF Nations Cup

72.10.124.210

Floribella (telenovela brasileira)

IP

Wikibooks mapping to Wikidata items - DEPLOYMENT IS TUESDAY

Messing with religion or worldview (P140) and several main items

Massive incorrect inserts of drama television series (Q1366112)

Fusionar

Fusionar 2

Csigabi's constant arbitrary actions

need help

Cleanup

Category

Vandalism to date of birth property

Fusionar 3

Csigabi and his Gang's newest provocation

Semi-protection Wikidata:Trang Chính

IP vandalizing item

Navigation menu

Search